An Exploratory Study of User Perceptions of Payment Methods in UK and the US

This paper presents the design and the results of a cross-cultural study of user perceptions and attitudes toward electronic payment methods. We conduct a series of semi-structured interviews involving forty participants (20 in London, UK, and 20 in Manhattan, KS, USA) to explore how individuals use the mechanisms available to them within their routine payment and banking activities. We also study their comprehension of payment processes, the perceived effort and impact of using different methods, as well as direct or indirect recollections of (suspected or actual) fraud and related interactions with banks and retailers. By comparing UK and US participants, we also elicit commonalities and differences that may help better understand, if not predict, attitudes of US customers once technologies like Chip-and-PIN are rolled out – for instance, several US participants were confused by how to use it, while UK participants found it convenient. Our results show that purchasing habits as well as the availability of rewards schemes are primary criteria influencing choices relating to payment technologies, and that inconsistencies, glitches, and other difficulties with newer technologies generate frustration sometimes leading to complete avoidance of new payment methods.

[1]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[2]  S. Forsythe,et al.  Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping , 2003 .

[3]  Simson L. Garfinkel,et al.  RFID privacy: an overview of problems and proposed solutions , 2005, IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine.

[4]  Gianluca Stringhini,et al.  Are payment card contracts unfair , 2015, FC 2016.

[5]  Emiliano De Cristofaro,et al.  "They brought in the horrible key ring thing!" Analysing the Usability of Two-Factor Authentication in UK Online Banking , 2015, ArXiv.

[6]  Mike Bond,et al.  2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy Chip and PIN is Broken , 2022 .

[7]  Rick Wash,et al.  Organization Interfaces—collaborative computing General Terms , 2022 .

[8]  Mike Bond,et al.  Phish and Chips Traditional and New Recipes for Attacking EMV , 2006 .

[9]  Mike Just,et al.  On the security and usability of dual credential authentication in UK online banking , 2012, 2012 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions.

[10]  Steven J. Murdoch,et al.  EMV: why payment systems fail , 2014, CACM.

[11]  Steven J. Murdoch,et al.  Thinking Inside the Box: System-Level Failures of Tamper Proofing , 2008, 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (sp 2008).

[12]  Emiliano De Cristofaro,et al.  Two-Factor or not Two-Factor? A Comparative Usability Study of Two-Factor Authentication , 2013, ArXiv.

[13]  H. Lacohée,et al.  Trustguide — trust in ICT , 2006 .

[14]  Wang Tao,et al.  An empirical study of customers' perceptions of security and trust in e-payment systems , 2010, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[15]  Mike Bond,et al.  Chip and spin , 2006 .

[16]  Fumiko Hayashi Do U.S. Consumers Really Benefit from Payment Card Rewards , 2009 .

[17]  A. Kosse The Safety of Cash and Debit Cards: A Study on the Perception and Behaviour of Dutch Consumers , 2010 .

[18]  Celeste Lyn Paul,et al.  A Field Study of User Behavior and Perceptions in Smartcard Authentication , 2011, INTERACT.

[19]  Ross J. Anderson,et al.  A Birthday Present Every Eleven Wallets? The Security of Customer-Chosen Banking PINs , 2012, Financial Cryptography.