Directional Collective Cell Migration Emerges as a Property of Cell Interactions

Collective cell migration is a fundamental process, occurring during embryogenesis and cancer metastasis. Neural crest cells exhibit such coordinated migration, where aberrant motion can lead to fatality or dysfunction of the embryo. Migration involves at least two complementary mechanisms: contact inhibition of locomotion (a repulsive interaction corresponding to a directional change of migration upon contact with a reciprocating cell), and co-attraction (a mutual chemoattraction mechanism). Here, we develop and employ a parameterized discrete element model of neural crest cells, to investigate how these mechanisms contribute to long-range directional migration during development. Motion is characterized using a coherence parameter and the time taken to reach, collectively, a target location. The simulated cell group is shown to switch from a diffusive to a persistent state as the response-rate to co-attraction is increased. Furthermore, the model predicts that when co-attraction is inhibited, neural crest cells can migrate into restrictive regions. Indeed, inhibition of co-attraction in vivo and in vitro leads to cell invasion into restrictive areas, confirming the prediction of the model. This suggests that the interplay between the complementary mechanisms may contribute to guidance of the neural crest. We conclude that directional migration is a system property and does not require action of external chemoattractants.

[1]  W. Rappel,et al.  External and internal constraints on eukaryotic chemotaxis , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Phase transition in the collective migration of tissue cells: experiment and model. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Roberto Mayor,et al.  Keeping in touch with contact inhibition of locomotion , 2010, Trends in cell biology.

[4]  Josephine C. Adams,et al.  Changes in keratinocyte adhesion during terminal differentiation: Reduction in fibronectin binding precedes α 5 β 1 integrin loss from the cell surface , 1990, Cell.

[5]  R. Mayor,et al.  Integrating chemotaxis and contact-inhibition during collective cell migration , 2010, Small GTPases.

[6]  R. Tucker,et al.  The control of pigment cell pattern formation in the California newt, Taricha torosa. , 1986, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[7]  R. Johnsen,et al.  Theory and Experiment , 2010 .

[8]  Roberto Mayor,et al.  Contact Inhibition of Locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration , 2008, Nature.

[9]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[10]  A Libchaber,et al.  E. Coli and oxygen: a motility transition. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[11]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Cell proliferation drives neural crest cell invasion of the intestine. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[12]  Michelle L. Wynn,et al.  Follow-the-leader cell migration requires biased cell–cell contact and local microenvironmental signals , 2013, Physical biology.

[13]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  The Dynamics of Coordinated Group Hunting and Collective Information Transfer among Schooling Prey , 2012, Current Biology.

[14]  Klemens Rottner,et al.  On the Rho'd: The regulation of membrane protrusions by Rho‐GTPases , 2008, FEBS letters.

[15]  M. Mareel,et al.  Functional downregulation of the E-cadherin/catenin complex leads to loss of contact inhibition of motility and of mitochondrial activity, but not of growth in confluent epithelial cell cultures. , 1997, European Journal of Cell Biology.

[16]  R. Mayor,et al.  Collective cell migration of the cephalic neural crest: The art of integrating information , 2011, Genesis.

[17]  J. Bard,et al.  The behavior of fibroblasts from the developing avian cornea. Morphology and movement in situ and in vitro , 1975, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. II. Monolayering of fibroblasts. , 1954, Experimental cell research.

[19]  J. Trinkaus,et al.  Significance of cell-to cell contacts for the directional movement of neural crest cells within a hydrated collagen lattice. , 1981, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[20]  Michael Bindschadler,et al.  Sheet migration by wounded monolayers as an emergent property of single-cell dynamics , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[21]  Francisco Portillo,et al.  The transcription factor Snail controls epithelial–mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[22]  J. Thiery,et al.  Attachment, spreading and locomotion of avian neural crest cells are mediated by multiple adhesion sites on fibronectin molecules. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[23]  K. Page,et al.  Complement Fragment C3a Controls Mutual Cell Attraction during Collective Cell Migration , 2011, Developmental cell.

[24]  Santiago Schnell,et al.  Computational modelling of cell chain migration reveals mechanisms that sustain follow-the-leader behaviour , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[25]  Igor S. Aranson,et al.  Emergence of agent swarm migration and vortex formation through inelastic collisions , 2008 .

[26]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Mechanical waves during tissue expansion , 2012, Nature Physics.

[27]  Shin Ishii,et al.  Multi-Cellular Logistics of Collective Cell Migration , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  Lance A Davidson,et al.  Macroscopic stiffening of embryonic tissues via microtubules, RhoGEF and the assembly of contractile bundles of actomyosin , 2010, Development.

[29]  A. Gaultier,et al.  Integrin alpha5beta1 supports the migration of Xenopus cranial neural crest on fibronectin. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[30]  B. Cox A strain-cue hypothesis for biological network formation , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[31]  R. Huang,et al.  Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Development and Disease , 2009, Cell.

[32]  R. Mayor,et al.  Molecular analysis of neural crest migration , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Kerry A Landman,et al.  Building stable chains with motile agents: Insights into the morphology of enteric neural crest cell migration. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  Smart Swarms of Bacteria-Inspired Agents with Performance Adaptable Interactions , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[35]  Paul Martin,et al.  Wound Healing--Aiming for Perfect Skin Regeneration , 1997, Science.

[36]  A. Huttenlocher,et al.  Integrin and Cadherin Synergy Regulates Contact Inhibition of Migration and Motile Activity , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  Søren Vedel,et al.  Migration of cells in a social context , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Helen K. Matthews,et al.  Directional migration of neural crest cells in vivo is regulated by Syndecan-4/Rac1 and non-canonical Wnt signaling/RhoA , 2008, Development.

[39]  R. McLennan,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) regulates cranial neural crest migration in vivo. , 2010, Developmental biology.

[40]  Ruth E Baker,et al.  Multiscale mechanisms of cell migration during development: theory and experiment , 2012, Development.

[41]  R. Mayor,et al.  Neural crest delamination and migration: from epithelium-to-mesenchyme transition to collective cell migration. , 2012, Developmental biology.

[42]  P. Friedl,et al.  Collective cell migration in morphogenesis and cancer. , 2004, The International journal of developmental biology.

[43]  L. Milne‐Thomson A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions , 1945, Nature.

[44]  Pekka Lappalainen,et al.  Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  Brian Stramer,et al.  Clasp-mediated microtubule bundling regulates persistent motility and contact repulsion in Drosophila macrophages in vivo , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[46]  K. Artinger,et al.  A role for chemokine signaling in neural crest cell migration and craniofacial development. , 2009, Developmental biology.

[47]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. I. Speed of movement of chick heart fibroblasts in relation to their mutual contacts. , 1953, Experimental cell research.

[48]  P. Thorogood,et al.  Contact behaviour exhibited by migrating neural crest cells in confrontation culture with somitic cells , 2004, Cell and Tissue Research.

[49]  A. Gaultier,et al.  Integrin α5β1 supports the migration of Xenopus cranial neural crest on fibronectin , 2003 .

[50]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[51]  B. A. Flaxman,et al.  Ultrastructural studies of the early junctional zone formed by keratinocytes showing contact inhibition of movement in vitro. , 1974, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[52]  F. Watt,et al.  Changes in keratinocyte adhesion during terminal differentiation: reduction in fibronectin binding precedes alpha 5 beta 1 integrin loss from the cell surface. , 1990, Cell.

[53]  A. Mogilner,et al.  Mathematical Biology Mutual Interactions, Potentials, and Individual Distance in a Social Aggregation , 2003 .

[54]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[55]  R. Timpl,et al.  Neural crest cell migration: requirements for exogenous fibronectin and high cell density , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.

[56]  H. Berg,et al.  Dynamics of bacterial swarming. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[57]  Y. Barrandon,et al.  The multifaceted adult epidermal stem cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[58]  M. Parsons,et al.  Collective Chemotaxis Requires Contact-Dependent Cell Polarity , 2010, Developmental cell.

[59]  D. Newgreen,et al.  Morphology and behaviour of neural crest cells of chick embryo in vitro , 1979, Cell and Tissue Research.

[60]  Julian Lewis,et al.  Organizing cell renewal in the intestine: stem cells, signals and combinatorial control , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[61]  Shereen R Kadir,et al.  Competition amongst Eph receptors regulates contact inhibition of locomotion and invasiveness in prostate cancer cells , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.