Evidence for Preserved Representations in Change Blindness

People often fail to detect large changes to scenes, provided that the changes occur during a visual disruption. This phenomenon, known as "change blindness," occurs both in the laboratory and in real-world situations in which changes occur unexpectedly. The pervasiveness of the inability to detect changes is consistent with the theoretical notion that we internally represent relatively little information from our visual world from one glance at a scene to the next. However, evidence for change blindness does not necessarily imply the absence of such a representation---people could also miss changes if they fail to compare an existing representation of the pre-change scene to the post-change scene. In three experiments, we show that people often do have a representation of some aspects of the pre-change scene even when they fail to report the change. And, in fact, they appear to "discover" this memory and can explicitly report details of a changed object in response to probing questions. The results of these real-world change detection studies are discussed in the context of broader claims about change blindness.

[1]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  H. Quastler Information theory in psychology : problems and methods , 1955 .

[3]  D. Simons In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail , 1996 .

[4]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Attention : selection, awareness, and control : a tribute to Donald Broadbent , 1996 .

[5]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Memory for Real-World Scenes: The Role of Consistency With Schema Expectation , 1989 .

[6]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[7]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  David E. Irwin Information integration across saccadic eye movements , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  W. Brewer,et al.  Role of schemata in memory for places , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Bonnie L. Angelone,et al.  Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental real-world change detection paradigm. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[12]  J. Schooler Discovering Memories of Abuse in the Light of Meta-Awareness , 2001 .

[13]  I. Biederman,et al.  Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  Vision and Attention , 2001 .

[15]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays , 1986 .

[16]  I. Thornton,et al.  Change Detection Without Awareness: Do Explicit Reports Underestimate the Representation of Change in the Visual System? , 2000 .

[17]  J. Henderson,et al.  Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Stephen R. Mitroff,et al.  Changes are not localized before they are explicitly detected , 2002 .

[19]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Attention: Selection, Awareness, and Control , 1993 .

[20]  J. M. Stroud THE FINE STRUCTURE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TIME , 1967 .

[21]  I. Thornton,et al.  An implicit measure of undetected change. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[22]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction , 1998 .

[23]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures , 1997 .

[24]  Stephen R. Mitroff,et al.  The Role of Expectations in Change Detection and Attentional Capture , 2001 .

[25]  W. A. Phillips On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[26]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[27]  Ronald A. Rensink Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing , 2000, Vision Research.

[28]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  C. Trevarthen Review: Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology , 1977 .

[30]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  J. Grimes On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. , 1996 .

[32]  J. Enns,et al.  What’s new in visual masking? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Picture Changes During Blinks: Looking Without Seeing and Seeing Without Looking , 2000 .

[34]  Veronika Coltheart,et al.  Detection and Identification of Change in Naturalistic Scenes , 2000 .

[35]  J. Henderson,et al.  The Role of Fixation Position in Detecting Scene Changes Across Saccades , 1999 .

[36]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Current Approaches to Change Blindness , 2000 .

[37]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  On the Failure to Detect Changes in Scenes Across Brief Interruptions , 2000 .

[38]  A. Treisman Visual Attention and the Perception of Features and Objects , 1994 .

[39]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[40]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Does unattended information facilitate change detection? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Christopher B. Currie,et al.  Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’ , 1999, Nature.

[43]  A. Friedman Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  Ronald A. Rensink Visual Search for Change: A Probe into the Nature of Attentional Processing , 2000 .

[45]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[46]  D. Simons Attentional capture and inattentional blindness , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.