Depositional Processes in Large‐Scale Debris‐Flow Experiments

This study examines the depositional process and characteristics of deposits of large‐scale experimental debris flows (to 15 m3) composed of mixtures of gravel (to 32 mm), sand, and mud. The experiments were performed using a 95‐m‐long, 2‐m‐wide debris‐flow flume that slopes 31°. Following release, experimental debris flows invariably developed numerous shallow (∼ 10 cm deep) surges. Sediment transported by surges accumulated abruptly on a 3° runout slope at the mouth of the flume. Deposits developed in a complex manner through a combination of shoving forward and shouldering aside previously deposited debris and through progressive vertical accretion. Progressive accretion by the experimental flows is contrary to commonly assumed en masse sedimentation by debris flows. Despite progressive sediment emplacement, deposits were composed of unstratified accumulations of generally unsorted debris; hence massively textured, poorly sorted debris‐flow deposits are not emplaced uniquely en masse. The depositional process was recorded mainly by deposit morphology and surface texture and was not faithfully registered by interior sedimentary texture; homogeneous internal textures could be misinterpreted as the result of en masse emplacement by a single surge. Deposition of sediment by similar, yet separate, debris flows produced a homogenous, massively textured composite deposit having little stratigraphic distinction. Similar deposit characteristics and textures are observed in natural debris‐flow deposits in China. Experimental production of massively textured deposits by progressive sediment accretion limits interpretations that can be drawn from deposit characteristics and casts doubt on methods of estimating flow properties from deposit thickness or from relations between particle size and bed thickness.

[1]  M. Branney,et al.  Comment [on “On pyroclastic flow emplacement” by Maurizio Battaglia] , 1996 .

[2]  J. Major.  Experimental studies of deposition by debris flows: process, characteristics of deposits, and effects of pore-fluid pressure , 1996 .

[3]  S. Chough,et al.  Bouldery deposits in the lowermost part of the Cretaceous Kyokpori Formation, SW Korea: cohesionless debris flows and debris falls on a steep-gradient delta slope , 1995 .

[4]  John G. McPherson,et al.  Alluvial fans and their natural distinction from rivers based on morphology , 1995 .

[5]  J. Degraff.  The geomorphology of some debris flows in the southern Sierra Nevada, California , 1994 .

[6]  A. Scheidegger,et al.  Clast orientations of the 1985 lahars of the Nevado del Ruiz, Colombia and implications for depositional processes , 1994 .

[7]  M. Battaglia.  On pyroclastic flow emplacement , 1993 .

[8]  P. Julien,et al.  Two‐Dimensional Water Flood and Mudflow Simulation , 1993 .

[9]  Shucheng Zhang,et al.  A Comprehensive Approach to the Observation and Prevention of Debris Flows in China , 1993 .

[10]  R. Iverson,et al.  Friction in Debris Flows: Inferences from Large-scale Flume Experiments , 1993 .

[11]  D. Cruden,et al.  The rockslide and debris flow from Mount Cayley, B.C., in June 1984 , 1992 .

[12]  M. Branney,et al.  A reappraisal of ignimbrite emplacement: progressive aggradation and changes from particulate to non-particulate flow during emplacement of high-grade ignimbrite , 1992 .

[13]  K. Whipple,et al.  The influence of debris-flow rheology on fan morphology, Owens Valley, California , 1992 .

[14]  G. Ghibaudo.  Subaqueous sediment gravity flow deposits: practical criteria for their field description and classification , 1992 .

[15]  Jon J. Major,et al.  Debris flow rheology: Experimental analysis of fine‐grained slurries , 1992 .

[16]  P. J. Shaller.  Analysis of a large moist landslide, Lost River Range, Idaho, U.S.A. , 1991 .

[17]  S. Carey.  Transport and Deposition of Tephra by Pyroclastic Flows and Surges , 1991 .

[18]  Gary A. Smith,et al.  Lahars : volcano-hydrologic events and deposition in the debris flow-hyperconcentrated flow continuum. , 1991 .

[19]  R. Janda,et al.  Perturbation and melting of snow and ice by the 13 November 1985 eruption of Nevado del Ruiz, Colombia, and consequent mobilization, flow and deposition of lahars , 1990 .

[20]  K. Rodolfo,et al.  Sedimentologic and dynamic differences between hot and cold laharic debris flows of Mayon Volcano, Philippines , 1990 .

[21]  T. Davies.  Debris-flow surges : experimental simulation , 1990 .

[22]  F. Weirich.  The generation of turbidity currents by subaerial debris flows, California , 1989 .

[23]  B. Palmer,et al.  Lahar facies of the Mount Dutton Formation (Oligocene-Miocene) in the Marysvale Volcanic Field, southwestern Utah , 1988 .

[24]  D. L. Peck,et al.  Origins, behavior, and sedimentology of lahars and lahar-runout flows in the Toutle-Cowlitz River system , 1988 .

[25]  R. Cas,et al.  A debris‐flow deposit with multiple plug‐flow channels and associated side accretion deposits , 1987 .

[26]  B. Voight,et al.  Sedimentology and Clast Orientations of the 18 May 1980 Southwest-Flank Lahars, Mount St. Helens, Washington , 1986 .

[27]  K. M. Scott,et al.  Downstream dilution of a lahar : transition from debris flow to hyperconcentrated streamflow. , 1985 .

[28]  T. Pierson,et al.  Polallie Creek debris flow and subsequent dam-break flood of 1980, East Fork Hood River basin, Oregon , 1985 .

[29]  A. Shultz.  Subaerial Debris-Flow Deposition in the Upper Paleozoic Cutler Formation, Western Colorado , 1984 .

[30]  Oldrich Hungr,et al.  Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures , 1984 .

[31]  W. Nemec,et al.  Alluvial and Coastal Conglomerates: Their Significant Features and Some Comments on Gravelly Mass-Flow Deposits , 1984 .

[32]  John E. Costa,et al.  Physical Geomorphology of Debris Flows , 1984 .

[33]  J. E. Costa,et al.  Debris-flow dynamics , 1984 .

[34]  John L. Innes,et al.  Debris flows , 1983 .

[35]  B. Voight,et al.  Nature and mechanics of the Mount St Helens rockslide-avalanche of 18 May 1980 , 1983 .

[36]  D. Lawson.  Mobilization, Movement and Deposition of Active Subaerial Sediment Flows, Matanuska Glacier, Alaska , 1982, The Journal of Geology.

[37]  D. Lowe.  Sediment Gravity Flows: II Depositional Models with Special Reference to the Deposits of High-Density Turbidity Currents , 1982 .

[38]  John E. Costa,et al.  Debris Flows in Small Mountain Stream Channels of Colorado and Their Hydrologic Implications , 1981 .

[39]  T. Pierson,et al.  Dominant particle support mechanisms in debris flows at Mt Thomas, New Zealand, and implications for flow mobility , 1981 .

[40]  S Okuda,et al.  Observations on the motion of a debris flow and its geomorphological effects , 1980 .

[41]  A. Jopling,et al.  Mechanics of Sediment Movement (SEPM Short Course No. 3) , 1979 .

[42]  R. Hooke,et al.  Geometry of alluvial fans: Effect of discharge and sediment size , 1979 .

[43]  R. Wasson.  A Debris Flow at Reshūn, Pakistan Hindu Kush , 1978 .

[44]  Gerard Middleton,et al.  Mechanics of sediment movement , 1978 .

[45]  R. Sparks,et al.  Grain size variations in ignimbrites and implications for the transport of pyroclastic flows , 1976 .

[46]  M. Hampton.  Competence of Fine-grained Debris Flows , 1975 .

[47]  一紀 正路.  Pennsylvania State Universityに留学して , 1975 .

[48]  R. Campbell,et al.  Spring mudflows at Wrightwood, Southern California , 1974, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[49]  Ralph O. Kehle,et al.  Physical Processes in Geology , 1972 .

[50]  R. V. Fisher,et al.  Features of coarse-grained, high-concentration fluids and their deposits , 1971 .

[51]  R. Hooke.  Processes on Arid-Region Alluvial Fans , 1967, The Journal of Geology.

[52]  R. Curry.  OBSERVATION OF ALPINE MUDFLOWS IN THE TENMILE RANGE, CENTRAL COLORADO , 1966 .

[53]  R. V. Fisher.  Mechanism of deposition from pyroclastic flows , 1966 .