Bioeconomics of Managing the Spread of Exotic Pest Species with Barrier Zones

Exotic pests are serious threats to North American ecosystems; thus, economic analysis of decisions about eradication, stopping, or slowing their spread may be critical to ecosystem management. The proposed bioeconomic model assumes that the rate of population expansion can be reduced (even to negative values in a case of eradication) if certain management actions are taken along the population front. The area of management can be viewed as a dynamic barrier zone that moves together with the population front. The lower is the target rate of spread, the higher would be both benefits and costs of the project. The problem is to find the optimal target rate of spread at which the present value of net benefits from managing population spread reaches its maximum value. If a population spreads along an infinite habitat strip, the target rate of spread is optimal if the slope of the cost function versus the rate of spread is equal to the ratio of the average pest-related damage per unit time and unit area to the discount rate. In a more complex model where the potential area of expansion is limited, two local maxima of net benefits may exist: one for eradication and another for slowing the spread. If both maxima are present, their heights are compared and the strategy that corresponds to a higher value of net benefits is selected. The optimal strategy changes from eradication to slowing the spread and finally to doing nothing as the area occupied by the species increases. The model shows that slowing the spread of pest species generates economic benefits even if a relatively small area remains uninfested. The cost of slowing the spread can be estimated from a model of population expansion via establishment of isolated colonies beyond the moving front. The model is applied to managing the spread of the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) populations in the United States.

[1]  M. Neubert,et al.  Projecting Rates of Spread for Invasive Species , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  D. Simberloff Introduced Insects: A Biogeographic and Systematic Perspective , 1986 .

[3]  C. Shoemaker,et al.  Optimization Analysis of the Integration of Biological, Cultural, and Chemical Control of Alfalfa Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) , 1983 .

[4]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. , 1993 .

[5]  James W. Smith Boll Weevil Eradication: Area-Wide Pest Management , 1998 .

[6]  Ray F. Smith,et al.  THE INTEGRATION OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF , 1959 .

[7]  Kurt W. Gottschalk,et al.  Forest susceptibility to the gypsy moth. , 1997 .

[8]  R. Reardon Appalachian gypsy-moth integrated pest-management project , 1991 .

[9]  J. G. Skellam Random dispersal in theoretical populations , 1951, Biometrika.

[10]  D. Dahlsten,et al.  Eradication of Exotic Pests: Analysis with Case Histories , 1989 .

[11]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  A model for testing hypotheses of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L., population dynamics , 1996 .

[12]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Models of Spatial Spread: Is the Theory Complete? , 1996 .

[13]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Complex Dynamics in Ecological Time Series , 1992 .

[14]  R. I. Sailer CHAPTER 2 – History of Insect Introductions , 1983 .

[15]  N. Shigesada,et al.  Modeling Stratified Diffusion in Biological Invasions , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  “Slow The Spread”: A National Program to Contain the Gypsy Moth , 2002, Journal of Forestry.

[17]  Christian Wissel,et al.  Insect pest control by a spatial barrier , 1994 .

[18]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  Optimizing the Use of Barrier Zones to Slow the Spread of Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in North America , 1998 .

[19]  Gregory A. Elmes,et al.  Gypsy moth invasion in North America: a quantitative analysis , 1992 .

[20]  B. Goh,et al.  Management and analysis of biological populations , 1982 .

[21]  Richard N. Mack,et al.  Controlling the spread of plant invasions: The importance of nascent foci. , 1988 .

[22]  R. Taylor,et al.  Density/height profile and long-range dispersal of first-instar gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) , 1986 .

[23]  Victor C. Mastro,et al.  Invasion by Exotic Forest Pests: A Threat to Forest Ecosystems , 1995 .

[24]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Spread of invading organisms , 1990, Landscape Ecology.

[25]  P. Turchin Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[26]  Victor C. Mastro,et al.  Learning from the Legacy of Léopold Trouvelot , 1989 .

[27]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  BIOECONOMICS OF MANAGING THE SPREAD OFEXOTIC PEST SPECIES WITH BARRIER ZONES , 1998 .

[28]  P. Geoffrey Allen,et al.  Bioeconomics of Aquaculture , 1984 .

[29]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  MODEL OF SLOWING THE SPREAD OF GYPSY MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA: LYMANTRIIDAE) WITH A BARRIER ZONE , 1998 .

[30]  Ray F. Smith,et al.  The integrated control concept , 1959 .

[31]  F. William Ravlin,et al.  Potential benefits of slowing the gypsy moth's spread. , 1996 .

[32]  S. Brendle,et al.  Calculus of Variations , 1927, Nature.

[33]  Michael E. McManus,et al.  An insect out of control? The potential for spread and establishment of the gypsy moth in new forest areas in the United States , 1991 .

[34]  John Sessions,et al.  Discount Rate for Long-Term Forest Service Investments , 1981, Journal of Forestry.

[35]  R. Hengeveld,et al.  Analysing the Velocity of Animal Range Expansion , 1992 .