Simulation of epiretinal prostheses - Evaluation of geometrical factors affecting stimulation thresholds

BackgroundAn accurate understanding of the electrical interaction between retinal prostheses and retinal tissue is important to design effective devices. Previous studies have used modelling approaches to simulate electric fields generated by epiretinal prostheses in saline and to simulate retinal ganglion cell (RGC) activation using passive or/and active biophysical models of the retina. These models have limited scope for studying an implanted human retinal prosthesis as they often do not account for real geometry and composition of the prosthesis-retina interface. This interface consists of real dimensions and location of stimulation and ground electrodes that are separated by the retinal tissue and surrounded by physiological fluids.MethodsIn this study, we combined the prosthesis-retina interface elements into a framework to evaluate the geometrical factors affecting stimulation thresholds for epiretinal prostheses used in clinical human trials, as described by Balthasar et al. in their Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (IOVS) paper published in 2008 using the Argus I epiretinal implants. Finite element method (FEM) based computations were used to estimate threshold currents based on a threshold criterion employing a passive electric model of the retina.ResultsThreshold currents and impedances were estimated for different electrode-retina distances. The profiles and the values for thresholds and impedances obtained from our simulation framework are within the range of measured values in the only elaborate published clinical trial until now using Argus I epiretinal implants. An estimation of resolution for the electrodes used in these trials was provided. Our results reiterate the importance of close proximity between electrodes and retina for safe and efficient retinal stimulation.ConclusionsThe validation of our simulation framework being relevant for epiretinal prosthesis research is derived from the good agreement of the computed trends and values of the current study with measurements demonstrated in existing clinical trials on humans (Argus I). The proposed simulation framework could be used to generate the relationship between threshold and impedance for any electrode geometry and consequently be an effective tool for design engineers, surgeons and electrophysiologists.

[1]  James D. Weiland,et al.  An In Vitro Model of a Retinal Prosthesis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Electrode Impedance, the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, and Behavioral Measures in Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant Users , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[3]  T. Velte,et al.  A computational model of electrical stimulation of the retinal ganglion cell , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  D. Scribner,et al.  Impedance-based retinal contact imaging as an aid for the placement of high resolution epiretinal prostheses , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  Angelica Perez Fornos Minimum requirements for a retinal prosthesis to restore useful vision , 2006 .

[6]  G M Clark,et al.  A study of intra-cochlear electrodes and tissue interface by electrochemical impedance methods in vivo. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[7]  M. Mcmahon,et al.  Electrode Impedance as a Predictor of Electrode–Retina Proximity and Perceptual Threshold in a Retinal Prosthesis , 2006 .

[8]  J D Loudin,et al.  Optoelectronic retinal prosthesis: system design and performance , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  F. Werblin,et al.  A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  David Tsai,et al.  Direct activation and temporal response properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells following subretinal stimulation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Daniel Palanker,et al.  Strength-duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  D. B. Heppner,et al.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[13]  James Weiland,et al.  Artificial vision: needs, functioning, and testing of a retinal electronic prosthesis. , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[14]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Stimulation of the Retinal Network in Bionic Vision Devices: From Multi-Electrode Arrays to Pixelated Vision , 2010, ICONIP.

[15]  Z. Feit,et al.  Electrical conduction in polyimide between 20 and 350° C , 1987 .

[16]  Nicolas P Cottaris,et al.  How the retinal network reacts to epiretinal stimulation to form the prosthetic visual input to the cortex , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[17]  S. B. Brummer,et al.  Electrochemical Considerations for Safe Electrical Stimulation of the Nervous System with Platinum Electrodes , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Daniel Palanker,et al.  Design of a high-resolution optoelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  R. Jensen,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Newton Kara-José,et al.  Retinal thickness assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in pseudophakic macular edema. , 2006, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia.

[21]  R. Klein,et al.  Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  J. Weiland,et al.  Selective labeling of retinal ganglion cells with calcium indicators by retrograde loading in vitro , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  D. Norren,et al.  Origin of the oscillatory potentials in the primate retina , 1985, Vision Research.

[26]  Alexander Sher,et al.  Ganglion Cells With Multielectrode Arrays Electrical Stimulation of Mammalian Retinal , 2006 .

[27]  Simulations to study spatial extent of stimulation and effect of electrode-tissue gap in subretinal implants. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[28]  J. Fohlmeister,et al.  Modeling the repetitive firing of retinal ganglion cells , 1990, Brain Research.

[29]  Robert J Greenberg,et al.  Temporal interactions during paired-electrode stimulation in two retinal prosthesis subjects. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  Shu-zhen Wang,et al.  Retinal Development , 2012, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[31]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visual prosthetics: physiology, bioengineering, rehabilitation. , 2011 .

[32]  James D. Weiland,et al.  Computational Modeling of Electromagnetic and Thermal Effects for a Dual-Unit Retinal Prosthesis: Inductive Telemetry, Temperature Increase, and Current Densities in the Retina , 2007 .

[33]  F. Rattay,et al.  Excitability of bipolar and ganglion cells with retinal prosthesis: a modeling study , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[34]  Stephen J. Eglen,et al.  Retinal Development: Retinal Development , 2006 .

[35]  Arup Roy,et al.  Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[36]  T.L. Rose,et al.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. VIII. Electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses (neuronal application) , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  J. Weiland,et al.  Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[38]  W. Grill,et al.  Sites of neuronal excitation by epiretinal electrical stimulation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[39]  A. Y. Chow,et al.  Implantation of silicon chip microphotodiode arrays into the cat subretinal space , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[40]  Daniel R. Merrill,et al.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[41]  S. Fried,et al.  Axonal sodium-channel bands shape the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2003, Vision Research.

[43]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[44]  Peter Schlattmann,et al.  Theory and Algorithms , 2009 .

[45]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  A continuum model of the retinal network and its response to electrical stimulation , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[46]  James D. Weiland,et al.  Visual Prosthesis , 2008, Proceedings of the IEEE.