Epicentre accuracy based on seismic network criteria

SUMMARY We establish reliable and conservative estimates for epicentre location accuracy using data that are readily available in published seismic bulletins. A large variety of seismic studies rely on catalogues of event locations, making proper assessment of location uncertainty critical. Event location and uncertainty parameters in most global, regional and national earthquake catalogues are obtained from traditional linearized inversion methods using a 1-D Earth model to predict traveltimes. Reported catalogue uncertainties are based on the assumption that error processes are Gaussian, zero mean and uncorrelated. Unfortunately, these assumptions are commonly violated, leading to the underestimation of true location uncertainty, especially at high confidence levels. We find that catalogue location accuracy is most reliably estimated by station geometry. We make use of two explosions with exactly known epicentres to develop local network location (0 ◦ ‐2.5 ◦ ) accuracy criteria. Using Monte Carlo simulations of network geometry, we find that local network locations are accurate to within 5 km with a 95 per cent confidence level when the network meets the following criteria: (1) there are 10 or more stations, all within 250 km, (2) an azimuthal gap of less than 110 ◦ , (3) a secondary azimuthal gap of less than 160 ◦ and (4) at least one station within 30 km. To derive location accuracy criteria for near-regional (2.5 ◦ ‐10 ◦ ), regional (2.5 ◦ ‐20 ◦ ) and teleseismic (28 ◦ ‐91 ◦ ) networks, we use a large data set of exceptionally well-located earthquakes and nuclear explosions. Beyond local distances, we find that the secondary azimuthal gap is sufficient to constrain epicentre accuracy, and location error increases when the secondary azimuthal gap exceeds 120 ◦ . When station coverage meets the criterion of a secondary azimuth gap of less than 120 ◦ , near-regional networks provide 20 km accuracy at the 90 per cent confidence level, while regional and teleseismic networks provide 25 km accuracy at the 90 per cent confidence level.

[1]  Xiaoping Yang,et al.  84 Worldwide nuclear explosions , 2003 .

[2]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Ability of a global three‐dimensional model to locate regional events , 2003 .

[3]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Validation and Generation of Reference Events by Cluster Analysis , 2001 .

[4]  A. Shapira,et al.  Dead Sea Seismic Calibration Experiment Contributes to CTBT Monitoring , 2001 .

[5]  Xiaoping Yang,et al.  Location Calibration Data for CTBT Monitoring at the Prototype International Data Center , 2001 .

[6]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  Global Event Location with Full and Sparse Data Sets Using Three-dimensional Models of Mantle P-wave Velocity , 2001 .

[7]  A. Velasco,et al.  Improving Regional Seismic Event Location in China , 2001 .

[8]  B. Kennett,et al.  Seismic Event Location: Nonlinear Inversion Using a Neighbourhood Algorithm , 2001 .

[9]  F. Waldhauser,et al.  A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm: Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California , 2000 .

[10]  Craig A. Schultz,et al.  Improving Sparse Network Seismic Location with Bayesian Kriging and Teleseismically Constrained Calibration Events , 2000 .

[11]  Christopher F. Powell,et al.  Monitoring Nuclear Tests , 1998, Science.

[12]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[13]  L. Rivera,et al.  Seismic source study of the Racha-Dzhava (Georgia) earthquake from aftershocks and broad-band teleseismic body-wave records: an example of active nappe tectonics , 1997 .

[14]  J. J. Sweeney,et al.  Accuracy of teleseismic event locations in the Middle East and North Africa , 1996 .

[15]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes , 1995 .

[16]  B. Kennett,et al.  Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification , 1991 .

[17]  Ray Buland,et al.  Uniform reduction error analysis , 1986 .

[18]  Gary L. Pavlis,et al.  Progressive multiple event location (PMEL) , 1983 .

[19]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Teleseismic location techniques and their application to earthquake clusters in the South-Central Pacific , 1981 .

[20]  Jack F. Evernden,et al.  Precision of epicenters obtained by small numbers of world-wide stations , 1969 .

[21]  E. Herrin,et al.  Source bias in epicenter determinations , 1968 .

[22]  Eugene Herrin,et al.  Introduction to “1968 seismological tables for P phases” , 1968 .

[23]  A. DOUGLAS,et al.  Joint Epicentre Determination , 1967, Nature.

[24]  E. A. Flinn,et al.  Confidence regions and error determinations for seismic event location , 1965 .

[25]  E. Engdahl,et al.  A NEW GRID-SEARCH MULTIPLE-EVENT LOCATION ALGORITHM AND A COMPARISON OF METHODS , 2002 .

[26]  A. Shapira,et al.  SEISMIC LOCATION CALIBRATION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN , NORTH AFRICA , MIDDLE EAST AND WESTER EURASIA , 2002 .

[27]  A. Shapira,et al.  SEISMIC LOCATION CALIBRATION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN , NORTH AFRICA , MIDDLE EAST , AND WESTERN , 2001 .

[28]  Robert Avag.  New Details Emerge About Pakistan's First Nuclear Test Site | Institute for Science and International Security , 1998 .