Spatial Organization of Five-Fold Morphology as a Source of Geometrical Constraint in Biology

A basic pattern in the body plan architecture of many animals, plants and some molecular and cellular systems is five-part units. This pattern has been understood as a result of genetic blueprints in development and as a widely conserved evolutionary character. Despite some efforts, a definitive explanation of the abundance of pentagonal symmetry at so many levels of complexity is still missing. Based on both, a computational platform and a statistical spatial organization argument, we show that five-fold morphology is substantially different from other abundant symmetries like three-fold, four-fold and six-fold symmetries in terms of spatial interacting elements. We develop a measuring system to determine levels of spatial organization in 2D polygons (homogeneous or heterogeneous partition of defined areas) based on principles of regularity in a morphospace. We found that spatial organization of five-fold symmetry is statistically higher than all other symmetries studied here (3 to 10-fold symmetries) in terms of spatial homogeneity. The significance of our findings is based on the statistical constancy of geometrical constraints derived from spatial organization of shapes, beyond the material or complexity level of the many different systems where pentagonal symmetry occurs.

[1]  J. Aragón,et al.  Eutacticity in Sea Urchin Evolution , 2007, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[2]  Jinsheng Kang,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Elizabeth R. Chen,et al.  Complexity in surfaces of densest packings for families of polyhedra , 2013, 1309.2662.

[4]  B. David,et al.  Radial Symmetry, the Anterior/Posterior Axis, and Echinoderm Hox Genes , 2008 .

[5]  P. Damasceno,et al.  Predictive Self-Assembly of Polyhedra into Complex Structures , 2012, Science.

[6]  George R. McGhee,et al.  The Geometry of Evolution: Adaptive Landscapes and Theoretical Morphospaces , 2006 .

[7]  R. Raff,et al.  Hox genes in a pentameral animal. , 2001, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[8]  A. Møller,et al.  Insect preference for symmetrical artificial flowers , 1998, Oecologia.

[9]  A. Møller,et al.  Pollinator preference for symmetrical flowers and sexual selection in plants , 1995 .

[10]  D. Stephenson Pentameral Symmetry in Echinoderms , 1967, Nature.

[11]  R. Raff Understanding Evolution: The Next Step. (Book Reviews: The Shape of Life. Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form.) , 1996 .

[12]  Leo W. Buss,et al.  “The arrival of the fittest”: Toward a theory of biological organization , 1994 .

[13]  Juan López-Sauceda,et al.  A Method to Categorize 2-Dimensional Patterns Using Statistics of Spatial Organization , 2017, Evolutionary bioinformatics online.

[14]  F. Hotchkiss On the Number of Rays in Starfish , 2022 .

[15]  G. Wagner HOMOLOGUES, NATURAL KINDS AND THE EVOLUTION OF MODULARITY , 1996 .

[16]  P K Maini,et al.  Turing patterns with pentagonal symmetry. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  György Darvas Symmetry: Cultural-historical and Ontological Aspects of Science-Arts Relations; the Natural and Man-made World in an Interdisciplinary Approach , 2007 .

[18]  Simon Conway Morris,et al.  The shape of life, genes, development, and the evolution of animal form , 1996 .

[19]  A. Smith Deuterostomes in a twist: the origins of a radical new body plan , 2008, Evolution & development.

[20]  J. Aragón,et al.  Regularity in irregular echinoids , 2002, Journal of mathematical biology.

[21]  J. Finnerty,et al.  The Radiata and the evolutionary origins of the bilaterian body plan. , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[22]  Gail L. Grabowsky SYMMETRY, LOCOMOTION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF AN ANTERIOR END: A LESSON FROM SEA URCHINS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  E. Davidson,et al.  Spatial expression of Hox cluster genes in the ontogeny of a sea urchin. , 2000, Development.