On the sensitivity of surface NMR in the presence of electrical conductivity anomalies

SUMMARY The surface-NMR tomography technique is based on the principles of electromagnetic induction and proton spin dynamics. Electromagnetic fields emitted by large surface current-driven loops are employed to locate and quantify groundwater reservoirs. The oscillating magnetic fields interact with proton spins of water molecules in the electrically conductive subsurface. To study the influence of changing subsurface electrical properties on the nuclear spin response, we consider the spin magnetization as a virtual magnetic dipole receiver. The numerical solutions for the electric and magnetic fields of the transmitter and the virtual receiver in 3-D heterogeneous ground are based on the finite-element method. We explicitly compute the frequency-domain electromagnetic sensitivities for separate spin magnetizations in a groundwater aquifer to study the distortion of the NMR response because of electrical heterogeneities in the medium. Analyses of entire pulse moment sequences yield the cumulative sensitivities to electrical conductivity and water-content variations in the subsurface. We illustrate the influence of conductivity on NMR responses using a limited number of models. From these models we found that electrical conductivity anomalies in the shallow subsurface (<50 m) having values ≥0.1 S m–1 and volumes with linear dimensions in the order of our loop size (i.e. edge length 100 m) can have a strong influence on the NMR response and ought to be taken into account in the inversion of surface-NMR data. The effect increases non-linearly with increased body size, increased conductivity contrast and decreased anomaly depth.

[1]  O. Shushakov Groundwater NMR in conductive water , 1996 .

[2]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Off-resonance effects in surface nuclear magnetic resonance , 2011 .

[3]  J. Hand Modelling the interaction of electromagnetic fields (10 MHz–10 GHz) with the human body: methods and applications , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  METHODS FOR CALCULATING FRÉCHET DERIVATIVES AND SENSITIVITIES FOR THE NON‐LINEAR INVERSE PROBLEM: A COMPARATIVE STUDY1 , 1990 .

[5]  Vladimir Grechka This issue of GEOPHYSICS , 2010 .

[6]  R. Wooding,et al.  Convection in groundwater below an evaporating Salt Lake: 2. Evolution of fingers or plumes , 1997 .

[7]  M. Levitt Spin Dynamics: Basics of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 2001 .

[8]  C-N. Chen,et al.  Biomedical magnetic resonance technology , 1989 .

[9]  A. N. Garroway,et al.  Surface and gradiometer coils near a conducting body: the lift-off effect. , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[10]  David B. Davidson,et al.  Computational Electromagnetics for RF and Microwave Engineering , 2005 .

[11]  Marian Hertrich,et al.  Imaging of groundwater with nuclear magnetic resonance , 2008 .

[12]  Anatoly Legchenko,et al.  A review of the basic principles for proton magnetic resonance sounding measurements , 2002 .

[13]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  Study on complex inversion of magnetic resonance sounding signals , 2005 .

[14]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[15]  F David Doty,et al.  Radio frequency coil technology for small‐animal MRI , 2007, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  Stewart A. Greenhalgh,et al.  Three-Dimensional Magnetic Field and NMR Sensitivity Computations Incorporating Conductivity Anomalies and Variable-Surface Topography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  D. A. Dunnett Classical Electrodynamics , 2020, Nature.

[18]  Misac N. Nabighian,et al.  Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics , 1988 .

[19]  Weichman,et al.  Theory of surface nuclear magnetic resonance with applications to geophysical imaging problems , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[20]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  Calculation of sensitivities for the frequency-domain electromagnetic problem , 1994 .

[21]  A. Kepic,et al.  Surface nuclear magnetic resonance signal contribution in conductive terrains , 2005 .

[22]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  Inversion of resistivity in Magnetic Resonance Sounding , 2008 .

[23]  Alan G. Green,et al.  High-resolution surface NMR tomography of shallow aquifers based on multioffset measurements , 2009 .

[24]  Thomas Günther,et al.  Surface Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Tomography , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  D. Hoult The principle of reciprocity in signal strength calculations—a mathematical guide , 2000 .

[26]  Michael S. Zhdanov,et al.  Geophysical Electromagnetic Theory and Methods , 2009 .

[27]  A. Gow,et al.  Thickness, structure, and properties of level summer multiyear ice in the Eurasian sector of the Arctic Ocean , 1995 .

[28]  Esben Auken,et al.  A resolution study of buried valleys using laterally constrained inversion of TEM data , 2008 .

[29]  Jian-Ming Jin,et al.  The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics , 1993 .

[30]  Daniel A. White,et al.  A high order mixed vector finite element method for solving the time dependent Maxwell equations on unstructured grids , 2005 .