Connectivity of core habitat in the Northeastern United States: Parks and protected areas in a landscape context

article i nfo The exurbanization process, particularly rural residential development, is reducing the amount of roadless areas and remote habitat across the nation, with implications for biodiversity and ecosystem integrity of parks and protected areas. The need for connecting protected areas via existing habitat centers, or relatively undisturbed core areas, is greater than ever as exurbanization expands. Our objective was to make use of nationally available data sets on roads as well as information derived from satellite imagery, including impervious cover of the built environment and forest canopy density, to identify core habitat of the northeastern and mid-Atlantic USA. The identified core habitat areas, which covered 73,730 km 2 across 1177 discrete units, were stratified in terms of land ownership and management, and then analyzed in a landscape context using connectivity metrics derived from graph theory. The connectivity analysis made use of a suitability surface, derived from the land cover information, which approximated the costs incurred by hypothetical animals traversing the landscape. We show that protected areas are frequently identified as core habitat but are typically isolated, albeit sometimes buffered by adjacent multi-use lands (such as state or national forests). Over one third of the core habitat we identified has no protection, and another 42% is subject to motorized recreation or timber extraction. We provide maps showing the relative importance of core habitat areas for potentially connecting existing protected areas, and also provide an example of the vulnerability of connectivity to projected future residential development around one greater park ecosystem.

[1]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  Can Smart Growth Save the Chesapeake Bay , 2007 .

[2]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[3]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics , 2004 .

[4]  M. C. Hansena,et al.  Development of a MODIS tree cover validation data set for Western Province , Zambia , 2002 .

[5]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  Using Widely Available Geospatial Data Sets to Assess the Influence of Roads and Buffers on Habitat Core Areas and Connectivity , 2008 .

[6]  R. Forman,et al.  ROADS AND THEIR MAJOR ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS , 1998 .

[7]  M. Nowak,et al.  Habitat destruction and the extinction debt , 1994, Nature.

[8]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Land‐Use Dynamics Beyond the American Urban Fringe* , 2001 .

[9]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Effect of road traffic on amphibian density , 1995 .

[10]  Jon R. Martin,et al.  ASSESSING THE EXTENT TO WHICH ROADLESS AREAS COMPLEMENT THE CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 2001 .

[11]  R. Nemani,et al.  Global Distribution and Density of Constructed Impervious Surfaces , 2007, Sensors.

[12]  Andrew J. Hansen,et al.  EFFECTS OF EXURBAN DEVELOPMENT ON BIODIVERSITY: PATTERNS, MECHANISMS, AND RESEARCH NEEDS , 2005 .

[13]  W. F. Porter,et al.  Effects of land use management on biotic integrity: An investigation of bird communities , 2005 .

[14]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  REMOTE SENSING OF RIPARIAN BUFFERS: PAST PROGRESS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS 1 , 2006 .

[15]  Limin Yang,et al.  COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCES , 2001 .

[16]  H. Mader,et al.  Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields , 1984 .

[17]  C. Loucks,et al.  USDA Forest Service Roadless Areas: Potential Biodiversity Conservation Reserves , 2003 .

[18]  R. G. Wright,et al.  GAP ANALYSIS: A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PROTECTION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1993 .

[19]  Kenneth M. Johnson,et al.  Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950-2000 , 2005 .

[20]  R D Holt,et al.  Diverse and Contrasting Effects of Habitat Fragmentation , 1992, Science.

[21]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global Percent Tree Cover at a Spatial Resolution of 500 Meters: First Results of the MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields Algorithm , 2003 .

[22]  Kristina D. Rothley,et al.  Working backwards to move forwards: Graph-based connectivity metrics for reserve network selection , 2005 .

[23]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  Linking the diversity and abundance of stream biota to landscapes in the mid-Atlantic USA , 2008 .

[24]  James P. Gibbs,et al.  Estimating the Effects of Road Mortality on Turtle Populations , 2002 .

[25]  S. Goetz,et al.  Satellite maps show Chesapeake Bay urban development , 2006 .

[26]  Susan I. Stewart,et al.  The wildland-urban interface in the United States based on 125 million building locations. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[27]  R. DeFries,et al.  Land Use Change around Nature Reserves: Implications for Sustaining Biodiversity1 , 2007 .

[28]  Carlos Carroll,et al.  Extinction Debt of Protected Areas in Developing Landscapes , 2004 .

[29]  Kurt H. Riitters,et al.  Monitoring environmental quality at the landscape scale , 1997 .

[30]  D. Dellasala,et al.  Importance of Roadless Areas in Biodiversity Conservation in Forested Ecosystems: Case Study of the Klamath‐Siskiyou Ecoregion of the United States , 2001 .

[31]  C. Loehle,et al.  Simulating the cumulative effects of multiple forest management strategies on landscape measures of forest sustainability , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[32]  Cristina Milesi,et al.  U.S. constructed area approaches the size of Ohio , 2004 .

[33]  F. Woodward,et al.  Conservation of Biodiversity in a Changing Climate , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[34]  Scott Goetz,et al.  Urbanization and the Loss of Resource Lands in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed , 2005, Environmental management.

[35]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory , 2000 .

[36]  L. Irland,et al.  Changing Timberland Ownership in the Northern Forest and Implications for Biodiversity , 2005 .

[37]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  MODELING ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES ACROSS SCALES , 2005 .