Analysis of Two Simulated In-field Chipping and Extraction Systems in Spruce Thinnings

The productivity, cost and fuel-consumption rates for two wood-chip production systems were tested using computer simulation. Both systems included the same terrain-going chip harvester. In the first system, it was supported by a bin forwarder, whereas in the second system, the chip harvester had to cease operations and extract the load once the bin was filled. A largely deterministic base simulation was carried out to illustrate the effects of machine interaction, bin size, chipper productivity, in-field extraction distance, and forest-road haulage distance. Very low turnround times and increased bin size (10, 15 and 20 m 3 ) were beneficial to the single machine system, while increased chipper productivity (40, 50 and 60 m 3  h −1 ) improved the feasibility of the two-machine system, irrespective of bin size. An applied simulation included a larger stochastic component, and showed that for a 15 m 3 bin, there was a 95% probability that the single-machine system was between 0 · 18 € and 0 · 41 € m - 3 [loose volume, l.v.] more costly than the two-machine system under typical Danish conditions. Fuel consumption also exceeded that for the two-machine system by between 0·24 and 0·30  l  m −3 [l.v].

[1]  Raymond L. Desjardins,et al.  Simulated Farm Fieldwork, Energy Consumption and Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Canada , 2003 .

[2]  R Taylor,et al.  Simulation as an essential tool for advanced manufacturing technology problems , 2000 .

[3]  Nicholas P. Cheremisinoff,et al.  Wood for energy production , 1980 .

[4]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Regional production and utilization of biomass in Sweden , 1996 .

[5]  Jb Hudson,et al.  Integrated harvesting systems , 1992 .

[6]  Morten Ingerslev,et al.  Main Findings and Future Challenges in Forest Nutritional Research and Management in the Nordic Countries , 2001 .

[7]  Antti Asikainen Chipping terminal logistics , 1998 .

[8]  Colin Price,et al.  The theory and application of forest economics , 1989 .

[9]  P. Hakkila,et al.  Bioenergy from sustainable forestry : guiding principles and practice , 2002 .

[10]  Lars Eliasson,et al.  Simulation of thinning with a single-grip harvester , 1999 .

[11]  Bruce R. Hartsough,et al.  A survey of Italian chipping operations , 2001 .

[12]  Shane Ward,et al.  Energy Audit of Wood Harvesting Systems , 2003 .

[13]  C. R. Silversides,et al.  Operational Efficiency in Forestry , 1988, Forestry Sciences.

[14]  M. Browne,et al.  Logistics management and costs of biomass fuel supply , 1998 .

[15]  T. Nord‐Larsen Stand and site productivity response following whole-tree harvesting in early thinnings of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) , 2002 .

[16]  Unfccc Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[17]  Sebastian Oberthür,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol , 1999 .

[18]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Stand, Harvest, and Equipment Interactions in Simulated Harvesting Prescriptions , 1998 .

[19]  Staffan Berg Harvesting technology and market forces affecting the production of forest fuels from Swedish forestry , 2003 .

[20]  T. Ranta,et al.  Logging residues from regeneration fellings for biofuel production - a GIS-based availability and supply cost analysis , 2002 .

[21]  Ljusk Ola Eriksson,et al.  Optimal storing, transport and processing for a forest-fuel supplier , 1989 .

[22]  Lauri Sikanen,et al.  Discrete event simulation model for purchasing of marked stands, timber harvesting and transportation , 2000 .

[23]  G. Forsberg Biomass energy transport: Analysis of bioenergy transport chains using life cycle inventory method , 2000 .