Navigation with a sensory substitution device in congenitally blind individuals

Vision allows for obstacle detection and avoidance. The compensatory mechanisms involved in maintaining these functions in blind people using their remaining intact senses are poorly understood. We investigated the ability of congenitally blind participants to detect and avoid obstacles using the tongue display unit, a sensory substitution device that uses the tongue as a portal to the brain. We found that congenitally blind were better than sighted control participants in detecting and avoiding obstacles using the tongue display unit. Obstacles size and avoidance strategy had a significant effect on performance: large obstacles were better detected than small ones and step-around obstacles were better avoided than step-over ones. These data extend our earlier findings that when using a sensory substitution device, blind participants outperform sighted controls not only in a virtual navigation task but also during effective navigation within a human-sized obstacle course.

[1]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Navigating without vision: basic and applied research. , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  C. Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Representation of space in blind persons: vision as a spatial sense? , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  M. Ptito,et al.  Cross-modal plasticity revealed by electrotactile stimulation of the tongue in the congenitally blind. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  G Jansson,et al.  Tactile guidance of movement. , 1983, The International journal of neuroscience.

[5]  P. Bach-y-Rita.  Tactile Sensory Substitution Studies , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  P. Pietrini,et al.  Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[7]  R. Welsh.  Foundations of Orientation and Mobility , 1979 .

[8]  J. Rieser,et al.  Sensitivity to Perspective Structure While Walking without Vision , 1986, Perception.

[9]  L. Bouyer,et al.  Visual-vestibular influences on locomotor adjustments for stepping over an obstacle , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  M. Paré,et al.  Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects , 1998, Nature.

[11]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Distal Attribution and Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  B Hughes,et al.  Is There Anything out There?: A Study of Distal Attribution in Response to Vibrotactile Stimulation , 1986, Perception.

[13]  R. Zatorre,et al.  A Functional Neuroimaging Study of Sound Localization: Visual Cortex Activity Predicts Performance in Early-Blind Individuals , 2005, PLoS biology.

[14]  Alain Ptito,et al.  Alterations in right posterior hippocampus in early blind individuals , 2007, Neuroreport.

[15]  T. Kuyk,et al.  Environmental variables and mobility performance in adults with low vision. , 1996, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[16]  Ron Kupers,et al.  Tactile–‘visual’ acuity of the tongue in early blind individuals , 2007, Neuroreport.

[17]  K. O’regan,et al.  There is something out there: distal attribution in sensory substitution, twenty years later. , 2005, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[18]  Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al.  Neural correlates of virtual route recognition in congenital blindness , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  C. I. Howarth,et al.  The Mental Maps of the Blind: The Role of Previous Visual Experience , 1982 .

[20]  Florence Gaunet,et al.  Pointing with the left and right hands in congenitally blind children , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  Franco Lepore,et al.  Wayfinding in the blind: larger hippocampal volume and supranormal spatial navigation. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Romedi Passini,et al.  The Spatio-Cognitive Abilities of the Visually Impaired Population , 1990 .

[23]  A. Patla,et al.  Stepping over an obstacle on a compliant travel surface reveals adaptive and maladaptive changes in locomotion patterns , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  David A McVea,et al.  Object avoidance during locomotion. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.