Effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical changeover delays on concurrent performances.

Two variable-interval 3-min schedules functioned concurrently to arrange reinforcement of a pigeon's pecks on a single key, the main key. Each schedule was associated with a distinct color of the main key; a response on a second key alternated the color and schedule assignment of the main key. A changeover delay, a period of time following schedule and key-color alternation during which reinforcement of responding on the main key could not occur, was arranged with equal or with unequal durations for the two directions of alternation. Durations were varied from 0.33 sec to 27 sec, in addition to no delay. With equal delays for the two directions of alternation, the pigeon alternated the schedules less often the larger the delay duration. When the delays in the two directions of alternation were unequal, it could be shown that alternation of the schedules was reduced both by a delay just incurred by the last alternation and by a. delay to be incurred by the next. The latter delay was more potent in reducing the frequency of alternations.

[1]  J. Todorov Concurrent performances: effect of punishment contingent on the switching response. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  A C CATANIA,et al.  Independence of concurrent responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  E. Fantino,et al.  Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  A C CATANIA,et al.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  R. Shull,et al.  The relation between response rates and reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  Robert L. Ten Eyck,et al.  Effects of rate of reinforcement-time upon concurrent operant performance , 1970 .

[8]  S. Pliskoff,et al.  A method for increasing the reinforcement magnitude of intracranial stimulation. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Choice and delay of reinforcement. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  R. Shull,et al.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  A. Brownstein,et al.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  C. T. Perin The effect of delayed reinforcement upon the differentiation of bar responses in white rats. , 1943 .

[14]  W M Baum,et al.  Choice as time allocation. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  D. Stubbs,et al.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  J D Findley,et al.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.