Crossing the divide: infants discriminate small from large numerosities.

Although young infants have repeatedly demonstrated successful numerosity discrimination across large sets when the number of items in the sets changes twofold (E. M. Brannon, S. Abbott, & D. J. Lutz, 2004; J. N. Wood & E. S. Spelke, 2005; F. Xu & E. S. Spelke, 2000), they consistently fail to discriminate a twofold change in number when one set is large and the other is small (<4 items; F. Feigenson, S. Carey, & M. Hauser, 2002; F. Xu, 2003). It has been theorized that this failure reflects an incompatibility in representational systems for small and large sets. The authors investigated the ability of 7-month-old infants to compare small and large sets over a variety of conditions. Results reveal that infants can successfully discriminate small from large sets when given a fourfold change, but not a twofold change, in number. The implications of these results are discussed in light of current theories of number representation.

[1]  N. Stanietsky,et al.  The interaction of TIGIT with PVR and PVRL2 inhibits human NK cell cytotoxicity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[3]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Discrimination of Large and Small Numerosities by Human Infants , 2004 .

[4]  S. Carey,et al.  On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays , 2005, Cognition.

[5]  J. Kagan,et al.  Effect of Auditory Numerical Information on Infants ' Looking Behavior : Contradictory Evidence , 2004 .

[6]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  The Young Numerical Mind: When Does It Count? , 2005 .

[7]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Susan Carey,et al.  What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge , 1999 .

[9]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Number bias for the discrimination of large visual sets in infancy , 2004, Cognition.

[11]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[12]  Thomas K. Landauer,et al.  Determinants of reaction time for digit inequality judgments , 1973 .

[13]  E. Spelke,et al.  Detection of intermodal numerical correspondences by human infants. , 1983, Science.

[14]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[15]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Subitizing: Magical numbers or mere superstition? , 1992, Psychological research.

[16]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Numerical abstraction in infants: another look. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[17]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Do infants understand simple arithmetic? A replication of Wynn (1992) ☆ , 1995 .

[18]  Fei Xu,et al.  Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations , 2003, Cognition.

[19]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Linking visual attention and number processing in the brain : the role of the right temporo-parietal junction in small and large non-symbolic number comparison , 2007 .

[20]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[21]  S. Carey,et al.  The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes , 2002, Psychological science.

[22]  Sara Cordes,et al.  The relative salience of discrete and continuous quantity in young infants. , 2009, Developmental science.

[23]  Jamie I. D. Campbell.  Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[24]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Small and large number processing in infants and toddlers with Williams syndrome. , 2008, Developmental science.

[25]  P. MacNeilage,et al.  Numerical representations in primates. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  E. Brannon,et al.  The difficulties of representing continuous extent in infancy: using number is just easier. , 2008, Child development.

[27]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[28]  E. Spelke,et al.  Infants' Discrimination of Number vs. Continuous Extent , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking Multiple Items Through Occlusion: Clues to Visual Objecthood , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[31]  E. Brannon,et al.  Quantitative competencies in infancy. , 2008, Developmental science.

[32]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Amount Versus Number: Infants' Use of Area and Contour Length to Discriminate Small Sets , 2001 .

[33]  S. Dehaene.  Single-Neuron Arithmetic , 2002, Science.

[34]  Kazuo Hiraki,et al.  Auditory-visual intermodal matching of small numerosities in 6-month-old infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[35]  E. Spelke,et al.  Numerical abstraction by human infants , 1990, Cognition.

[36]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  The multisensory representation of number in infancy. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Fei Xu,et al.  Number sense in human infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[38]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children , 2006, Cognition.

[39]  Susan C. Levine,et al.  Quantitative Development in Infancy and Early Childhood , 2002 .

[40]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Number Versus Contour Length in Infants' Discrimination of Small Visual Sets , 1999 .

[41]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Enumeration of collective entities by 5-month-old infants , 2002, Cognition.

[42]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[43]  D. Moore,et al.  Perception precedes computation: can familiarity preferences explain apparent calculation by human babies? , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[44]  Fei Xu,et al.  Number discrimination in 10-month-old infants , 2007 .

[45]  A. Streri,et al.  Evidence of amodal representation of small numbers across visuo-tactile modalities in 5-month-old infants , 2006 .

[46]  Lisa Feigenson,et al.  Tracking individuals via object-files: evidence from infants' manual search , 2003 .

[47]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[48]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  The development of ordinal numerical knowledge in infancy , 2002, Cognition.

[50]  H S Terrace,et al.  Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. , 1998, Science.

[51]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[52]  J. Cantlon,et al.  Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans , 2006, Psychological science.

[53]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[54]  Justin N Wood,et al.  Infants' enumeration of actions: numerical discrimination and its signature limits. , 2005, Developmental science.