Enhancing Scientific Literacy in the Undergraduate Cell Biology Laboratory Classroom†

This paper describes the implementation of the Scientific Literacy in Cell Biology (SLCB) curriculum in an undergraduate biology laboratory course. The SLCB curriculum incorporated the reading and discussion of primary literature into hands-on and collaborative practical experiences. It was implemented in five stages over an 11-week period, during which students were also introduced to the theory and practice of common cell biology techniques. We report on the effectiveness of the course, as measured by pre- and post-course survey data probing students’ content knowledge and their level of familiarity, confidence, and experience with different skills pertaining to analyzing (reading, interpreting, and discussing) primary literature. In the spring 2015 semester, 287 (72%) of the 396 students who were enrolled in the laboratory completed both the pre- and post-course survey. The average score on the content questions of the post-course survey was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than the average score on the pre-course survey. Students reported that they gained greater familiarity, experience, and confidence in the skills that were measured. Our findings may aid in reforming higher-education science laboratory courses to better promote writing, reading, data processing, and presentation skills. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education

[1]  G. Marbach-Ad,et al.  Incorporating a Literature-Based Learning Approach into a Lab Course to Increase Student Understanding. , 2010 .

[2]  Clarissa Dirks,et al.  Teaching the Process of Science: Faculty Perceptions and an Effective Methodology , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[3]  Susan M DiBartolomeis,et al.  Apoptosis: a four-week laboratory investigation for advanced molecular and cellular biology students. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[4]  Gili Marbach-Ad,et al.  Improving Scientific Research and Writing Skills through Peer Review and Empirical Group Learning , 2011, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[5]  David W. Gatchell,et al.  A Cognitive-Apprenticeship-Inspired Instructional Approach for Teaching Scientific Writing and Reading. , 2006 .

[6]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Scientific Teaching , 2004, Science.

[7]  P. Brickman,et al.  Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): Measuring Undergraduates’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments , 2012, CBE life sciences education.

[8]  C. Hansel Scientific Teaching , 1972, Nature.

[9]  D. Wink,et al.  Inquiry-based and research-based laboratory pedagogies in undergraduate science. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[10]  Sara E. Brownell,et al.  Undergraduate Biology Lab Courses: Comparing the Impact of Traditionally Based "Cookbook" and Authentic Research-Based Courses on Student Lab Experiences , 2012 .

[11]  Gili Marbach-Ad,et al.  Investigating how streptococcus responds to their environment: bringing together current research, a case study and laboratory investigation. , 2011, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[12]  M. Carless,et al.  Nicotine induces cell proliferation, invasion and epithelial‐mesenchymal transition in a variety of human cancer cell lines , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[13]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda , 2007 .