Proposed criteria for reporting the development and evaluation of complex interventions in healthcare (CReDECI): guideline development.

Methods of research on complex interventions have received increasing awareness in nursing and health care science. The British Medical Research Council's (MRC) framework on the development and evaluation of complex interventions has been widely applied. It does, however, not specifically support authors to comprehensively and transparently report their complex study to ensure interpretation of study results and replicability of the intervention. So far, no reporting criteria for the development and evaluation of complex interventions have been published. Based on the updated MRC framework and corresponding methodological literature, a set of criteria on the reporting and evaluation of complex interventions has been developed and reviewed by experts in the field. As a result, a criteria list comprising 16 items has been created covering the first three stages of the MRC framework: (1) development; (2) feasibility and piloting; and (3) introduction of the intervention and evaluation. The list provides a minimum standard of criteria necessary to ensure high quality reporting of studies on the development and evaluation of complex interventions. In a final step, the reporting criteria on complex interventions have to pass a formal consensus process according to the methods recommended by the EQUATOR network.

[1]  A. Farmer,et al.  Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Reviewing evidence on complex social interventions: appraising implementation in systematic reviews of the health effects of organisational-level workplace interventions , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[3]  Alan Shiell,et al.  Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial , 2004, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[4]  M. Cupples,et al.  Monitoring treatment fidelity in a randomized controlled trial of a complex intervention. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[5]  Evan Mayo-Wilson,et al.  Reporting implementation in randomized trials: proposed additions to the consolidated standards of reporting trials statement. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[6]  D. Mant,et al.  Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP) , 1999 .

[7]  Susan Michie,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions , 2015 .

[8]  M. Grypdonck,et al.  The development of evidence-based nursing interventions: methodological considerations. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  R. Melis,et al.  Multifactorial fall prevention for pairs of frail community-dwelling older fallers and their informal caregivers: a dead end for complex interventions in the frailest fallers. , 2011, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[10]  G. Meyer,et al.  Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints in long-term geriatric care. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  Rafael Perera,et al.  Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Elizabeth Allen,et al.  Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Susan Michie,et al.  Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[14]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Can We Systematically Review Studies That Evaluate Complex Interventions? , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[15]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsqqq , 2018 .

[16]  B. Blackwood,et al.  Methodological issues in evaluating complex healthcare interventions. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[17]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  T. Schacker,et al.  Clinical and Epidemiologic Features of Primary HIV Infection , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  D. Moher,et al.  Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[20]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  D. Moher,et al.  Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[22]  D. Moher,et al.  Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  Alan Shiell,et al.  Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  Elizabeth Waters,et al.  Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND and CONSORT. , 2008, Journal of public health.

[25]  H. Burrage,et al.  Epidemiology and community health: a strained connection? , 1987, Social science & medicine.

[26]  Carl Thompson,et al.  Do educational interventions improve nurses' clinical decision making and judgement? A systematic review. , 2011, International journal of nursing studies.

[27]  G. Borglin,et al.  Complex interventions and nursing: looking through a new lens at nursing research. , 2011, International journal of nursing studies.

[28]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[29]  Sam Porter,et al.  On the problems of mixing RCTs with qualitative research: the case of the MRC framework for the evaluation of complex healthcare interventions , 2010 .