Periodicity in generations of automata

A class of automata which build other automata is defined. These automata are called Turing machine automata because each one contains a Turing machine which acts as its computer-brain and which completely determines what its offspring, if any, will be. We show that for the descendants of an arbitrary progenitor Turing machine automaton there are exactly three possibilities: (1) there is a sterile descendant after an arbitrary number of generations, (2) after a delay of an arbitrary number of generations, the descendants repeat in generations with an arbitrary period, or (3) the descendants are aperiodic. We also show what sort of computing ability may be realized by the descendants in each of the possibilities. Furthermore, it is determined whether there are effective procedures for distinguishing between the various possibilities, and the exact degree of unsolvability is computed for those decision problems for which there is no effective procedure. Lastly, we discuss the relevance of the results to biology and pose several questions.

[1]  E. R. Banks INFORMATION PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION IN CELLULAR AUTOMATA , 1971 .

[2]  J. M. Smith What use is sex? , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  P. Vitányi Sexually Reproducing Cellular Automata * , 2022 .

[4]  A. Lindenmayer Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development. I. Filaments with one-sided inputs. , 1968, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  Richard A. Laing,et al.  Asexual and sexual reproduction expressed in the Von Neumann cellular system formalisms for living systems part I, sections 9.2, 9.3, and 9.4 , 1970 .

[6]  G. Herman Computing ability of a developmental model for filamentous organisms. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Dirk van Dalen A note on some systems of lindenmayer , 2005, Mathematical systems theory.

[8]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Automata theory and development: Part I , 1967 .

[9]  B. Sendov,et al.  Possible molecular mechanism for cell differentiation in multicellular organisms. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  A. Turing The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[11]  Jr. Hartley Rogers Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability , 1969 .

[12]  Jeffrey W. Roberts,et al.  遺伝子の分子生物学 = Molecular biology of the gene , 1970 .

[13]  E. F. Codd,et al.  Cellular automata , 1968 .

[14]  A. Lindenmayer Developmental systems without cellular interactions, their languages and grammars. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Theories of abstract automata , 1969, Prentice-Hall series in automatic computation.

[16]  Arthur W. Burks,et al.  Essays on cellular automata , 1970 .

[17]  Nancy M. Jessop Biosphere; a study of life , 1970 .

[18]  Aristid Lindenmayer,et al.  Mathematical Models for Cellular Interactions in Development , 1968 .

[19]  John Case,et al.  A Note on Degrees of Self-Describing Turing Machines , 1971, JACM.

[20]  Edwin Roger Banks Universality in Cellular Automata , 1970, SWAT.