Does the patient‐held record improve continuity and related outcomes in cancer care: a systematic review

Objectives  To assess the effectiveness of the patient‐held record (PHR) in cancer care.

[1]  E. Latimer,et al.  A Patient Care Travelling Record for Palliative Care: A Feasibility Study , 1991, Journal of palliative care.

[2]  L. Gillham.  Palliative Care for People with Cancer , 2002 .

[3]  J. Harcourt,et al.  The acceptability of patients with cancer holding their own shared‐care record , 1996 .

[4]  C. Hendry,et al.  Reviewing the literature: a guide for students. , 1998, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[5]  P. Mayor,et al.  A patient-held record for cancer patients from diagnosis onwards. , 2002, International journal of palliative nursing.

[6]  A. Richardson.  Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. , 2003, Nursing times.

[7]  I Finlay,et al.  Use of an unstructured patient-held record in palliative care , 1998, Palliative medicine.

[8]  C. Adair,et al.  Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  E. Latimer,et al.  The Patient Care Travelling Record in palliative care: effectiveness and efficiency. , 1998, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[10]  A. Donner,et al.  Evaluation of a palliative care service: problems and pitfalls , 1994, BMJ.

[11]  Irene J. Higginson,et al.  Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer: Research Evidence , 2004 .

[12]  S Bond,et al.  Evaluation of a patient-held record for patients with cancer. , 2002, European journal of cancer care.

[13]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Patients with cancer holding their own records: a randomised controlled trial. , 2000, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[14]  J. Kleijnen,et al.  Methodologic issues in effectiveness research on palliative cancer care: a systematic review. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Evaluating Interventions to Promote Patient Involvement in Decision-Making: By What Criteria Should Effectiveness be Judged? , 1998, Journal of health services research & policy.

[16]  Arja Andersson,et al.  Care Diaries: A Way of Increasing Head and Neck Cancer Patient's Involvement in Their Own Care and the Communication Between Clinicians , 2004, Cancer nursing.

[17]  Penny Wyatt,et al.  Randomised cross-over study of patient-held records in oncology and palliative care , 1999, The Lancet.

[18]  Senga Bond,et al.  Patient-held records in cancer and palliative care: a randomized, prospective trial , 2002, Palliative medicine.

[19]  S. Hawker,et al.  Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically , 2002, Qualitative health research.

[20]  E van der Does,et al.  Continuity of information in cancer care: evaluation of a logbook. , 1997, Patient education and counseling.

[21]  M. Cornbleet,et al.  Encounters with doctors: quantity and quality , 1999, Palliative medicine.

[22]  S. Hawker,et al.  The communication of information about older people between health and social care practitioners. , 2002, Age and ageing.

[23]  S. Payne,et al.  Terminally ill patients' and lay-carers' perceptions and experiences of community-based services. , 1999, Journal of advanced nursing.

[24]  I. Finlay,et al.  Pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate the use of patient held records for the continuing care of patients with cancer , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.