MR angiography with gadofosveset trisodium for peripheral vascular disease: phase II trial.

PURPOSE To evaluate the dose response and safety of gadofosveset trisodium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography compared with nonenhanced two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and with x-ray angiography as the standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this randomized, 20-center, double-blind study, 238 men and women who had peripheral vascular disease or were suspected of having it received intravenous injection of placebo or gadofosveset (0.005, 0.01, 0.03, 0.05, or 0.07 mmol per kilogram of body weight). MR angiographic images were evaluated by three blinded readers, and x-ray angiographic images were evaluated by two readers. Hypothesis testing for the presence of a dose response was based on a linear test for trend for increase in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve as a function of dose for each reader of MR angiographic images independently. RESULTS Gadofosveset administration resulted in a dose-dependent increase in diagnostic accuracy for detection of aortoiliac occlusive disease as reflected in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for each reader (P <.001). The plateau in effectiveness improvement began at the 0.03 mmol/kg dose. At doses of 0.03 mmol/kg and higher, gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography provided an approximate 20% increase in accuracy over nonenhanced MR angiography for diagnosis of clinically significant aortoiliac occlusive disease. Gadofosveset exhibited a good safety profile in all dose groups. Three serious adverse events were possibly or probably related to gadofosveset administration. There were no dose-related trends in severe or serious adverse events in patients receiving gadofosveset. CONCLUSION A dose of 0.03 mmol/kg of gadofosveset was safe and effective for evaluation of aortoiliac occlusive disease with MR angiography.

[1]  Horst Urbach,et al.  Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. , 2002, Radiology.

[2]  T. Grist,et al.  Comparison of intraarterial and IV gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with digital subtraction angiography for the detection of renal artery stenosis in pigs. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  F. Korosec,et al.  Aorta and runoff vessels: single-injection MR angiography with automated table movement compared with multiinjection time-resolved MR angiography--initial results. , 2001, Radiology.

[4]  M. Criqui,et al.  Peripheral Arterial Disease Detection, Awareness, and Treatment in Primary Care , 2001 .

[5]  D. Peters,et al.  3D MR DSA: Effects of injection protocol and image masking , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  N. Rofsky,et al.  MR angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. , 2000, Radiology.

[7]  T. Grist MRA of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  D C Peters,et al.  Steady-state and dynamic MR angiography with MS-325: initial experience in humans. , 1998, Radiology.

[9]  R. Dolan,et al.  MS-325: albumin-targeted contrast agent for MR angiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[10]  J Szumowski,et al.  Aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: evaluation with MR angiography versus conventional angiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[11]  E. Yucel,et al.  Iliac artery stenosis measurements: comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  R Frayne,et al.  MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography. , 1996, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[13]  Leon Axel,et al.  Multicenter Trial to Evaluate Vascular Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Lower Extremity , 1995 .

[14]  T M Grist,et al.  Multicenter trial to evaluate vascular magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. American College of Radiology Rapid Technology Assessment Group. , 1995, JAMA.

[15]  S. Trerotola,et al.  Interpretations and treatment decisions based on MR angiography versus conventional arteriography in symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. , 1995, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[16]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity: prospective evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. , 1993, Radiology.

[17]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.