Opportunity Cost Neglect Attenuates the Effect of Choices on Preferences

The idea that choices alter preferences has been widely studied in psychology, yet prior research has focused primarily on choices for which all alternatives were salient at the time of choice. Opportunity costs capture the value of the best forgone alternative and should be considered as part of any decision process, yet people often neglect them. How does the salience of opportunity costs at the time of choice influence subsequent evaluations of chosen and forgone options? In three experiments, we found that there was a larger postchoice spread between evaluations of focal options and opportunity costs when opportunity costs were explicit at the time of choice than when they remained implicit.

[1]  Michael I. Norton,et al.  How actions create – not just reveal – preferences , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Stephen A. Spiller,et al.  Opportunity Cost Consideration , 2011 .

[3]  James J Gross,et al.  The Hidden-Zero Effect , 2008, Psychological science.

[4]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[5]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing? , 1982 .

[6]  Joseph P. Newman,et al.  The feature-positive effect in adult human subjects. , 1980 .

[7]  Steven K. Jones,et al.  Choices and opportunities: another effect of framing on decisions , 1998 .

[8]  Rom Y. Schrift,et al.  Staying the Course , 2014, Psychological science.

[9]  R. Dhar,et al.  Opportunity Cost Neglect , 2009 .

[10]  Stephen M. Fleming,et al.  Is Choice-Induced Preference Change Long Lasting? , 2012, Psychological science.

[11]  J. Brehm Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[12]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Focussing in reasoning and decision making , 1993, Cognition.

[13]  Scott T. Allison,et al.  The Feature-Positive Effect, Attitude Strength, and Degree of Perceived Consensus , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[14]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Construction of Preferences by Constraint Satisfaction , 2022 .

[15]  D. Cioffi,et al.  On Doing the Decision: Effects of Active versus Passive Choice on Commitment and Self-Perception , 1996 .

[16]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Opportunity costs and the framing of resource allocation decisions , 1986 .

[17]  Jane L. Risen,et al.  How choice affects and reflects preferences: revisiting the free-choice paradigm. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  G. Häubl,et al.  The preference-signaling effect of search , 2015 .

[19]  D. Bem Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. , 1967, Psychological review.

[20]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Decision freedom as a determinant of the role of incentive magnitude in attitude change. , 1967 .

[21]  Tali Sharot,et al.  Do Decisions Shape Preference? , 2010, Psychological science.