Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics

The growth rate‐dependent regulation of cell size, ribosomal content, and metabolic efficiency follows a common pattern in unicellular organisms: with increasing growth rates, cell size and ribosomal content increase and a shift to energetically inefficient metabolism takes place. The latter two phenomena are also observed in fast growing tumour cells and cell lines. These patterns suggest a fundamental principle of design. In biology such designs can often be understood as the result of the optimization of fitness. Here we show that in basic models of self‐replicating systems these patterns are the consequence of maximizing the growth rate. Whereas most models of cellular growth consider a part of physiology, for instance only metabolism, the approach presented here integrates several subsystems to a complete self‐replicating system. Such models can yield fundamentally different optimal strategies. In particular, it is shown how the shift in metabolic efficiency originates from a tradeoff between investments in enzyme synthesis and metabolic yields for alternative catabolic pathways. The models elucidate how the optimization of growth by natural selection shapes growth strategies.

[1]  J. Monod The Growth of Bacterial Cultures , 1949 .

[2]  O. Warburg [Origin of cancer cells]. , 1956, Oncologia.

[3]  O. Warburg On the origin of cancer cells. , 1956, Science.

[4]  O. Maaløe,et al.  Dependency on medium and temperature of cell size and chemical composition during balanced grown of Salmonella typhimurium. , 1958, Journal of general microbiology.

[5]  W. Donachie,et al.  Growth of the Bacterial Cell , 1970, Nature.

[6]  J. Foker,et al.  Aerobic glycolysis during lymphocyte proliferation , 1976, Nature.

[7]  K. Gausing Regulation of ribosome production in Escherichia coli: synthesis and stability of ribosomal RNA and of ribosomal protein messenger RNA at different growth rates. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  P. Nurse,et al.  Control of cell size at division in fission yeast by a growth-modulated size control over nuclear division. , 1977, Experimental cell research.

[9]  F. Neidhardt,et al.  Patterns of protein synthesis in E. coli: a catalog of the amount of 140 individual proteins at different growth rates , 1978, Cell.

[10]  D. Ellwood,et al.  Change from Homo- to Heterolactic Fermentation by Streptococcus lactis Resulting from Glucose Limitation in Anaerobic Chemostat Cultures , 1979, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  W. Mckeehan,et al.  Glycolysis, glutaminolysis and cell proliferation. , 1982, Cell biology international reports.

[12]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Costs of accuracy determined by a maximal growth rate constraint , 1984, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[13]  J. Adams,et al.  Evolution of Escherichia coli during growth in a constant environment. , 1987, Genetics.

[14]  A. L. Koch,et al.  Why can't a cell grow infinitely fast? , 1988, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[15]  C. Kurland,et al.  Selection of laboratory wild-type phenotype from natural isolates of Escherichia coli in chemostats. , 1992, Molecular biology and evolution.

[16]  B. Palsson,et al.  Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110 , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[17]  Richard E. Lenski,et al.  Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. II. Changes in Life-History Traits During Adaptation to a Seasonal Environment , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[18]  R. Lenski,et al.  Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R. Lenski,et al.  Experimental rejection of a nonadaptive explanation for increased cell size in Escherichia coli , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  P. Brown,et al.  Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. , 1997, Science.

[21]  M. J. Teixeira de Mattos,et al.  Bioenergetic consequences of microbial adaptation to low-nutrient environments. , 1997, Journal of biotechnology.

[22]  J. Pronk,et al.  Effect of Specific Growth Rate on Fermentative Capacity of Baker’s Yeast , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  C. Brown,et al.  Multiple duplications of yeast hexose transport genes in response to selection in a glucose-limited environment. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  Frederick C. Neidhardt,et al.  Bacterial Growth: Constant Obsession withdN/dt , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  Francisco Montero,et al.  Optimization of glycolysis: new discussions , 1999 .

[26]  B. Palsson,et al.  In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  J. Diderich,et al.  Physiological Properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from Which Hexokinase II Has Been Deleted , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[28]  S. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Cooperation and Competition in the Evolution of ATP-Producing Pathways , 2001, Science.

[29]  Lubert Stryer,et al.  Biochemistry 5th ed , 2002 .

[30]  U. Sauer,et al.  Metabolic Flux Responses to Pyruvate Kinase Knockout in Escherichia coli , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[31]  B. Palsson,et al.  Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth , 2002, Nature.

[32]  Kenneth J. Kauffman,et al.  Advances in flux balance analysis. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[33]  Peter Neubauer,et al.  Limiting factors in Escherichia coli fed-batch production of recombinant proteins. , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[34]  P. Pandolfi,et al.  Does the ribosome translate cancer? , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[35]  B. Palsson,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraint-based analysis of a genome-scale reconstructed metabolic network , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  D. Tempest,et al.  The role of energy-spilling reactions in the growth ofKlebsiella aerogenes NCTC 418 in aerobic chemostat culture , 1976, Archives of Microbiology.

[37]  Jack T. Pronk,et al.  Kinetics of growth and sugar consumption in yeasts , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[38]  B. Palsson,et al.  Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[39]  D. Tempest,et al.  The regulation of carbohydrate metabolism in Klebsiella aerogenes NCTC 418 organisms, growing in chemostat culture , 1975, Archives of Microbiology.

[40]  S. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Evolution of Cross‐Feeding in Microbial Populations , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[41]  S. Schuster,et al.  Game-theoretical approaches to studying the evolution of biochemical systems. , 2005, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[42]  U. Alon,et al.  Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein , 2005, Nature.

[43]  Jochen Förster,et al.  Modeling Lactococcus lactis using a genome-scale flux model , 2005, BMC Microbiology.

[44]  Ole Winther,et al.  Growth-rate regulated genes have profound impact on interpretation of transcriptome profiling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Genome Biology.

[45]  A. Khodursky,et al.  Overflow Metabolism in Escherichia coli during Steady-State Growth: Transcriptional Regulation and Effect of the Redox Ratio , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[46]  J. Heijnen,et al.  In vivo kinetics of primary metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae studied through prolonged chemostat cultivation. , 2006, Metabolic engineering.

[47]  Bas Teusink,et al.  Analysis of Growth of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 on a Complex Medium Using a Genome-scale Metabolic Model* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  J. Piškur,et al.  How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[49]  R. MacLean,et al.  Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast , 2006, Nature.

[50]  P. Leder,et al.  Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[51]  Lisbeth Olsson,et al.  A systems biology approach to study glucose repression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[52]  M. A. de Menezes,et al.  Intracellular crowding defines the mode and sequence of substrate uptake by Escherichia coli and constrains its metabolic activity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Ziv Bar-Joseph,et al.  Impact of the solvent capacity constraint on E. coli metabolism , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[54]  L. Olsson,et al.  Increasing NADH oxidation reduces overflow metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  R. MacLean,et al.  Constraints on microbial metabolism drive evolutionary diversification in homogeneous environments , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[56]  A. Sonenshein,et al.  Control of key metabolic intersections in Bacillus subtilis , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[57]  Matthew J. Brauer,et al.  Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. , 2008, Molecular biology of the cell.

[58]  D. Fell,et al.  Is maximization of molar yield in metabolic networks favoured by evolution? , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[59]  D. Sabatini,et al.  Cancer Cell Metabolism: Warburg and Beyond , 2008, Cell.

[60]  G. F. Joyce,et al.  Self-Sustained Replication of an RNA Enzyme , 2009, Science.