The Correlation Ratio as a New Similarity Measure for Multimodal Image Registration

Over the last five years, new “voxel-based” approaches have allowed important progress in multimodal image registration, notably due to the increasing use of information-theoretic similarity measures. Their wide success has led to the progressive abandon of measures using standard image statistics (mean and variance). Until now, such measures have essentially been based on heuristics. In this paper, we address the determination of a new measure based on standard statistics from a theoretical point of view. We show that it naturally leads to a known concept of probability theory, the correlation ratio. In our derivation, we take as the hypothesis the functional dependence between the image intensities. Although such a hypothesis is not as general as possible, it enables us to model the image smoothness prior very easily. We also demonstrate results of multimodal rigid registration involving Magnetic Resonance (MR), Computed Tomography (CT), and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images. These results suggest that the correlation ratio provides a good trade-off between accuracy and robustness.

[1]  Fabrice Heitz,et al.  Single- and multimodal subvoxel registration of dissimilar medical images using robust similarity measures , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[2]  G. Marchal,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997 .

[3]  Morten Bro-Nielsen Rigid registration of CT, MR and cryosection images using a GLCM framework , 1997, CVRMed.

[4]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Rapid Automated Algorithm for Aligning and Reslicing PET Images , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  N. Ayache,et al.  Multimodal Image Registration by Maximization of the Correlation Ratio , 1998 .

[7]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[8]  Colin Studholme,et al.  Automated 3-D registration of MR and CT images of the head , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin-plate spline warped geometric deformations , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  Paul F. Hemler,et al.  Grey value correlation techniques used for automatic matching of CT and MR brain and spine images , 1994, Other Conferences.

[14]  Gilbert Saporta,et al.  Probabilités, Analyse des données et statistique , 1991 .

[15]  Lisa M. Brown,et al.  A survey of image registration techniques , 1992, CSUR.

[16]  Richard E. Blahut,et al.  Principles and practice of information theory , 1987 .

[17]  M. Viergever,et al.  Medical image matching-a review with classification , 1993, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[18]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Medical Image Registration using Voxel Similarity Measures , 1994 .

[19]  Grégoire Malandain,et al.  Improving Registration of 3-D Medical Images Using a Mechanical Based Method , 1994, ECCV.