The instrumental value of conceptual frameworks in educational technology research

Scholars from diverse fields and research traditions agree that the conceptual framework is a critically important component of disciplined inquiry. Yet, there is a pronounced lack of shared understanding regarding the definition and functions of conceptual frameworks, which impedes our ability to design effective research and mentor novice researchers. This paper adopts John Dewey’s instrumental view of theory to discuss the prevalent definitions of a conceptual framework, outline its key functions, dispel the popular misconceptions regarding conceptual frameworks, and suggest strategies for developing effective conceptual frameworks and communicating them to the consumers of research. Examples of hypothetical and existing empirical studies in the field of educational technology are used to illustrate the analysis. It is argued in this article that conceptual frameworks should be viewed as an instrument for organizing inquiry and creating a compelling theory-based and data-driven argument for the importance of the problem, rigor of the method, and implications for further development of theory and enhancement of practice.

[1]  Fengfeng Ke.  Computer games application within alternative classroom goal structures: cognitive, metacognitive, and affective evaluation , 2008 .

[2]  Hsin Ning Jessie Ho,et al.  Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students , 2011 .

[3]  Gary W. Ritter,et al.  Next Generation Science Standards , 2013 .

[4]  P. Pintrich.  A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. , 2003 .

[5]  Rand J. Spiro and Jihn-ChangJehng.  Cognitive Flexibility and Hypertext: Theory and Technology for the Nonlinear and Multidimensional Traversal of Complex Subject Matter , 2012 .

[6]  James Avis,et al.  Work-Based Knowledge, Evidence-Informed Practice and Education , 2003 .

[7]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[8]  J. Dewey.  Experience and Education , 1938 .

[9]  B. Hofer.  Personal Epistemology Research: Implications for Learning and Teaching , 2001 .

[10]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[11]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  The Challenge of Measuring Epistemic Beliefs: An Analysis of Three Self-Report Instruments , 2008 .

[12]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Questioning the Questions of Instructional Technology Research. , 1995 .

[13]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education , 2005, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[15]  P. Shields,et al.  Intermediate Theory: The Missing Link in Successful Student Scholarship , 2006 .

[16]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[17]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[18]  J. Dewey.  Democracy and education : an introduction to philosophy of education / John Dewey , 1916 .

[19]  R. Kozma.  Learning with Media , 1991 .

[20]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2018, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[21]  William Winn,et al.  Research into Practice: Current Trends in Educational Technology Research: The Study of Learning Environments , 2002 .

[22]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[23]  Susan M. Land,et al.  The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments , 1997 .

[24]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors , 1989 .

[25]  H. Becker.  Writing for Social Scientists: How to Start and Finish Your Thesis, Book, or Article , 2007 .

[26]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[27]  Barbara Wasson,et al.  Using scenarios to design complex technology-enhanced learning environments , 2012 .

[28]  James H. McMillan,et al.  Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction , 1984 .

[29]  Xiaoxia Newton,et al.  Research on teacher education programs: logic model approach. , 2013, Evaluation and program planning.

[30]  A. Januszewski,et al.  Educational Technology : A Definition with Commentary , 2013 .

[31]  Angus Stevenson,et al.  Concise Oxford English Dictionary , 2009 .

[32]  Ma. de la Natividad Jiménez Salas,et al.  The Conduct of Inquiry , 1967 .

[33]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real world research : a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings , 2011 .

[34]  P. Reason.  Human inquiry in action : developments in new paradigm research , 1988 .

[35]  S. Leshem,et al.  Overlooking the conceptual framework , 2007 .

[36]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[37]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and Refutations , 1963 .

[38]  R. Sawyer.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[39]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[40]  Ricardo Nemirovsky,et al.  Body Motion and Graphing , 1998 .

[41]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Publishing and perishing: The critical importance of educational design research , 2011 .

[42]  Dale S. Niederhauser,et al.  The Influence of Cognitive Load on Learning from Hypertext , 2000 .

[43]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  The Snowball Phenomenon: Spread of Ways of Talking and Ways of Thinking Across Groups of Children , 2001 .

[44]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[45]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[46]  S. Laurence,et al.  The ontology of concepts: Abstract objects or mental representations? , 2007 .

[47]  R. Spiro,et al.  The Art of Multimedia and the State of Education@@@Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology , 1992 .

[48]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[49]  K. Squire,et al.  Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground , 2004 .

[50]  R. W. Tyler.  General Statement on Evaluation , 1942 .

[51]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[52]  Sue J. Waite,et al.  Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings (3rd ed.) , 2012 .

[53]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Project-based learning , 2014 .

[54]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Language of Thought , 1980 .

[55]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[56]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The Knowledge Integration Perspective on Learning and Instruction , 2005 .

[57]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[58]  J. Bruner.  The Process of Education , 1960 .

[59]  Wei Liu,et al.  Students’ confidence and perceived value for participating in cross-cultural wiki-based collaborations , 2011 .

[60]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .