The persuasive effects of personalization through: name mentioning in a smoking cessation message

Mentioning the recipient’s name in a persuasive message is one way to personalize messages in an attempt to increase persuasion. However, this type of personalization may lead to a self-threat that activates defensive reactions and to a subsequent decrease in persuasion. A self-affirmation procedure that induces open-mindedness may prevent this drawback. Smokers were exposed to a message advocating smoking cessation in one of three experimental conditions presenting: A standard text, a text with the recipient’s name incorporated four times, or a text with the recipient’s name incorporated twelve times. The extent to which smokers indicated at pretest to value their health was used as a measure of personal relevance of the message, and tested as a moderator. Half of the smokers was exposed to a self-affirmation procedure before they read the text. The dependent variable was the intention to quit smoking. When health value was moderate, mentioning the recipient’s name twelve times induced a defensive reaction, significantly lowering persuasion. This was supported by the observation that self-affirmation prevented this effect. When health value was high, mentioning the recipient’s name twelve times significantly increased persuasion. However, when self-affirmation was applied, persuasion was significantly lowered. The effects of mentioning the recipient’s name depend on individual differences in personal relevance of the message (health value) before exposure to the message: Name mentioning can increase, but also decrease persuasion, through defensive processes.

[1]  Ron Borland,et al.  The effectiveness of personally tailored computer-generated advice letters for smoking cessation. , 2004, Addiction.

[2]  Jean-François Etter,et al.  Internet-based smoking cessation programs , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[3]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Modeling the efficacy of persuasive strategies for different gamer types in serious games for health , 2014, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[4]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. , 2008, Health education research.

[5]  V. Strecher,et al.  The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings. , 1994, The Journal of family practice.

[6]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition Versus Integration , 1990 .

[7]  Peter R. Harris,et al.  Self-Affirmation and the Biased Processing of Threatening Health-Risk Information , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[8]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Tailoring information to enhance quitting in smokers with low motivation to quit: three basic efficacy questions. , 1998, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[9]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Effects of Self-Referencing on Persuasion , 1995 .

[10]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  When Beliefs Yield to Evidence: Reducing Biased Evaluation by Affirming the Self , 2000 .

[11]  Ehud Reiter,et al.  Lessons from a failure: Generating tailored smoking cessation letters , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[12]  W. Klein,et al.  Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic review , 2006 .

[13]  A. Dijkstra,et al.  Self-evaluative emotions and expectations about self-evaluative emotions in health-behaviour change. , 2008, The British journal of social psychology.

[14]  Glenn Leshner,et al.  Scare' Em or Disgust 'Em: The Effects of Graphic Health Promotion Messages , 2009, Health communication.

[15]  Chingching Chang Enhancing Self‐Referencing to Health Messages , 2011 .

[16]  Arie Dijkstra,et al.  Personalization and perceived personal relevance in computer-tailored persuasion in smoking cessation. , 2012, British journal of health psychology.

[17]  Peter R Harris,et al.  Self-affirmation reduces smokers' defensiveness to graphic on-pack cigarette warning labels. , 2007, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[18]  Fred Vultee,et al.  When a Fear Appeal Isn't Just a Fear Appeal: The Effects of Graphic Anti-tobacco Messages , 2010 .

[19]  Brenda J. Cude,et al.  ‘Hello, Mrs. Sarah Jones! We recommend this product!’ Consumers' perceptions about personalized advertising: comparisons across advertisements delivered via three different types of media , 2009 .

[20]  G. Kok,et al.  Self-Evaluation and Motivation To Change: Social Cognitive Constructs In Smoking Cessation , 1999 .

[21]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Moderators of the Impact of Self-Reference on Persuasion , 1996 .

[22]  Roger A. Kerin,et al.  The Effects of Personalized Product Recommendations on Advertisement Response Rates: The “Try This. It Works!” Technique , 2004 .

[23]  T. Brandon,et al.  Tailored interventions for motivating smoking cessation: using placebo tailoring to examine the influence of expectancies and personalization. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[24]  Arie Dijkstra,et al.  Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation. , 2005, Health education research.

[25]  G. Āllport,et al.  Study Of Values , 1931 .

[26]  Eun-Yeong Na Is Biased Processing of Strong Attitudes Peripheral? An Extension of the Dual Process Models of Attitude Change , 1999 .

[27]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  The self in social psychology. , 1999 .

[28]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  The self-reference effect in memory: a meta-analysis. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Arie Dijkstra,et al.  Do behavioural health intentions engender health behaviour change? A study on the moderating role of self-affirmation on actual fruit intake versus vegetable intake. , 2011, British journal of health psychology.

[30]  H. Rao Unnava,et al.  Self-Referencing , 1989 .

[31]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  The Role of Engagement in a Tailored Web-Based Smoking Cessation Program: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[32]  Enny Das,et al.  How self-affirmation reduces defensive processing of threatening health information: evidence at the implicit level. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[33]  Peter R Harris,et al.  Evidence that self-affirmation reduces alcohol consumption: randomized exploratory trial with a new, brief means of self-affirming. , 2011, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[34]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Effects of involvement on persuasion: a meta-analysis , 1989 .

[35]  Lisa G. Aspinwall,et al.  Self-Affirmation Reduces Biased Processing of Health-Risk Information , 1998 .

[36]  Sander L. Koole,et al.  The Cessation of Rumination Through Self-Affirmation , 1999 .

[37]  M. Zanna,et al.  An affirmed self and an open mind: Self-affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength. , 2004 .

[38]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[39]  Arie Dukstra,et al.  Physical threat and self-evaluative emotions in smoking cessation , 2005 .

[40]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  The Psychology of Self‐defense: Self‐Affirmation Theory , 2006 .

[41]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[43]  Arie Dijkstra,et al.  The Psychology of Tailoring-Ingredients in Computer-Tailored Persuasion , 2008 .

[44]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  A Dijkstra,et al.  Long-term effectiveness of computer-generated tailored feedback in smoking cessation. , 1998, Health education research.

[46]  S. Noar,et al.  Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Hermie Hermens,et al.  Tailoring real-time physical activity coaching systems: a literature survey and model , 2014, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[48]  O. Postma,et al.  Personalisation in practice: The proven effects of personalisation , 2002 .

[49]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Do Messages about Health Risks Threaten the Self? Increasing the Acceptance of Threatening Health Messages Via Self-Affirmation , 2000 .

[50]  A. Eagly In defence of ourselves: The effects of defensive processing on attitudinal phenomena , 2007 .

[51]  C. Steele The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[52]  S. Pietersma Persuasive health communication : A self-perspective , 2009 .

[53]  P. Sparks,et al.  Motivational and behavioural consequences of self-affirmation interventions: A study of sunscreen use among women , 2009, Psychology & health.

[54]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  Undoing the Effects of Seizing and Freezing: Decreasing Defensive Processing of Personally Relevant Messages , 2002 .