Collaboration without consensus: Building resilience in sustainable agriculture through ICTs

Abstract In this article, we draw on a case study of a weather information system in West Bengal, India to examine how the design and usage of ICTs can play a much larger role in steering holistic changes in everyday practices of smallholder farmers as they cope with effects of climate change. In doing so, we focus on the role of the information system in forging collaborative practices across diverse set of actors with varied interests. We show how collaborative practices facilitate village capacity building to make effective use of outside expertise, convert them into locally relevant knowledge, and imbue them with new meaning in their everyday practices. We argue that these capacities are a necessary means by which smallholder farmers can build resilience in the face of the global climate crisis.

[1]  R. Evenson,et al.  Assessing the Impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000 , 2003, Science.

[2]  Miguel A. Altieri,et al.  Agroecology: the science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments , 2002 .

[3]  Steve Howard,et al.  Methods & tools: the rich picture: a tool for reasoning about work context , 1998, INTR.

[4]  Tania M. Li,et al.  The Will To Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics Tania Murray Li , 2008 .

[5]  Glyn Williams.  Evaluating participatory development: tyranny, power and (re)politicisation , 2004 .

[6]  Matthew L. Smith,et al.  Being Open in ICT4D , 2014 .

[7]  Jenny C. Aker,et al.  Dial 'A' for Agriculture: A Review of Information and Communication Technologies for Agricultural Extension in Developing Countries , 2011 .

[8]  Jenna Burrell,et al.  The myth of market price information: mobile phones and the application of economic knowledge in ICTD , 2015, Digital Economies at Global Margins.

[9]  Satish K. Puri,et al.  Integrating Scientific with Indigenous Knowledge: Constructing Knowledge Alliances for Land Management in India , 2007, MIS Q..

[10]  Elisa Oreglia,et al.  When technology doesn't fit: information sharing practices among farmers in rural China , 2013, ICTD.

[11]  Jules Pretty,et al.  Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture , 1995 .

[12]  C. Gomes.  Computational Sustainability: Computational methods for a sustainable environment, economy, and society , 2009 .

[13]  Linus Kendall,et al.  Disentangling participatory ICT design in socioeconomic development , 2018, PDC.

[14]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[15]  D. Mosse,et al.  Is Good Policy Unimplementable? Reflections on the Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice , 2004 .

[16]  Simone Cecchini,et al.  Warana: The Case of an Indian Rural Community Adopting ICT , 2002 .

[17]  Lars Rune Christensen,et al.  Krishi Kontho: an agricultural information service in Bangladesh , 2018, NordiCHI.

[18]  Bidisha Chaudhuri,et al.  Understanding capabilities through everyday practice: The case of a weather information system for farmers in West Bengal , 2017, ICTD.

[19]  Jean Lave,et al.  Situating learning in communities of practice , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[20]  Andrew M. Dearden,et al.  Kheti: mobile multimedia in an agricultural co-operative , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[21]  Mamunur Rashid,et al.  Are you magicians?: the collaborative work of an agricultural information service , 2019, ICTD.

[22]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[23]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Social Learning and Water Resources Management , 2007 .

[24]  Bill Tomlinson,et al.  Computational Agroecology: Sustainable Food Ecosystem Design , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[25]  H. Kimaro,et al.  HIS Standardization in Developing Countries: Use of Boundary Objects to Enable Multiple Translations , 2015 .

[26]  Prabhu L Pingali,et al.  Green Revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Jock R. Anderson,et al.  Agricultural Extension: Good Intentions and Hard Realities , 2004 .

[28]  R. Chambers,et al.  Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century , 1992 .

[29]  Tapan S. Parikh,et al.  Avaaj Otalo: a field study of an interactive voice forum for small farmers in rural India , 2010, CHI.

[30]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[31]  Govindan Parayil,et al.  The Green Revolution in India: A Case Study of Technological Change , 1992, Technology and Culture.

[32]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Conceptualising the link between information systems and resilience: A developing country field study , 2019, Inf. Syst. J..

[33]  Janaki Srinivasan,et al.  On the Importance of Price Information to Fishers and to Economists: Revisiting Mobile Phone Use Among Fishers in Kerala , 2015 .

[34]  Sidney Cox,et al.  Information technology: the global key to precision agriculture and sustainability , 2002 .

[35]  Jacki O'Neill,et al.  KrishiPustak: A Social Networking System for Low-Literate Farmers , 2015, CSCW.

[36]  Bidisha Chaudhuri,et al.  The Ins and Outs of Participation in a Weather Information System , 2019, ICT4D.

[37]  Charles Steinfield,et al.  Why Don't Farmers Use Cell Phones to Access Market Prices? Technology Affordances and Barriers to Market Information Services Adoption in Rural Kenya , 2016, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[38]  R. J. Salvador,et al.  Agroecology: The Ecology of Food Systems , 2003 .

[39]  F. Berkes.  Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning , 2017 .

[40]  Susan Leigh Star.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[41]  B. Cooke,et al.  Participation: the New Tyranny? , 2001 .

[42]  S. Kark,et al.  Cross-boundary collaboration: key to the conservation puzzle , 2015 .

[43]  Rupak Goswami,et al.  Accessing Agricultural Information through Mobile Phone: Lessons of IKSL Services in West Bengal , 2016 .

[44]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[45]  Andrea Cornwall.  Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development. , 2003 .

[46]  C. Termeer,et al.  ICT-enabled boundary spanning arrangements in collaborative sustainability governance , 2016 .

[47]  Daniel H. Cole,et al.  Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy , 2015 .

[48]  A. Escobar.  Encountering Development : The Making and Unmaking of the Third World , 1994 .

[49]  Bart Minten,et al.  Impact of SMS-Based Agricultural Information on Indian Farmers , 2012 .

[50]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  How do development actors do “ICT for development”? A strategy‐as‐practice perspective on emerging practices in Ghanaian agriculture , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[51]  Anthony Willett,et al.  Agricultural Extension: Generic Challenges and Some Ingredients for Solutions , 1999 .

[52]  Rajesh Veeraraghavan,et al.  Digital Green: Participatory video for agricultural extension , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development.

[53]  Shawn Cole,et al.  ‘Mobile’izing Agricultural Advice: Technology Adoption, Diffusion, and Sustainability , 2020, The Economic Journal.

[54]  Jenny C. Aker,et al.  Can mobile phones improve agricultural outcomes? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Niger , 2016 .