Identification of protein interaction partners and protein-protein interaction sites.

Rigid-body docking has become quite successful in predicting the correct conformations of binary protein complexes, at least when the constituent proteins do not undergo large conformational changes upon binding. However, determining whether two given proteins interact is a more difficult problem. Successful docking procedures often give equally good scores for proteins that do not interact experimentally. This is the case for the multiple minimization approach we use here. An analysis of the results where all proteins within a set are docked with all other proteins (complete cross-docking) shows that the predictions can be greatly improved if the location of the correct binding interface on each protein is known, since the experimental complexes are much more likely to bring these two interfaces into contact, at the same time as yielding good interaction energy scores. While various methods exist for identifying binding interfaces, it is shown that simply studying the interaction of all potential protein pairs within a data set can itself help to identify the correct interfaces.

[1]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Sophie Sacquin-Mora,et al.  Investigating the local flexibility of functional residues in hemoproteins. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Christoph A Sotriffer,et al.  "In situ cross-docking" to simultaneously address multiple targets. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  Marcin Król,et al.  Implicit flexibility in protein docking: Cross‐docking and local refinement , 2007, Proteins.

[5]  Jinn-Moon Yang,et al.  GEMDOCK: A generic evolutionary method for molecular docking , 2004, Proteins.

[6]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  A protein–protein docking benchmark , 2003, Proteins.

[7]  A. Minton Implications of macromolecular crowding for protein assembly. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[8]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Protein interaction databases. , 2001, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[9]  Irwin D Kuntz,et al.  Stability of macromolecular complexes , 2002, Proteins.

[10]  M. Zacharias,et al.  Accounting for loop flexibility during protein–protein docking , 2005, Proteins.

[11]  Jiwon Choi,et al.  Optimization of High Throughput Virtual Screening by Combining Shape-Matching and Docking Methods , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[12]  M. Sternberg,et al.  The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Jens Meiler,et al.  ROSETTALIGAND: Protein–small molecule docking with full side‐chain flexibility , 2006, Proteins.

[14]  P E Bourne,et al.  The Protein Data Bank. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al.  Prediction of interface residues in protein–protein complexes by a consensus neural network method: Test against NMR data , 2005, Proteins.

[16]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Deciphering Protein–Protein Interactions. Part II. Computational Methods to Predict Protein and Domain Interaction Partners , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  L. Presta,et al.  The 1.85 A resolution crystal structures of tissue factor in complex with humanized Fab D3h44 and of free humanized Fab D3h44: revisiting the solvation of antigen combining sites. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Allen P. Minton,et al.  Cell biology: Join the crowd , 2003, Nature.

[19]  Benjamin A. Shoemaker,et al.  Deciphering Protein–Protein Interactions. Part I. Experimental Techniques and Databases , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  S. Jones,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  L. Wyns,et al.  Three camelid VHH domains in complex with porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase. Inhibition and versatility of binding topology. , 2002, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[22]  C. Deane,et al.  Protein Interactions , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[23]  S. Wodak,et al.  Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition , 2007, Proteins.

[24]  F. Cohen,et al.  An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  C. Chothia,et al.  Principles of protein–protein recognition , 1975, Nature.

[26]  Xiaolong Wang,et al.  Exploiting residue-level and profile-level interface propensities for usage in binding sites prediction of proteins , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[27]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Protein–protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side‐chain flexibility , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[29]  J. Janin,et al.  Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Eric J. Deeds,et al.  Robust protein–protein interactions in crowded cellular environments , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Gary D Bader,et al.  BIND--The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[33]  A. Wittinghofer,et al.  How the Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoS toxin downregulates Rac , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[34]  R. Bahadur,et al.  The interface of protein-protein complexes: Analysis of contacts and prediction of interactions , 2008, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[35]  S. Wodak,et al.  Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3–5 shows progress in docking procedures , 2005, Proteins.

[36]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[37]  Sophie Sacquin-Mora,et al.  Locating the active sites of enzymes using mechanical properties , 2007, Proteins.

[38]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  S. Wodak,et al.  Hemoglobin interaction in sickle cell fibers. I: Theoretical approaches to the molecular contacts. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  B. Séraphin,et al.  A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  R. Raz,et al.  ProMate: a structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  Michael J. E. Sternberg,et al.  3D-Garden: a system for modelling protein-protein complexes based on conformational refinement of ensembles generated with the marching cubes algorithm , 2008, Bioinform..

[43]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  Olivier Lichtarge,et al.  Evolutionary trace report_maker: a new type of service for comparative analysis of proteins , 2006, Bioinform..

[45]  Roberto Dominguez,et al.  Crystal structures of the vitamin D-binding protein and its complex with actin: Structural basis of the actin-scavenger system , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[48]  Michel F Sanner,et al.  FLIPDock: Docking flexible ligands into flexible receptors , 2007, Proteins.

[49]  Janet M Thornton,et al.  Ligand selectivity and competition between enzymes in silico , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[50]  J. Janin,et al.  A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  A. Elcock Atomistic simulations of competition between substrates binding to an enzyme. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[52]  Richard M. Jackson,et al.  Predicting protein interaction sites: binding hot-spots in protein-protein and protein-ligand interfaces , 2006, Bioinform..

[53]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  A new method for ligand docking to flexible receptors by dual alanine scanning and refinement (SCARE) , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[54]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  ATTRACT: Protein–protein docking in CAPRI using a reduced protein model , 2005, Proteins.

[55]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[56]  C. Chothia,et al.  The structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[57]  Z. Weng,et al.  Protein–protein docking benchmark 2.0: An update , 2005, Proteins.