On Young Highly Innovative Companies: Why They Matter and How (Not) to Policy Support Them

Recent policy initiatives in the EU aim at supporting so-called young highly innovative companies (YICs). This article provides empirical evidence from German CIS data on the innovative performances of this specific type of firms, supporting why they matter. We first characterize YICs in the sample of innovation active firms. We show that firms that combine newness, smallness, and high R&D intensity are rare in the sample of innovative firms, but achieve significantly higher innovative sales than other innovative firms, especially innovative sales that are new to the market. Not surprisingly, YICs view financial constraints, both internal and external, as an important factor hampering their innovation activities, significantly more so than other innovation active firms. This access to finance problem is an often used motive for government intervention. On the effectiveness of subsidies, our results suggest that the subsidy allocation mechanisms at place in Germany during the sample period are not associated with relatively higher innovative performance of the subsidized YICs as compared to other recipients. Copyright 2010 The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

[1]  J. Angrist,et al.  Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with Funding from Estimation of Limited-dependent Variable Models with Dummy Endogenous Regressors: Simple Strategies for Empirical Practice , 2011 .

[2]  D. Newbery,et al.  Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[3]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[4]  Enrico Santarelli,et al.  Is subsidizing entry an optimal policy , 2002 .

[5]  M. Kamien,et al.  Market structure and innovation , 1982 .

[6]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  Assessing the Contribution of Venture Capital to Innovation , 2000 .

[7]  Georg Licht,et al.  New technology-based firms in Germany: a survey of the recent evidence , 1998 .

[8]  Kris Aerts.  Who writes the pay slip? Do R&D subsidies merely increase researcher wages? , 2008 .

[9]  John Haltiwanger,et al.  Microeconomic Evidence of Creative Destruction in Industrial and Developing Countries , 2004 .

[10]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Building Programme Evaluation into the Design of Public Research‐Support Programmes , 2002 .

[11]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Financial constraints to innovation in the UK: evidence from CIS2 and CIS3 , 2007 .

[12]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Patents and R and D: Is There a Lag? , 1986 .

[13]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data , 1998 .

[14]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  Capturing Technological Opportunity Via Japan's Star Scientists: Evidence from Japanese Firms' Biotech Patents and Products , 1998 .

[15]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[16]  Frederique Savignac,et al.  The Impact of Financial Constraints on Innovation: What Can Be Learned from a Direct Measure? , 2007 .

[17]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation and Small Firms , 1990 .

[18]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  More evidence on the undercounting of small firm R&D , 1991 .

[19]  Bronwyn H. Hall,et al.  Financing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[20]  Gabriele Pellegrino,et al.  How Do Young Innovative Companies Innovate? , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[21]  M. Colombo,et al.  Funding Gaps? Access To Bank Loans By High-Tech Start-Ups , 2007 .

[22]  S. Wallsten.  The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program , 2000 .

[23]  M. Colombo,et al.  Start-Up Size: The Role of External Financing , 2005 .

[24]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents and R&D: is There a Lag? , 1984 .

[25]  James J. Anton,et al.  Expropriation and Inventions: Appropriable Rents in the Absence of Property Rights , 1994 .

[26]  O. Marsili,et al.  Survivor: The Role of Innovation in Firms' Survival , 2006 .

[27]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[28]  Franz C. Palm,et al.  Financial Constraints and Other Obstacles: are they a Threat to Innovation Activity? , 2008 .

[29]  J. Konings,et al.  Financial Constraints and the Cyclicality of R&D Investment: Evidence from Slovenia , 2009 .

[30]  J. Lerner,et al.  The University and the Start-Up:Lessons from the Past Two Decades , 2004 .

[31]  Bernadette Madeuf,et al.  NTBFs—the French case , 1998 .

[32]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[33]  M. Vivarelli,et al.  Entrepreneurship and the Process of Firms' Entry, Survival and Growth , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[34]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[35]  J. Gans,et al.  Incumbency and R&D Incentives: Licensing the Gale of Creative Destruction , 1999 .

[36]  F. Lichtenberg.  The Private R&D Investment Response to Federal Design and Technical Competitions , 1988 .

[37]  S. Klepper.  Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[38]  Katrin Hussinger,et al.  R&D and Subsidies at the Firm Level: An Application of Parametric and Semi-Parametric Two-Step Selection Models , 2008 .

[39]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[40]  Saul Lach,et al.  Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence from Israel , 2000 .

[41]  D. Czarnitzki,et al.  The Effects of Public R&D Subsidies on Firms' Innovation Activities , 2003 .

[42]  Alessandro Arrighetti,et al.  The Role of Innovation in the Postentry Performance of New Small Firms: Evidence from Italy , 1999 .

[43]  Andrew A. Toole,et al.  Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence , 1999 .

[44]  Mike Wright,et al.  Dynamics of Science-based entrepreneurship , 2010 .

[45]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[46]  J. Angrist,et al.  Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models With Dummy Endogenous Regressors , 2001 .

[47]  D. Czarnitzki,et al.  Using Innovation Survey Data to Evaluate R&D Policy: The Case of Belgium , 2004 .

[48]  Tanja Tanayama,et al.  Evaluating Innovation Policy: A Structural Treatment Effect Model of R&D Subsidies , 2008 .

[49]  Jordi Jaumandreu,et al.  Barriers to Innovation and Subsidy Effectiveness , 2001 .

[50]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[51]  David H. Hsu,et al.  When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction? , 2000 .

[52]  Luca Grilli,et al.  Founders' human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view , 2005 .

[53]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconomic Evaluation Studies , 1999 .

[54]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[55]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size , 1987 .

[56]  Steven Klepper,et al.  A Reprise of Size and R & D , 1996 .

[57]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[58]  F. Palm,et al.  Working Paper Series # 2007-011 Financial Constraint and R & D Investment : Evidence from CIS , 2007 .

[59]  Joshua S. Gans,et al.  When does funding research by smaller firms bear fruit?: Evidence from the SBIR program* , 2000 .

[60]  David J. Storey,et al.  New technology-based firms in the European union: an introduction , 1998 .

[61]  Mario Pianta,et al.  Firm Size and Innovation in European Manufacturing , 2008 .