Sagittal Alignment of the Spine and Pelvis During Growth

Study Design. Prospective study of the sagittal plane alignment of the spine and pelvis in the normal pediatric population. Objectives. To document the sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis and its change during growth in the normal pediatric population. Summary of Background Data. Pelvic morphology as well as sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in the pediatric population are poorly defined in the literature. Methods. Five parameters were evaluated on lateral standing radiographs of 180 normal study participants 4 to 18 years of age: thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student t tests and Pearson’s coefficients (level of significance = 0.01). Results. The mean thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence values were 43.0°, 48.5°, 41.2°, 7.2° and 48.4°, respectively. There was no significant difference between males and females. Thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence were found to be weakly correlated with age, while sacral slope remained stable with growth. Conclusions. Pelvic morphology, as measured by the pelvic incidence angle, tends to increase during childhood and adolescence before stabilizing into adulthood, most likely to maintain an adequate sagittal balance in view of the physiologic and morphologic changes occurring during growth. Pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis, two position-dependent parameters, also react by increasing with age, most likely to avoid inadequate anterior displacement of the body center of gravity. Sacral slope is achieved with the standing posture and is not further significantly influenced by age. These results are important to establish baseline values for these measurementsin the pediatric population, in view of the reported association between pelvic morphology and the development of various spinal disorders such as spondylolisthesis and scoliosis.

[1]  E. Berthonnaud,et al.  Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[2]  C. Edwards,et al.  Radiographic Markers in Spondyloptosis: Implications for Spondylolisthesis Progression , 2002, Spine.

[3]  L. Lenke,et al.  Comparison of Standing Sagittal Spinal Alignment in Asymptomatic Adolescents and Adults , 1998, Spine.

[4]  Sagittal profiles of the spine. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  R. Betz,et al.  Sagittal Plane Analysis in Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients Treated with Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation , 1990, Spine.

[6]  M Bernhardt,et al.  Segmental Analysis of the Sagittal Plane Alignment of the Normal Thoracic and Lumbar Spines and Thoracolumbar Junction , 1989, Spine.

[7]  T. Beeker,et al.  Toward Standards for Posture: Postural Characteristics of the Lower Back System in Normal and Pathologic Conditions , 1985, Spine.

[8]  Kevin W. McEnery,et al.  An Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Alignment in 100 Asymptomatic Middle and Older Aged Volunteers , 1995, Spine.

[9]  K. Wood,et al.  Sagittal Profile of the Elderly , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[10]  R. Jackson,et al.  Congruent Spinopelvic Alignment on Standing Lateral Radiographs of Adult Volunteers , 2000, Spine.

[11]  R. Jackson,et al.  Pelvic Lordosis and Alignment in Spondylolisthesis , 2003, Spine.

[12]  L. Lenke,et al.  Correlation of Pelvic Incidence With Low- and High-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis , 2002, Spine.

[13]  B. Boisaubert,et al.  The sagittal anatomy of the sacrum among young adults, infants, and spondylolisthesis patients , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[14]  C. Marty,et al.  Equilibre sagittal du rachis. Relations entre bassin et courbures rachidiennes sagittales en position debout , 1993 .

[15]  Paolo Mangione,et al.  Study of the course of the incidence angle during growth , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[16]  F Lavaste,et al.  Computer-assisted assessment of spinal sagittal plane radiographs. , 2001, Journal of spinal disorders.

[17]  M. Abitbol.  Evolution of the lumbosacral angle. , 1987, American journal of physical anthropology.

[18]  Tamás Illés,et al.  Sagittal plane correction in idiopathic scoliosis. , 2002, Spine.

[19]  J. Hecquet,et al.  Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[20]  Hubert Labelle,et al.  Sagittal Plane Analysis of the Spine and Pelvis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis According to the Coronal Curve Type , 2003, Spine.

[21]  G. Costanzo,et al.  Reciprocal Angulation of Vertebral Bodies in a Sagittal Plane: Approach to References for the Evaluation of Kyphosis and Lordosis , 1982, Spine.

[22]  R. Jackson,et al.  Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. , 2000, Spine.

[23]  C. Schmidt,et al.  A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: The conditions required for an economic standing position , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  M. Abitbol,et al.  Effect of posture and locomotion on energy expenditure. , 1988, American journal of physical anthropology.

[25]  W. Skalli,et al.  The Association of Sagittal Spinal and Pelvic Parameters in Asymptomatic Persons and Patients with Isthmic Spondylolisthesis , 2002, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.