Complete characterization of the directly implementable quantum gates used in the IBM quantum processors

Quantum process tomography of each directly implementable quantum gate used in the IBM quantum processors is performed to compute gate error in order to check viability of complex quantum operations in the superconductivity-based quantum computers introduced by IBM and to compare the quality of these gates with the corresponding gates implemented using other technologies. Quantum process tomography (QPT) of C-NOT gates have been performed for three configurations available in IBM QX4 processor. For all the other allowed gates QPT have been performed for every allowed position (i.e., by placing the gates in different qubit lines) for IBM QX4 architecture, and thus, gate fidelities are obtained for both single-qubit and 2-qubit gates. Gate fidelities are observed to be lower than the corresponding values obtained in the other technologies, like NMR. Further, gate fidelities for all the single-qubit gates are obtained for IBM QX2 architecture by placing the gates in the third qubit line ($q[2]$). It's observed that the IBM QX4 architecture yields better gate fidelity compared to IBM QX2 in all cases except the case of $\operatorname{Y}$ gate as far as the gate fidelity corresponding to the third qubit line is concerned. In general, the analysis performed here leads to a conclusion that a considerable technological improvement would be inevitable to achieve the desired scalability required for the realization of complex quantum operations.

[1]  T. Ralph,et al.  Quantum process tomography of a controlled-NOT gate. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[2]  R Hanson,et al.  Bootstrap tomography of the pulses for quantum control. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[3]  Kavita Dorai,et al.  Experimental demonstration of selective quantum process tomography on an NMR quantum information processor , 2017, 1707.06739.

[4]  J. Wrachtrup,et al.  Quantum process tomography and Linblad estimation of a solid-state qubit , 2006, quant-ph/0601167.

[5]  Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano,et al.  Exploiting quantum parallelism of entanglement for a complete experimental quantum characterization of a single-qubit device , 2003 .

[6]  T. Monz,et al.  Process tomography of ion trap quantum gates. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[7]  Isaac L. Chuang,et al.  Prescription for experimental determination of the dynamics of a quantum black box , 1997 .

[8]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets , 2017, Nature.

[9]  Abhishek Shukla,et al.  Design and experimental realization of an optimal scheme for teleportation of an n-qubit quantum state , 2017, Quantum Information Processing.

[10]  Alexandre M. Souza,et al.  Protected quantum computing: interleaving gate operations with dynamical decoupling sequences. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[11]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  NMR Based Quantum Information Processing: Achievements and Prospects , 2000, quant-ph/0004104.

[12]  Bei Zeng,et al.  16-qubit IBM universal quantum computer can be fully entangled , 2018, npj Quantum Information.

[13]  Simon J. Devitt,et al.  Performing Quantum Computing Experiments in the Cloud , 2016, 1605.05709.

[14]  Blake R. Johnson,et al.  Simple all-microwave entangling gate for fixed-frequency superconducting qubits. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[15]  John M. Martinis,et al.  Quantum process tomography of two-qubit controlled-Z and controlled-NOT gates using superconducting phase qubits , 2010, 1006.5084.

[16]  Neil B. Manson,et al.  The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond , 2013, 1302.3288.

[17]  J. P. Home,et al.  Realization of a programmable two-qubit quantum processor , 2009, 0908.3031.

[18]  Bikash K. Behera,et al.  Nondestructive discrimination of a new family of highly entangled states in IBM quantum computer , 2017, Quantum Inf. Process..

[19]  M. Neeley Process Tomography of Quantum Memory in a Josephson Phase Qubit , 2008 .

[20]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Diagnosis, prescription, and prognosis of a bell-state filter by quantum process tomography. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[21]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Quantum Process Tomography: Resource Analysis of Different Strategies , 2007, quant-ph/0702131.

[22]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[23]  Erik Lucero,et al.  High-fidelity gates in a single josephson qubit. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[24]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  Ensemble quantum computing by NMR spectroscopy , 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[25]  P. Zoller,et al.  Complete Characterization of a Quantum Process: The Two-Bit Quantum Gate , 1996, quant-ph/9611013.

[26]  Bikash K. Behera,et al.  Designing quantum router in IBM quantum computer , 2018, Quantum Information Processing.

[27]  Anirban Pathak,et al.  Experimental realization of nondestructive discrimination of Bell states using a five-qubit quantum computer , 2017 .

[28]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Bibliography , 2010 .

[29]  Bikash K. Behera,et al.  Experimental realization of quantum cheque using a five-qubit quantum computer , 2017, Quantum Information Processing.

[30]  Igor Radchenko,et al.  Experimental adaptive process tomography , 2016, 1611.01064.

[31]  M. Mohseni,et al.  Direct characterization of quantum dynamics. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[32]  M. Feng,et al.  Experimental demonstration of simplified quantum process tomography. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[33]  Jens Koch,et al.  Randomized benchmarking and process tomography for gate errors in a solid-state qubit. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[34]  Michele Dall'Arno,et al.  Data-driven inference of physical devices: theory and implementation , 2018, New Journal of Physics.

[35]  A. G. White,et al.  Ancilla-assisted quantum process tomography. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[36]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Quantum process tomography of the quantum Fourier transform. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[37]  D. Leung,et al.  Bulk quantum computation with nuclear magnetic resonance: theory and experiment , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[38]  Debbie W. Leung,et al.  Realization of quantum process tomography in NMR , 2000, quant-ph/0012032.

[39]  P Bertet,et al.  Characterization of a two-transmon processor with individual single-shot qubit readout. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[40]  Ny,et al.  Quantum process tomography of a universal entangling gate implemented with Josephson phase qubits , 2009, 0910.1118.

[41]  R. L. Kosut,et al.  Simplified quantum process tomography , 2009, 0910.4609.

[42]  T. S. Mahesh,et al.  Single-scan quantum process tomography , 2014, 1404.7830.