A comparison between hybrid methods: FEM-BEM versus FEM-DBCI

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to compare the hybrid FEM-BEM and FEM-DBCI methods for the solution of open-boundary static and quasi-static electromagnetic field problems. Design/methodology/approach – After a brief review of the two methods (both coupling a differential equation for the interior problem with an integral equation for the exterior one), they are compared in terms of accuracy, memory and computing time requirements by means of a set of simple examples. Findings – The comparison suggests that FEM-BEM is more accurate than FEM-DBCI but requires more computing time. Practical implications – Then FEM-DBCI appears more appropriate for applications which require a shorter computing time, for example in the stochastic optimization of electromagnetic devices. Conversely, FEM-BEM is more appropriate in cases in which a high level of precision is required in a single computation. Originality/value – Note that the FEM-BEM considered in this paper is a non standard one in which the nodes of the...

[1]  Y. Saad,et al.  GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems , 1986 .

[2]  Peter P. Silvester,et al.  Finite Elements for Electrical Engineers , 1983 .

[3]  E. Dilettoso,et al.  Finite-element solution of eddy-current problems in unbounded domains by means of the hybrid FEM-DBCI method , 2003 .

[4]  Giovanni Aiello,et al.  A Generalized Minimal Residual Acceleration of the Charge Iteration Procedure , 1997 .

[5]  S. Kurz,et al.  An improved algorithm for the BEM-FEM-coupling method using domain decomposition , 1995 .

[6]  S. Alfonzetti,et al.  A Non-Standard Family of Boundary Elements for the Hybrid FEM-BEM Method , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[7]  Salvatore Coco,et al.  Finite element iterative solution of skin effect problems in open boundaries , 1996 .

[8]  E. Dilettoso,et al.  An Iterative Solution to FEM-BEM Algebraic Systems for Open-Boundary Electrostatic Problems , 2006, 2006 12th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation.

[9]  G. Borzi,et al.  An Overview Of The ELFIN Code For FiniteElement Research In Electrical Engineering , 1999 .

[10]  J. D'Angelo,et al.  Applications of the hybrid finite element-boundary element method in electromagnetics , 1988 .

[11]  Giovanni Aiello,et al.  An improved solution scheme for open-boundary skin effect problems , 2001 .

[12]  E. M. Freeman,et al.  A sparse matrix open boundary method for finite element analysis , 1989 .

[13]  Giovanni Aiello,et al.  Improved Selection of the Integration Surface in the Hybrid FEM-DBCI Method , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[14]  Nikolai A. Simonov,et al.  The random walk on the boundary method for calculating capacitance , 2004 .

[15]  Salvatore Coco,et al.  Charge iteration: A procedure for the finite element computation of unbounded electrical fields , 1994 .

[16]  Boundary element technique : C.A. Brebbia, J.C.F. Tellas and L.C. Wrobel Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984, 464 pp., US $70.20; DM 188 , 1984 .