Statistical evaluation of chronic toxicity data on aquatic organisms for the hazard identification: the chemicals toxicity distribution approach.

Presently, in the Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals the classification of substances for long-term effects to aquatic life is based on acute toxicity in combination with degradation and/or bioaccumulation potential. Recently an OECD Working Group was created to develop the classification scheme to accommodate chronic toxicity data related to aquatic organisms for assigning a chronic hazard category. This study focuses on a new approach for setting chronic toxicity cut-off values based on Chemicals Toxicity Distributions (CTDs). A CTD is obtained through statistical fitting of the data used by regulatory bodies for setting hazard-based classifications. The CTDs were made using the lowest aquatic NOEC value of each chemical. A review of different toxicological sources reporting acute aquatic toxicities was carried out. Initially, the data were arranged according to the specific source and distributions for key taxonomic groups (i.e. fishes, crustaceans and algae) were evaluated separately. In most cases, no significant departures from normality were observed. Thereafter, a compiled database containing >900 values was developed and the CTDs were constructed for each taxonomic group. Significant deviation from normality (P < 0.05) was observed in the fishes and crustaceans' CTDs. However, this deviation was apparently produced by the presence of only seven values with NOECs <1 x 10(-5) mg l(-1), while high correlation between the data and the normal scores (r-values>or= 0.989) indicated that the data were samples from normal distributions. From these observations, potential cut-off values would allow quantitative estimations of the percentage of chemicals falling into each specific category. This approach results in a simple classification hazard scheme where most chemicals are covered in one of the categories, allowing a clear distribution of the chemicals among three categories for chronic toxicity.

[1]  Allanou Remi,et al.  Public Availability of Data on EU High Production Volume Chemicals. Part 1. , 2003 .

[2]  D. I. Mount,et al.  A Method for Establishing Acceptable Toxicant Limits for Fish—Malathion and the Butoxyethanol Ester of 2,4-D , 1967 .

[3]  J Smeets The EEC policy in the hazard assessment of new chemicals. , 1982, Archives of toxicology. Supplement. = Archiv fur Toxikologie. Supplement.

[4]  P. Ciffroy,et al.  Acute‐to‐chronic species sensitivity distribution extrapolation , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  J W Bridges,et al.  Hazard identification by methods of animal-based toxicology. , 2002, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[6]  I. Pratt Global harmonisation of classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals. , 2002, Toxicology Letters.

[7]  G. Suter,et al.  Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology , 2001 .

[8]  E. E. Kenaga,et al.  Predictability of chronic toxicity from acute toxicity of chemicals in fish and aquatic invertebrates , 1982 .

[9]  Jennifer C Silk,et al.  Development of a globally harmonized system for hazard communication. , 2003, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[10]  D. DeForest,et al.  Assessing acute and chronic copper risks to freshwater aquatic life using species sensitivity distributions for different taxonomic groups , 2001, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[11]  A. Lundgren Environmental hazard classification of chemicals. , 1992, Toxicology letters.

[12]  P. Ciffroy,et al.  Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[13]  Thomas H. Hutchinson,et al.  Analysis of the ecetoc aquatic toxicity (EAT) database II — Comparison of acute to chronic ratios for various aquatic organisms and chemical substances , 1998 .

[14]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Transforming data , 1996 .

[15]  P. Vasseur,et al.  Comparison of four chronic toxicity tests using algae, bacteria, and invertebrates assessed with sixteen chemicals. , 2000, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[16]  Alastair C. Wardlaw,et al.  Practical Statistics for Experimental Biologists , 1985 .

[17]  D. R. Branson Prioritization of chemicals according to the degree of hazard in the aquatic environment , 1980, Environmental health perspectives.

[18]  W. Heger,et al.  Acute and prolonged toxicity to aquatic organisms of new and existing chemicals and pesticides. , 1995, Chemosphere.