A Longitudinal Study of E-learning for Construction Management Education

Abstract The aim of this research was to investigate the feasibility, effectiveness and viability of e-learning in construction management education and the students’ preference between e-learning and traditional face-to-face learning. A longitudinal study on e-learning for construction technology courses has been carried out over a period of three years between 2002 and 2004. E-learning modules were developed for an undergraduate third year course Construction Technology and implemented in semester 1 of 2002 and subsequently in 2003 and 2004. Each year, the students enrolled on this course were surveyed prior to and after the e-learning sessions, to identify their knowledge, perceptions and change of attitude towards e-learning. The survey results showed that the majority of students’ knowledge of e-learning has increased and their experience of e-learning has been positive. Furthermore, the students felt it was feasible and effective to use e-learning in construction education. In addition, most students considered that there was little difference in the level of mastery of course contents obtained by e-learning compared with face-to-face method. However, the majority of the students indicated that they would prefer a combination of face-to-face and e-learning methods. Based on the experience gained over the three years, the lecturer (i.e. the author) had also reflected on the process and provided suggestions on how e-learning could be used in the teaching and learning construction technology/management courses. It is concluded that e-learning is feasible and effective for construction management education and is most effective when integrated with face-to-face teaching and learning.

[1]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions , 2003 .

[2]  G. Boulton‐Lewis Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[3]  Roger L. Hayen,et al.  Evaluating E-Learning: A Case Study , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Anne McDougall Guest editorial: assessing learning with ICT , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[5]  Donald J. Mash,et al.  The Graduate Student's Guide to Theses and Dissertations: A Practical Manual for Writing and Research , 1974 .

[6]  Judy A. Serwatka An Empirical assessment of the Assimilation Patterns and the Benefits of Collaborative Information Technologies , 2004 .

[7]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Critical Success Factors for the Online Learner , 2000 .

[8]  Ann Barron,et al.  Designing Web-based Training , 1998, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[9]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom , 1997, CACM.

[10]  Jörgen Lindh,et al.  A dual perspective on a University course , 2004 .

[11]  Kim Bartel Sheehan,et al.  Using E-mail To Survey Internet Users In The United States: Methodology And Assessment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  J. Stratford,et al.  Student perceptions of a virtual field trip to replace a real field trip , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[13]  Keith Smyth,et al.  Expected and Actual Student Use of an Online Learning Environment: A Critical Analysis. , 2004 .

[14]  Roy Rada,et al.  Understanding virtual universities , 2001 .

[15]  Karen S. Nantz,et al.  Student Attitudes toward Internet Courses: A Longitudinal Study , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Ron Oliver,et al.  Student responses to collaborating and learning in a web-based environment , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[17]  Judy A. Serwatka,et al.  Assessment in On-Line CIS Courses , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Bindiganavale S. Vijayaraman,et al.  Status of Master's Programs in Information Systems , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..