Evaluation of stirring time through a rumen simulation technique: Influences on rumen fermentation and bacterial community

Introduction Rumen motility is a key element that influences ruminant nutrition, whereas little is known about the effects of rumen contraction duration on rumen fermentation and ruminal microbiome. We previously reported that proper rotation speed of a rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) system enhanced rumen fermentation and microbial protein (MCP) production. In the present study, different contraction durations and intervals were simulated by setting different stirring times and intervals of the stirrers in a RUSITEC system. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the influences of stirring time on rumen fermentation characteristics, nutrient degradation, and ruminal bacterial microbiota in vitro. Methods This experiment was performed in a 3 × 3 Latin square design, with each experimental period comprising 4 d for adjustment and 3 d for sample collection. Three stirring time treatments were set: the constant stir (CS), the intermittent stir 1 (each stir for 5 min with an interval of 2 min, IS1), and the intermittent stir 2 (each stir for 4 min with an interval of 3 min, IS2). Results The total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) concentration, valerate molar proportion, ammonia nitrogen level, MCP density, protozoa count, disappearance rates of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber, emissions of total gas and methane, and the richness index Chao 1 for the bacterial community were higher (p < 0.05) in the IS1 when compared to those in the CS. The greatest TVFA, MCP, protozoa count, nutrient disappearance rates, gas productions, and bacterial richness indices of Ace and Chao 1 amongst all treatments were observed in the IS2. The relative abundance of the genus Treponema was enriched (p < 0.05) in CS, while the enrichment (p < 0.05) of Agathobacter ruminis and another two less known bacterial genera were identified in IS2. Discussion It could be concluded that the proper reduction in the stirring time might help to enhance the feed fermentation, MCP synthesis, gas production, and the relative abundances of specific bacterial taxa.

[1]  Z. Tan,et al.  Tannic acid reduced apparent protein digestibility and induced oxidative stress and inflammatory response without altering growth performance and ruminal microbiota diversity of Xiangdong black goats , 2022, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[2]  K. Südekum,et al.  Opportunities and limitations of a standardisation of the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) for analyses of ruminal nutrient degradation and fermentation and on microbial community characteristics , 2022, Animal Feed Science and Technology.

[3]  Min Wang,et al.  Proper motility enhances rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis with decreased saturation of dissolved gases in rumen simulation technique. , 2021, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  Huiru Zheng,et al.  Selenium Yeast Dietary Supplement Affects Rumen Bacterial Population Dynamics and Fermentation Parameters of Tibetan Sheep (Ovis aries) in Alpine Meadow , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[5]  A. Cieślak,et al.  Rumen Ciliated Protozoa of the Free-Living European Bison (Bison bonasus, Linnaeus) , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[6]  J. V. Van Hamme,et al.  Correlation of Breed, Growth Performance, and Rumen Microbiota in Two Rustic Cattle Breeds Reared Under Different Conditions , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[7]  Z. Tan,et al.  Fermented Soybean Meal Replacement in the Diet of Lactating Holstein Dairy Cows: Modulated Rumen Fermentation and Ruminal Microflora , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[8]  J. Zhang,et al.  Effects of riboflavin supplementation on performance, nutrient digestion, rumen microbiota composition and activities of Holstein bulls , 2021, British Journal of Nutrition.

[9]  Z. Tan,et al.  Modulation of rumen fermentation and microbial community through increasing dietary cation–anion difference in Chinese Holstein dairy cows under heat stress conditions , 2020, Journal of applied microbiology.

[10]  J. Jeong,et al.  The impact of short-term acute heat stress on the rumen microbiome of Hanwoo steers , 2020, Journal of animal science and technology.

[11]  T. Itoh,et al.  Evaluation of ruminal motility in cattle by a bolus-type wireless sensor , 2019, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[12]  Z. Shen,et al.  Effects of Dietary-SCFA on Microbial Protein Synthesis and Urinal Urea-N Excretion Are Related to Microbiota Diversity in Rumen , 2019, Front. Physiol..

[13]  P. Faverdin,et al.  Influence of particle size and density on mean retention time in the rumen of dairy cows. , 2019, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  N. Nishino,et al.  Rumen fluid, feces, milk, water, feed, airborne dust, and bedding microbiota in dairy farms managed by automatic milking systems. , 2019, Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho.

[15]  Jianxin Liu,et al.  Composition of Rumen Bacterial Community in Dairy Cows With Different Levels of Somatic Cell Counts , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[16]  Danil Kim,et al.  Ruminal methane emissions, metabolic, and microbial profile of Holstein steers fed forage and concentrate, separately or as a total mixed ration , 2018, PloS one.

[17]  L. Guan,et al.  Persistence of Cellulolytic Bacteria Fibrobacter and Treponema After Short-Term Corn Stover-Based Dietary Intervention Reveals the Potential to Improve Rumen Fibrolytic Function , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[18]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Invited review: Current perspectives on eating and rumination activity in dairy cows. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  T. Berchielli,et al.  Studies on bacterial community composition are affected by the time and storage method of the rumen content , 2017, PloS one.

[20]  J. Jiao,et al.  Investigation and manipulation of metabolically active methanogen community composition during rumen development in black goats , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[21]  L. Guan,et al.  Metatranscriptomic Profiling Reveals Linkages between the Active Rumen Microbiome and Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle , 2017, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[22]  J. Jiao,et al.  Changes in Metabolically Active Bacterial Community during Rumen Development, and Their Alteration by Rhubarb Root Powder Revealed by 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing , 2017, Front. Microbiol..

[23]  J. Havlík,et al.  Reclassification of Eubacterium rectale (Hauduroy et al. 1937) Prévot 1938 in a new genus Agathobacter gen. nov. as Agathobacter rectalis comb. nov., and description of Agathobacter ruminis sp. nov., isolated from the rumen contents of sheep and cows. , 2016, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[24]  P. Weimer Redundancy, resilience, and host specificity of the ruminal microbiota: implications for engineering improved ruminal fermentations , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[25]  U. Braun,et al.  Ultrasonographic assessment of reticuloruminal motility in 45 cows. , 2015, Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde.

[26]  D. Harmon,et al.  Development of a methodology to measure the effect of ergot alkaloids on forestomach motility using real-time wireless telemetry , 2014, Front. Chem..

[27]  A. Belanche,et al.  Study of methanogen communities associated with different rumen protozoal populations , 2014, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[28]  O. Bouchez,et al.  Establishment of ruminal bacterial community in dairy calves from birth to weaning is sequential , 2014, Journal of applied microbiology.

[29]  Adarsh M. Kumar,et al.  Ultrasonographic Examination of the Rumen in Healthy Cows , 2011, Veterinary medicine international.

[30]  S. Koike,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity and dietary association of rumen Treponema revealed using group-specific 16S rRNA gene-based analysis. , 2011, FEMS microbiology letters.

[31]  J. Russell,et al.  Protein and Energy as an Integrated System. Relationship of Ruminal Protein and Carbohydrate Availability to Microbial Synthesis and Milk Production , 1988 .

[32]  J. Czerkawski,et al.  Design and development of a long-term rumen simulation technique (Rusitec) , 1977, British Journal of Nutrition.

[33]  B. Crooker,et al.  Effects of Differential Solid-Liquid Removal Rates on Protozoa Numbers in Continous Cultures of Rumen Contents , 1976 .

[34]  L. Demling The motility of the gastro-intestinal tract. , 1969, Digestion.

[35]  J. Jiao,et al.  Nutrient digestion, rumen fermentation and performance as ramie (Boehmeria nivea) is increased in the diets of goats , 2019, Animal Feed Science and Technology.

[36]  Chuanshe Zhou,et al.  Comparison of two live Bacillus species as feed additives for improving in vitro fermentation of cereal straws. , 2016, Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho.

[37]  G. Coleman,et al.  The Rumen Protozoa , 1992, Brock/Springer Series in Contemporary Bioscience.

[38]  E. Mcdougall Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. , 1948, The Biochemical journal.