Augmented Reality for Teaching Science Vocabulary to Postsecondary Education Students With Intellectual Disabilities and Autism

Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the use of an emerging technology called augmented reality to teach science vocabulary words to college students with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorders. One student with autism and three students with an intellectual disability participated in a multiple probe across behaviors (i.e., acquisition of science vocabulary words) design. Data were collected on each student's ability to define and label three sets of science vocabulary words (i.e., bones, organs, and plant cells). The results indicate that all students acquired definition and labeling knowledge for the new science vocabulary terms. Results are discussed in the context of applying universal design principles with emerging technologies to create authentic opportunities for students with intellectual disabilities and autism spectrum disorders to learn science vocabulary. (Keywords: augmented reality, autism, intellectual disability, science vocabulary, universal design for learning)

[1]  D. Massaro,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Computer-Animated Tutor for Vocabulary and Language Learning in Children with Autism , 2003, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[2]  Don D. McMahon,et al.  Augmented Reality as a Navigation Tool to Employment Opportunities for Postsecondary Education Students With Intellectual Disabilities and Autism , 2015 .

[3]  S. Bonichini,et al.  Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (Vineland-II) – Survey Form. Adattamento italiano , 2016 .

[4]  Ron Dumont,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson III Tests Of Cognitive Abilities , 2014 .

[5]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Context-aware support for computer-supported ubiquitous learning , 2004, The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings..

[6]  Fred Spooner,et al.  Research on Reading Instruction for Individuals with Significant Cognitive Disabilities , 2006 .

[7]  Alan B. Craig.  Understanding Augmented Reality: Concepts and Applications , 2013 .

[8]  Using Technology to Support Balanced Literacy for Students with Significant Disabilities , 2012 .

[9]  Domenic V. Cicchetti,et al.  Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition , 2012 .

[10]  B. C. Karren.  A Test Review: Gilliam, J. E. (2014). Gilliam Autism Rating Scale–Third Edition (GARS-3) , 2017 .

[11]  Pamela J. Mims,et al.  Using Shared Stories and Individual Response Modes to Promote Comprehension and Engagement in Literacy for Students with Multiple, Severe Disabilities , 2011 .

[12]  Siegfried Engelmann,et al.  Research on Direct Instruction: 25 Years beyond DISTAR. , 1996 .

[13]  Bethany R. Smith,et al.  Using Embedded Computer-Assisted Instruction to Teach Science to Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. , 2012 .

[14]  Claudia Flowers,et al.  Teaching Mathematics and Science Standards to Students With Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities , 2012 .

[15]  John O. Willis,et al.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Third Edition , 2008 .

[16]  Susan A. Yoon,et al.  Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum , 2012, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[17]  Maya Israel,et al.  Promoting Literacy-Embedded, Authentic STEM Instruction for Students with Disabilities and other Struggling Learners , 2013 .

[18]  John O. Willis,et al.  Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition , 2014 .

[19]  M. Wehmeyer.  Beyond Access: Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum for Students with Severe Disabilities , 2006 .

[20]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[21]  R. P. Fishburne,et al.  Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel , 1975 .

[22]  Karen A Erickson,et al.  The Vocabulary of Beginning Writers: Implications for Children with Complex Communication Needs , 2008, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[23]  D. Langenberg.  Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction , 2000 .

[24]  R. Allen,et al.  Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition , 2011 .

[25]  M. Wolf,et al.  Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. , 1978, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[26]  Alan S. Kaufman,et al.  Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition , 2014 .

[27]  F. Spooner,et al.  Review of Studies with Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities Which Link to Science Standards , 2007 .

[28]  Woori Kim,et al.  Critical Factors in Reading Comprehension Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Research Synthesis , 2012 .

[29]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  How to Summarize Single-Participant Research: Ideas and Applications , 2001, The Meta-Analysis Research in Special Education.

[30]  Randall B. Boone,et al.  Emergent Literacy Skills of Preschool Students with Autism: A Comparison of Teacher-Led and Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 2011 .

[31]  C. Snow,et al.  Reading Next: A Vision for Action and Research in Middle and High School Literacy , 2004 .

[32]  David H. Rose,et al.  Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning , 2002 .

[33]  F. Spooner,et al.  Aligning Instruction with Academic Content Standards: Finding the Link , 2006 .

[34]  Fred Spooner,et al.  Using Time Delay to Teach Literacy to Students with Severe Developmental Disabilities , 2009 .

[35]  S. Gehlert,et al.  Symptom patterns of premenstrual dysphoric disorder as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV. , 1999, Journal of women's health.

[36]  Don D. McMahon,et al.  Using a Mobile App to Teach Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities to Identify Potential Food Allergens , 2013 .

[37]  Using an iTouch to Teach Core Curriculum Words and Definitions: Efficacy and Social Validity , 2012 .

[38]  Richard T. Boon,et al.  Use of Kidspiration[C] Software to Enhance the Reading Comprehension of Story Grammar Components for Elementary-Age Students with Specific Learning Disabilities , 2010 .

[39]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  The Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research , 1987 .

[40]  Judith Wylie,et al.  Assistive Software Tools for Secondary-Level Students with Literacy Difficulties , 2006 .

[41]  David L. Gast,et al.  Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences , 2010 .

[42]  Jyh-Chong Liang,et al.  Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[43]  C. Kliewer.  Citizenship in the Literate Community: An Ethnography of Children with down Syndrome and the Written Word , 1998 .

[44]  David L. Gast,et al.  Multiple Baseline and Multiple Probe Designs , 2009 .

[45]  P. Richard,et al.  Augmented Reality for Rehabilitation of Cognitive Disabled Children: A Preliminary Study , 2007, 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[46]  Tracey E. Hall,et al.  Computer Assisted Instruction in Reading for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Research Synthesis. , 2000 .

[47]  Janet B W Williams.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[48]  David Reinking,et al.  The Effects of Computer-Mediated Text on Measures of Reading Comprehension and Reading Behavior , 1985 .

[49]  Mary Wagner,et al.  The Post-High School Outcomes of Young Adults with Disabilities up to 8 Years after High School: A Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2011-3005. , 2011 .