Optimal tuning and assessment of inertial dampers with grounded inerter for vibration control of seismically excited base-isolated systems

In this paper, the concept of an ideal grounded linear inerter, endowing supplemental inertia to passive linear tuned mass-dampers (TMDs) through its inertance property without increasing the TMD mass, is considered to reduce lateral displacement demands in base isolated structural systems (BISs). Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design parameters are numerically determined to maximize energy dissipation by the TMDI under stationary white noise support excitation. Performance of these optimally designed TMDI-equipped BISs is assessed for stationary white and colored noise excitations as well as for four recorded earthquake acceleration ground motions (GMs) with different non-stationary frequency content. It is found that for fixed mass ratio the inclusion of the grounded inerter reduces significantly secondary mass displacement and stroke for all considered excitations while it improves appreciably BIS displacement demands except for the particular case of a near-fault accelerogram characterized by early arrival of a high-energy low-frequency pulse as captured in its wavelet spectrogram. More importantly, it leads further to reductions to BIS acceleration demands with the exception of colored noise excitation for which an insignificant increase is noted. The positive effects of the inerter saturate with increasing inertance and BIS damping ratio demonstrating that small inertance values are more effective in vibration suppression of BISs with low inherent damping. Overall, it is recommended to combine low damping isolation layers with large inertance and low secondary mass TMDIs.

[1]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Performance measures and optimal design of linear structural systems under stochastic stationary excitation , 2010 .

[2]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[3]  Anna Reggio,et al.  Optimal design of an equipment isolation system with nonlinear hysteretic behaviour , 2013 .

[4]  B. A. Olmos,et al.  Applicability of Equivalent Linearization Methods to Irregular Isolated Bridges , 2017 .

[5]  Akira Nishitani,et al.  Optimum design for more effective tuned mass damper system and its application to base‐isolated buildings , 2014 .

[6]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Optimal design of a novel tuned mass-damper–inerter (TMDI) passive vibration control configuration for stochastically support-excited structural systems , 2014 .

[7]  M. De Angelis,et al.  Optimal design and performance evaluation of systems with Tuned Mass Damper Inerter (TMDI) , 2017 .

[8]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Effect of tuned mass damper on displacement demand of base-isolated structures , 2008 .

[9]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  The tuned mass-damper-inerter for harmonic vibrations suppression, attached mass reduction, and energy harvesting , 2017 .

[10]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Base isolation for near‐fault motions , 2001 .

[11]  Hsiang-Chuan Tsai,et al.  The effect of tuned-mass dampers on the seismic response of base-isolated structures , 1995 .

[12]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Seismic behavior of isolated bridges: A-state-of-the-art review , 2003 .

[13]  Keri L. Ryan,et al.  Evaluation of Approaches to Characterize Seismic Isolation Systems for Design , 2009 .

[14]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions Using Wavelet Analysis , 2007 .

[15]  Yu-Kweng Michael Lin Probabilistic Theory of Structural Dynamics , 1976 .

[16]  David J. Wagg,et al.  Using an inerter‐based device for structural vibration suppression , 2014 .

[17]  Malcolm C. Smith Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[18]  M. De Angelis,et al.  Seismic response mitigation of chemical plant components by passive control techniques , 2013 .

[19]  Anna Reggio,et al.  Combined primary-secondary system approach to the design of an equipment isolation system with High-Damping Rubber Bearings , 2014 .

[20]  Yunfeng Zhang,et al.  PROTECTING BASE-ISOLATED STRUCTURES FROM NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTION BY TUNED INTERACTION DAMPER , 2002 .

[21]  A. P,et al.  Mechanical Vibrations , 1948, Nature.

[22]  Luigi Petti,et al.  SMALL SCALE EXPERIMENTAL TESTING TO VERIFY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BASE ISOLATION AND TUNED MASS DAMPERS COMBINED CONTROL STRATEGY , 2010 .

[23]  Anil C. Wijeyewickrema,et al.  Seismic response evaluation of base-isolated reinforced concrete buildings under bidirectional excitation , 2017, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[24]  Keri L. Ryan,et al.  A Review of Seismic Isolation for Buildings: Historical Development and Research Needs , 2012 .

[25]  Murat Dicleli,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of equivalent linear analysis method for seismic-isolated structures represented by sdof systems , 2007 .

[26]  Luigi Petti,et al.  Response of base isolated systems equipped with tuned mass dampers to random excitations , 1997 .

[27]  Zhao Chen,et al.  Viscoelastically Supported Viscous Mass Damper Incorporated into a Seismic Isolation System , 2016 .

[28]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[29]  James M. Kelly,et al.  The role of damping in seismic isolation , 1999 .

[30]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark Control Problems for Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings , 2004 .

[31]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas , 2008 .

[32]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  SEISMIC ISOLATION OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS , 2014 .

[33]  D. De Domenico,et al.  An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) , 2018 .

[34]  S. Nakaminami,et al.  APPLICATION OF ROTARY INERTIA TO DISPLACEMENT REDUCTION FOR VIBRATION CONTROL SYSTEM , 2002 .

[35]  Masato Saitoh,et al.  On the performance of gyro‐mass devices for displacement mitigation in base isolation systems , 2012 .

[36]  M. De Angelis,et al.  Experimental investigation on the seismic response of a steel liquid storage tank equipped with floating roof by shaking table tests , 2009 .

[37]  S C Liu,et al.  Aseismic Hybrid Control Systems for Building Structures , 1991 .

[38]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Dynamic characterization of two-degree-of-freedom equipment-structure systems , 1985 .

[39]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Derivation of response spectrum compatible non-stationary stochastic processes relying on Monte Carlo-based peak factor estimation , 2012 .

[40]  Salvatore Perno,et al.  Dynamic response and optimal design of structures with large mass ratio TMD , 2012 .

[41]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Optimal tuned mass‐damper‐inerter (TMDI) design for seismically excited MDOF structures with model uncertainties based on reliability criteria , 2018 .

[42]  Anna Reggio,et al.  Optimal energy‐based seismic design of non‐conventional Tuned Mass Damper (TMD) implemented via inter‐story isolation , 2015 .

[43]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Numerical Treatment of Seismic Accelerograms and of Inelastic Seismic Structural Responses Using Harmonic Wavelets , 2007, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[44]  Mustafa Erdik,et al.  A comparative evaluation of design provisions for seismically isolated buildings , 2016 .