Medicaid, Medicare, and the Michigan Tumor Registry: A Linkage Strategy

The study of health outcomes and the reduction in health disparities is at the forefront of the nation's health care agenda. A theme in the disparities literature is the call for a data infrastructure that can track progress toward goals aimed at reducing differences in health outcomes. This article describes a strategy for linking Medicaid, Medicare, and Michigan Tumor Registry data for the purposes of studying disparities in cancer diagnosis, quality of care, and survival. The authors review their procedures for ensuring that a correct match between files occurred and offer guidance for merging and assessing the quality of these complex linked data sets. A cohort of 113,604 subjects (90%) from a population of 125,900 subjects was correctly linked from the Michigan Tumor Registry to Medicare and Medicaid files. Using probabilistic and deterministic methods, the prediction rate of the Medicaid match to the Michigan Tumor Registry was 93%. Approximately 13% of the subjects were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. An expansive data set reflecting the Medicare and Medicaid medical service utilization and outcomes for a cohort of individuals age 65 years and older when diagnosed with cancer was created. This data set serves as a cornerstone of a health outcomes data infrastructure. The methodology described may serve as a model for other researchers seeking to create a similar data set in their state.

[1]  R. Kahn,et al.  Managing People at High Risk for Diabetes , 2006 .

[2]  John D. Roberts,et al.  Criterion validity of Medicare chemotherapy claims in Cancer and Leukemia Group B breast and lung cancer trial participants. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  J. Frytak,et al.  Medical costs after initiation of drug treatment for overactive bladder: effects of selection bias on cost estimates. , 2005, The American journal of managed care.

[4]  D. McClish,et al.  The Added Value of Claims for Cancer Surveillance: Results of Varying Case Definitions , 2005, Medical care.

[5]  L. Kazis,et al.  Do Poor Health Behaviors Affect Health‐related Quality of Life and Healthcare Utilization Among Veterans?: The Veterans Health Study , 2005, The Journal of ambulatory care management.

[6]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  Utilization of Medical Services by Veterans Health Study (VHS) Respondents , 2005, The journal of ambulatory care management.

[7]  Therese A. Stukel,et al.  Long-term Outcomes of Regional Variations in Intensity of Invasive vs Medical Management of Medicare Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2005 .

[8]  W. Ghali,et al.  Cross-provincial use of cardiac services: the importance of data-sharing for clinical registries and outcomes research. , 2005, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[9]  J. Holmes,et al.  Measurement Challenges in Developing the National Healthcare Quality Report and the National Healthcare Disparities Report , 2005, Medical care.

[10]  D. Mechanic Policy challenges in addressing racial disparities and improving population health. , 2005, Health affairs.

[11]  N. Lurie,et al.  Disparities and quality improvement: federal policy levers. , 2005, Health affairs.

[12]  Marion Standish,et al.  Communities and health policy: a pathway for change. , 2005, Health affairs.

[13]  J. Holmes,et al.  Preparing the National Healthcare Disparities Report: Gaps in Data for Assessing Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Health Care , 2005, Medical care.

[14]  Ichiro Kawachi,et al.  Health disparities by race and class: why both matter. , 2005, Health affairs.

[15]  G. Cooper,et al.  Receipt of colorectal testing prior to colorectal carcinoma diagnosis , 2005, Cancer.

[16]  Adrienne Y. Stith,et al.  Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care , 2005 .

[17]  C. Bradley,et al.  Health care disparities and cervical cancer. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[18]  P. Doraiswamy,et al.  Marked Increase in Alzheimer's Disease Identified in Medicare Claims Records Between 1991 and 1999 , 2004 .

[19]  M. Mcclellan,et al.  Trends in inpatient treatment intensity among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life. , 2004, Health services research.

[20]  Lisa I. Iezzoni,et al.  Capturing and Classifying Functional Status Information in Administrative Databases , 2003, Health care financing review.

[21]  G. Cooper,et al.  Use of SEER-Medicare Data for Measuring Cancer Surgery , 2002, Medical care.

[22]  Gregory S. Cooper,et al.  Studying Radiation Therapy Using SEER-Medicare-Linked Data , 2002, Medical care.

[23]  Beth A Virnig,et al.  Utility of the SEER-Medicare Data to Identify Chemotherapy Use , 2002, Medical care.

[24]  C. Snyder,et al.  The Outcomes of Cancer Outcomes Research: Focusing on the National Cancer Institute’s Quality-of-Care Initiative , 2002, Medical care.

[25]  R D Etzioni,et al.  Obtaining long-term disease specific costs of care: application to Medicare enrollees diagnosed with colorectal cancer. , 1999, Medical care.

[26]  B. Smedley,et al.  The unequal burden of cancer : an assessment of NIH research and programs for ethnic minorities and the medically underserved , 1999 .

[27]  Matthew A. Jaro,et al.  Probabilistic linkage of large public health data files. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  A G Muse,et al.  Evaluating the quality of anonymous record linkage using deterministic procedures with the New York State AIDS registry and a hospital discharge file. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  L. Kessler,et al.  Potential for Cancer Related Health Services Research Using a Linked Medicare‐Tumor Registry Database , 1993, Medical care.