Fifty Years of Quasars: Physical Insights and Potential for Cosmology

Last year (2013) was more or less the 50th anniversary of the discovery of quasars. It is an interesting time to review what we know (and don't know) about them both empirically and theoretically. These compact sources involving line emitting plasma show extraordinary luminosities extending to one thousand times that of our Milky Way in emitting volumes of a few solar system diameters (bolometric luminosity log L$_{bol} \sim $ 44-48 [erg s$^{-1}$]: D=1-3 light months $\sim$ $10^3$ - $10^4$ gravitational radii). The advent of 8-10 meter class telescopes enables us to study them spectroscopically in ever greater detail. In 2000 we introduced a 4D Eigenvector 1 parameters space involving optical, UV and X-Ray measures designed to serve as a 4D equivalent of the 2D Hertzsprung-Russell diagram so important for depicting the diversity of stellar types and evolutionary states. This diagram has revealed a principal sequence of quasars distinguished by Eddington ratio (proportional to the accretion rate per unit mass). Thus while stellar differences are primarily driven by the mass of a star, quasar differences are apparently driven by the ratio of luminosity-to-mass. Out of this work has emerged the concept of two quasars populations A and B separated at Eddington ratio around 0.2 which maximizes quasar multispectral differences. The mysterious 8% of quasars that are radio-loud belong to population B which are the lowest accretors with the largest black hole masses. Finally we consider the most extreme population A quasars which are the highest accretors and in some cases are among the youngest quasars. We describe how these sources might be exploited as standard candles for cosmology.

[1]  M. Schoeller,et al.  The central dusty torus in the active nucleus of NGC 1068 , 2004, Nature.

[2]  Knud Jahnke,et al.  Discovery of a bright quasar without a massive host galaxy , 2005, Nature.

[3]  T. Zwitter,et al.  Searching for the Physical Drivers of the Eigenvector 1 Correlation Space , 2001, astro-ph/0105343.

[4]  M. D’Onofrio,et al.  Fifty years of quasars : from early observations and ideas to future research , 2012 .

[5]  P. Marziani,et al.  VLT/ISAAC spectra of the Hβ region in intermediate-redshift quasars II. Black hole mass and Eddington ratio , , 2004, 0812.0251.

[6]  D. Valls-Gabaud,et al.  Super-Eddington accreting massive black holes as long-lived cosmological standards. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[7]  D. Dultzin.  Narrow-Line Seyfert 1s: a luminosity dependent definition , 2011 .

[8]  K. M. Merrill,et al.  Compact extragalactic nonthermal sources. , 1972 .

[9]  Granada,et al.  Detailed characterization of Hβ emission line profile in low‐z SDSS quasars , 2009, 0912.4306.

[10]  T. Lauer,et al.  Observing Dark Energy , 2005 .

[11]  M. Schmidt,et al.  3C 273 : A Star-Like Object with Large Red-Shift , 1963, Nature.

[12]  P. Marziani,et al.  Highly accreting quasars: sample definition and possible cosmological implications , 2014, 1405.2727.

[13]  Ž. Ivezić,et al.  AGN Dusty Tori. II. Observational Implications of Clumpiness , 2008, 0806.0512.

[14]  R. Zamanov,et al.  Kinematic Linkage between the Broad- and Narrow-Line-emitting Gas in Active Galactic Nuclei , 2002, astro-ph/0207387.

[15]  D. Lynden-Bell,et al.  Galactic Nuclei as Collapsed Old Quasars , 1969, Nature.

[16]  T. Boroson,et al.  The Emission-Line Properties of Low-Redshift Quasi-stellar Objects , 1992 .

[17]  Ljubljana,et al.  The Demise of the Classical Broad-Line Region in the Luminous Quasar PG 1416–129 , 2000, astro-ph/0009326.

[18]  T. Zwitter,et al.  An Optical Spectroscopic Atlas of Low-Redshift Active Galactic Nuclei , 2003 .

[19]  THE QUASI-STELLAR RADIO SOURCES 3C 48 AND 3C 273 , 1964 .

[20]  E. Branchini,et al.  A NEW COSMOLOGICAL DISTANCE MEASURE USING ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS X-RAY VARIABILITY , 2014, 1404.2607.

[21]  Richard G. McMahon,et al.  A luminous quasar at a redshift of z = 7.085 , 2011, Nature.

[22]  P. Marziani,et al.  Phenomenology of Broad Emission Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei , 2000 .

[23]  J. Lasota,et al.  Slim Accretion Disks , 1988 .

[24]  Maarten Schmidt,et al.  Space Distribution and Luminosity Functions of Quasi-Stellar Radio Sources , 1968 .

[25]  P. Marziani,et al.  Comparative Analysis of the High- and Low-Ionization Lines in the Broad-Line Region of Active Galactic Nuclei , 1996 .

[26]  R. Zamanov,et al.  Average Quasar Spectra in the Context of Eigenvector 1 , 2002, astro-ph/0201362.

[27]  S. Bianchi.  A new cosmological distance measure using AGN X-ray variability , 2014 .

[28]  Martin P. Ward,et al.  Seyfert galaxies as X-ray sources , 1978 .

[29]  D. Dultzin,et al.  BROAD-LINE REGION PHYSICAL CONDITIONS IN EXTREME POPULATION A QUASARS: A METHOD TO ESTIMATE CENTRAL BLACK HOLE MASS AT HIGH REDSHIFT , 2011, 1107.3188.

[30]  M. Calvani,et al.  VLT/ISAAC spectra of the Hβ region in intermediate redshift quasars , 2004 .

[31]  D. Dultzin,et al.  C IV λ1549 as an Eigenvector 1 Parameter for Active Galactic Nuclei , 2007, 0705.1895.

[32]  J. H. Mack,et al.  DETECTION OF X-RAY EMISSION FROM 3C 273 AND NGC 5128. , 1970 .

[33]  A. Laor.  On the Nature of Low-Luminosity Narrow-Line Active Galactic Nuclei , 2003, astro-ph/0302541.

[34]  J. Sulentic.  Toward a classification scheme for broad-line profiles in active galactic nuclei , 1989 .

[35]  M. D’Onofrio,et al.  Fifty Years of Quasars , 2012 .

[36]  Searching for the physical drivers of eigenvector 1: influence of black hole mass and Eddington ratio , 2003, astro-ph/0307367.

[37]  C. K. Seyfert.  Nuclear Emission in Spiral Nebulae. , 1943 .

[38]  P. Marziani,et al.  Quasar Outflows: in the 4D Eigenvector 1 Context , 2012, 1210.2059.

[39]  Edwin E. Salpeter,et al.  Accretion of Interstellar Matter by Massive Objects. , 1964 .

[40]  J. S. Hey,et al.  Solar Radiations in the 4–6 Metre Radio Wave-Length Band , 1946, Nature.

[41]  New insights on the QSO radio‐loud/radio‐quiet dichotomy: SDSS spectra in the context of the 4D eigenvector1 parameter space , 2008, 0804.0788.