Oblique, Stratified Winds about a Shelter Fence. Part I: Measurements

Wind statistics were measured using cup and sonic anemometers, placed upwind and downwind from a porous plastic windbreak fence (height h 5 1.25 m, length Y 5 114 m, resistance coefficient kr0 5 2.4, and porosity p 5 0.45) standing on otherwise uniform land (short grass with roughness length z 0 ; 1.9 cm). Intercomparison with collocated two-dimensional sonic anemometers suggested that, except in strongly stratified winds, cup anemometers (distance constant 1.5 m), subjected to a uniform overspeeding correction (here ;10%), provide a reasonably accurate transect of the mean wind across the disturbed flow region. The measurements, binned with respect to mean wind direction and stratification, establish that the resistance coefficient of a windbreak of this type implies the maximum (or ‘‘potential’’) mean wind reduction, a potential that is realized in neutral, perpendicular flow and for which a semiempirical formula is derived. Obliquity of the approaching wind reduces actual shelter effectiveness below the potential value, as was already known. However, a systematic influence of stratification could only be discriminated in winds that were not too far (say, within about 6308) from perpendicular, under which conditions both stable and unstable stratification reduced shelter effectiveness. The ‘‘quiet zone,’’ in which velocity standard deviations ( su, sy) are reduced relative to the approach flow, was found to extend farther downwind for the normal velocity component (u) than for the parallel component (y).

[1]  E. F. Bradley,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF VELOCITY AND SHEAR STRESS DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE WAKE OF A POROUS SHELTER FENCE , 1984 .

[2]  K. J. McAneney,et al.  Comparative shelter strategies for kiwifruit: a mechanistic interpretation of wind damage measurements , 1987 .

[3]  On shelter efficiency of shelterbelts in oblique wind , 1996 .

[4]  John D. Wilson,et al.  Numerical studies of flow through a windbreak , 1985 .

[5]  E. M. Laws,et al.  Flow Through Screens , 1978 .

[6]  Atmospheric-stability effect on windbreak shelter and drag , 1975 .

[7]  Gordon M. Heisler,et al.  2. Effects of windbreak structure on wind flow , 1988 .

[8]  A perturbation analysis of turbulent flow through a porous barrier , 1990 .

[9]  D. C. Stevenson,et al.  Wind protection by model fences in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer , 1977 .

[10]  Margitta Nord,et al.  Shelter effects of vegetation belts — Results of field measurements , 1991 .

[11]  John D. Wilson,et al.  Oblique, stratified winds about a shelter fence. Part II: Comparison of measurements with numerical models , 2004 .

[12]  Thomas K. Flesch,et al.  Wind Measurements in a Square Plot Enclosed by a Shelter Fence , 2003 .

[13]  John D. Wilson,et al.  Coherent motions in windbreak flow , 1994 .

[14]  J. Argete,et al.  The microclimate in the centre of small square sheltered plots , 1989 .

[15]  E. F. Bradley,et al.  Secondary flows in the lee of porous shelterbelts , 1977 .

[16]  John D. Wilson,et al.  A Field Study of the Mean Pressure About a Windbreak , 1997 .

[17]  John D. Wilson,et al.  On the choice of a windbreak porosity profile , 1987 .

[18]  Numerical Simulations of Shelterbelt Effects on Wind Direction , 1995 .

[19]  Eugene Yee,et al.  Calculation of winds disturbed by an array of fences , 2003 .

[20]  E. F. Bradley,et al.  An alternative analysis of flux-gradient relationships at the 1976 ITCE , 1982 .

[21]  K. G. McNaughton,et al.  1 – Effects of Windbreaks on Turbulent Transport and Microclimate , 1988 .

[22]  E. F. Bradley,et al.  Development of velocity and shear stress distribution in the wake of a porous shelter fence , 1983 .

[23]  Ido Seginer,et al.  Flow around a windbreak in oblique wind , 1975 .