暂无分享,去创建一个
Simon Badger | Joseph Aylett-Bullock | Ryan Moodie | S. Badger | Joseph Aylett-Bullock | Ryan Moodie
[1] Z. Kunszt,et al. Three-jet cross sections to next-to-leading order , 1995, hep-ph/9512328.
[2] Damian Podareanu,et al. Event generation and statistical sampling for physics with deep generative models and a density information buffer , 2019, Nature Communications.
[3] Ansgar Denner,et al. J an 2 01 8 R E C O L A 2 REcursive Computation of One-Loop Amplitudes 2 ✩ Version 2 . 0 , 2018 .
[4] Michelle P. Kuchera,et al. Simulation of electron-proton scattering events by a Feature-Augmented and Transformed Generative Adversarial Network (FAT-GAN) , 2020, IJCAI.
[5] Yoshua Bengio,et al. Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, NIPS.
[6] A. Butter,et al. Generative Networks for LHC Events , 2020, Artificial Intelligence for High Energy Physics.
[7] Sana Ketabchi Haghighat,et al. DijetGAN: a Generative-Adversarial Network approach for the simulation of QCD dijet events at the LHC , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[8] J. Monk,et al. Deep learning as a parton shower , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[9] A. Mitov,et al. Two-loop leading-colour QCD helicity amplitudes for two-photon plus jet production at the LHC , 2021, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[10] S. Hoeche,et al. Next-to-leading order γγ+2-jet production at the LHC , 2014, 1402.4127.
[11] John D. Hunter,et al. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.
[12] J. Latorre,et al. Parton distributions for the LHC run II , 2014, 1410.8849.
[13] M. Huber,et al. A proposal for a standard interface between Monte Carlo tools and one-loop programs , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[14] Maurizio Pierini,et al. LHC analysis-specific datasets with Generative Adversarial Networks , 2019, ArXiv.
[15] R. Frederix,et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations , 2014, 1405.0301.
[16] Danna Zhou,et al. d. , 1840, Microbial pathogenesis.
[17] Bruce Mellado,et al. The use of Generative Adversarial Networks to characterise new physics in multi-lepton final states at the LHC , 2021, ArXiv.
[18] P. Ambrozewicz,et al. AI-based Monte Carlo event generator for electron-proton scattering , 2020 .
[19] D. Maitre,et al. An Automated Implementation of On-shell Methods for One-Loop Amplitudes , 2008, 0803.4180.
[20] Wes McKinney,et al. Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python , 2010, SciPy.
[21] G. G. Stokes. "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[22] L. Tancredi,et al. Two-loop leading colour QCD corrections to $$ q\overline{q} $$ → γγg and qg → γγq , 2021 .
[23] Christina Gao,et al. i- flow: High-dimensional integration and sampling with normalizing flows , 2020, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol..
[24] R. S. Thorne,et al. Parton distributions for the LHC , 2007, 0901.0002.
[25] Stefano Carrazza,et al. Lund jet images from generative and cycle-consistent adversarial networks , 2019, ArXiv.
[26] A. Guffanti,et al. Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to di-photon production in association with up to three jets at the Large Hadron Collider , 2013, 1312.5927.
[27] Andy Buckley,et al. Xsec: the cross-section evaluation code , 2020, The European Physical Journal C.
[28] S. Moretti,et al. HERWIG 6: an event generator for hadron emission reactions with interfering gluons (including supersymmetric processes) , 2001 .
[29] Gorjan Alagic,et al. #p , 2019, Quantum information & computation.
[30] Simon Badger,et al. Using neural networks for efficient evaluation of high multiplicity scattering amplitudes , 2020 .
[31] M. Cacciari,et al. The anti-$k_t$ jet clustering algorithm , 2008, 0802.1189.
[32] F. Bishara,et al. Machine learning amplitudes for faster event generation , 2019, Physical Review D.
[33] Tilman Plehn,et al. How to GAN event subtraction , 2019 .
[34] Matthew D. Klimek,et al. Improved neural network Monte Carlo simulation , 2020, 2009.07819.
[35] J. Latorre,et al. Parton distributions from high-precision collider data , 2017, The European Physical Journal C.
[36] B. Nachman,et al. Neural resampler for Monte Carlo reweighting with preserved uncertainties , 2020, Physical Review D.
[37] Jimmy Ba,et al. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.
[38] S. Lloyd,et al. LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era , 2014, The European Physical Journal C.
[39] A. S. Mete,et al. Measurements of integrated and differential cross sections for isolated photon pair production in pp collisions at ffiffi s p = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector , 2017 .
[40] Miss A.O. Penney. (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[41] SHiP Collaboration. Fast simulation of muons produced at the SHiP experiment using Generative Adversarial Networks , 2019, Journal of Instrumentation.
[42] Thorsten Ohl,et al. Vegas revisited : Adaptive Monte Carlo integration beyond factorization , 1998, hep-ph/9806432.
[43] S. Borowka,et al. Higgs Boson Pair Production in Gluon Fusion at Next-to-Leading Order with Full Top-Quark Mass Dependence. , 2016, Physical review letters.
[44] M. Kerner,et al. NLO predictions for Higgs boson pair production with full top quark mass dependence matched to parton showers , 2017, 1703.09252.
[45] M. Gigg,et al. Herwig++ physics and manual , 2008, 0803.0883.
[46] Tilman Plehn,et al. How to GAN LHC events , 2019, SciPost Physics.
[47] L. Tancredi,et al. Two-Loop Helicity Amplitudes for Diphoton Plus Jet Production in Full Color , 2021, Physical Review Letters.
[48] R. Ruiz de Austri,et al. DeepXS: fast approximation of MSSM electroweak cross sections at NLO , 2018, The European Physical Journal C.
[49] Enrico Bothmann,et al. Reweighting a parton shower using a neural network: the final-state case , 2018, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[50] Tim Stelzer,et al. Automation of next-to-leading order computations in QCD: the FKS subtraction , 2009, 0908.4272.
[51] Christina Gao,et al. Event generation with normalizing flows , 2020 .
[52] G. Luisoni,et al. Next-to-Leading-Order QCD Corrections to Higgs Boson Plus Jet Production with Full Top-Quark Mass Dependence. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[53] Peter Uwer,et al. Numerical evaluation of virtual corrections to multi-jet production in massless QCD , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[54] S. D. Ellis,et al. A New Monte Carlo Treatment of Multiparticle Phase Space at High-energies , 1986 .
[55] Andy Buckley,et al. Rivet user manual , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[56] Guigang Zhang,et al. Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..
[57] M. Cacciari,et al. FastJet user manual , 2011, 1111.6097.
[58] Johannes Bellm,et al. Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note , 2015, 1512.01178.
[59] Benjamin Nachman,et al. A Living Review of Machine Learning for Particle Physics , 2021, ArXiv.
[60] L. Scyboz,et al. Probing the trilinear Higgs boson coupling in di-Higgs production at NLO QCD including parton shower effects , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[61] S. Mrenna,et al. Pythia 6.3 physics and manual , 2003, hep-ph/0308153.
[62] M. Czakon. Tops from light quarks : Full mass dependence at two-loops in QCD , 2008, 0803.1400.
[63] S. Höche,et al. Ntuples for NLO events at hadron colliders , 2013, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[64] A. De Freitas,et al. Two-loop amplitudes for gluon fusion into two photons , 2001 .
[65] Yoshua Bengio,et al. NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimation , 2014, ICLR.
[66] A. Mitov,et al. NNLO QCD corrections to diphoton production with an additional jet at the LHC , 2021, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[67] S. Frixione,et al. ISOLATED PHOTONS IN PERTURBATIVE QCD , 1998 .
[69] Steffen Schumann,et al. Event generation with Sherpa 2.2 , 2019, SciPost Physics.
[70] G. Kasieczka,et al. GANplifying event samples , 2020, SciPost Physics.
[71] Luke de Oliveira,et al. Learning Particle Physics by Example: Location-Aware Generative Adversarial Networks for Physics Synthesis , 2017, Computing and Software for Big Science.
[72] Steffen Schumann,et al. Exploring phase space with Neural Importance Sampling , 2020 .
[73] Joshua Bendavid,et al. Efficient Monte Carlo Integration Using Boosted Decision Trees and Generative Deep Neural Networks , 2017, 1707.00028.
[74] Rob Verheyen,et al. Phase space sampling and inference from weighted events with autoregressive flows , 2020, SciPost Physics.
[75] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines , 2010, ICML.
[76] Fred L. Drake,et al. Python 3 Reference Manual , 2009 .
[77] N. Greiner,et al. Precise QCD predictions for the production of a photon pair in association with two jets. , 2013, Physical review letters.
[78] M. Marcoli,et al. Virtual QCD corrections to gluon-initiated diphoton plus jet production at hadron colliders , 2021, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[79] K. Jarrod Millman,et al. Array programming with NumPy , 2020, Nat..
[80] Tsuyoshi Murata,et al. {m , 1934, ACML.
[81] Peter Skands,et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 , 2014, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[82] N(N)LO event files: applications and prospects , 2016, 1607.06259.
[83] Matthew D. Klimek,et al. Neural network-based approach to phase space integration , 2018, SciPost Physics.
[84] Michal Czakon,et al. Helac-nlo , 2011, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[85] L. Lonnblad,et al. Robust Independent Validation of Experiment and Theory: Rivet version 3 , 2019 .
[86] Gudrun Heinrich,et al. Update of the Binoth Les Houches Accord for a standard interface between Monte Carlo tools and one-loop programs , 2013, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[87] F. Siegert,et al. Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 , 2008, 0811.4622.
[88] E. Byckling,et al. Particle Kinematics : (Chapters I-VI, X) , 1971 .
[89] Tiziano Peraro,et al. FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[90] Kosei Dohi,et al. Variational Autoencoders for Jet Simulation , 2020, 2009.04842.
[91] Shakir Mohamed,et al. Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows , 2015, ICML.