Myocardial perfusion imaging with contrast ultrasound.

This report reviews the development and clinical application of myocardial perfusion imaging with myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). This includes the development of microbubble formulations that permit the detection of left ventricular contrast from venous injection and the imaging techniques that have been invented to detect the transit of these microbubbles through the microcirculation. The methods used to quantify myocardial perfusion during a continuous infusion of microbubbles are described. A review of the clinical studies that have examined the clinical utility of myocardial perfusion imaging with MCE during rest and stress echocardiography is then presented. The limitations of MCE are also discussed.

[1]  C. Chiou,et al.  Comparison of real-time contrast echocardiography and low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting the left ventricular functional recovery in patients after acute myocardial infarction under different therapeutic intervention. , 2005, International journal of cardiology.

[2]  M. Quiñones,et al.  Microvascular Structural Correlates of Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Implications for the Assessment of Myocardial Hibernation , 2002, Circulation.

[3]  H. Torp,et al.  Quantitative adenosine real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  Successful Left Ventricular Opacification Following Peripheral Venous Injection of Sonicated Contrast Agent: An Experimental Evaluation , 1988 .

[5]  Sanjiv Kaul,et al.  Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion With Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography During Left Atrial Injection of Contrast: Implications for Venous Injection , 1994, Circulation.

[6]  Harald Becher,et al.  Contrast echocardiography: evidence-based recommendations by European Association of Echocardiography. , 2008, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  T. Porter,et al.  Comparison of low-mechanical index pulse sequence schemes for detecting myocardial perfusion abnormalities during vasodilator stress echocardiography. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  A. Pasquet,et al.  Assessment of the physiologic significance of coronary disease with dipyridamole real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography and quantitative coronary angiography. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  E. Staal,et al.  Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography in Assessment of Stable Coronary Artery Disease at Intermediate Dobutamine‐Induced Stress Level , 2009, Echocardiography.

[10]  T. Porter,et al.  Visually discernible myocardial echocardiographic contrast after intravenous injection of sonicated dextrose albumin microbubbles containing high molecular weight, less soluble gases. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  P. Ueberfuhr,et al.  Quantitative assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a comparison with conventional echocardiographic analyses and [Tc99m]-sestamibi SPECT. , 2005, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  M. Vannan,et al.  Imaging technologies and techniques. , 2004, Cardiology clinics.

[13]  F. Fedele,et al.  The extent of microvascular damage during myocardial contrast echocardiography is superior to other known indexes of post-infarct reperfusion in predicting left ventricular remodeling: results of the multicenter AMICI study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Navin C. Nanda,et al.  Advances in Echo Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement , 1997, Springer Netherlands.

[15]  O. Kamp,et al.  NC100100, a new echo contrast agent for the assessment of myocardial perfusion—safety and comparison with technetium‐99m sestamibi single‐photon emission computed tomography in a randomized multicenter study , 1999, Clinical cardiology.

[16]  Pascal Meier,et al.  The quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in humans by contrast echocardiography: algorithm and validation. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  T. Porter,et al.  Detection of myocardial perfusion in multiple echocardiographic windows with one intravenous injection of microbubbles using transient response second harmonic imaging. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  H. Dittrich,et al.  Detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease with accelerated intermittent imaging after intravenous administration of ultrasound contrast material. , 2000, American heart journal.

[19]  T. Porter,et al.  Detection of Coronary Artery Disease with a Continuous Infusion of Definity Ultrasound Contrast during Adenosine Stress Real Time Perfusion Echocardiography , 2007, Echocardiography.

[20]  M. Kostkiewicz,et al.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease. Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography and 99mTc MIBI single photon emission computed tomography. , 2003, International journal of cardiology.

[21]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Basis for detection of stenosis using venous administration of microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography: bolus or continuous infusion? , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  J. Min,et al.  Value of vasodilator stress myocardial contrast echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging for the differential diagnosis of ischemic versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[23]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Comparison of dobutamine stress echocardiography with and without real-time perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  T. Porter,et al.  Detection of subendocardial ischemia in the left anterior descending coronary artery territory with real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography during dobutamine stress echocardiography. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[25]  R. Senior,et al.  Accuracy of dipyridamole myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of residual stenosis of the infarct-related artery and multivessel disease early after acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  James D. Thomas,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: a prospective multicenter study in comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  S. Kaul,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography versus Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction score in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  M. Verani,et al.  Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion during bicycle and treadmill exercise echocardiography: comparison with single photon emission computed tomography. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  A. Elhendy,et al.  Safety of dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  J. Kasprzak,et al.  Accelerated stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: comparison with 99mTc single photon emission computed tomography. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[31]  R. Senior,et al.  Usefulness of myocardial contrast echocardiography using low-power continuous imaging early after acute myocardial infarction to predict late functional left ventricular recovery. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  N de Jong,et al.  Principles and recent developments in ultrasound contrast agents. , 1991, Ultrasonics.

[33]  H. Samady,et al.  Detection of myocardial viability by contrast echocardiography in acute infarction predicts recovery of resting function and contractile reserve. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  N. Weissman,et al.  Detection of coronary artery disease with perfusion stress echocardiography using a novel ultrasound imaging agent: two Phase 3 international trials in comparison with radionuclide perfusion imaging. , 2009, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[35]  S. Mulvagh,et al.  Safety and efficacy of commercially available ultrasound contrast agents for rest and stress echocardiography a multicenter experience. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  C. Visser,et al.  Assessment of Myocardial Reperfusion by Intravenous Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography and Coronary Flow Reserve After Primary Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angiography in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2000 .

[37]  E. Unger,et al.  Nitrogen-filled liposomes as a vascular US contrast agent: preliminary evaluation. , 1992, Radiology.

[38]  A. Kitabatake,et al.  Lack of Myocardial Perfusion Immediately After Successful Thrombolysis: A Predictor of Poor Recovery of Left Ventricular Function in Anterior Myocardial Infarction , 1992, Circulation.

[39]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. , 1998, Circulation.

[40]  J. Voigt,et al.  Real-time myocardial contrast stress echocardiography using bolus application. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[41]  H. Katus,et al.  Usefulness of real-time myocardial perfusion imaging to evaluate tissue level reperfusion in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[42]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Prognostic Value of Dobutamine Stress Myocardial Contrast Perfusion Echocardiography , 2005, Circulation.

[43]  T. Marwick,et al.  Incremental Benefit of Myocardial Contrast to Combined Dipyridamole-Exercise Stress Echocardiography for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease , 2004, Circulation.

[44]  H. Katus,et al.  Real-time myocardial perfusion imaging for pharmacologic stress testing: added value to single photon emission computed tomography. , 2006, American Heart Journal.

[45]  S. Siu,et al.  Incremental value of parametric quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by triggered Low-Power myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[46]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Coronary and myocardial blood volumes: noninvasive tools to assess the coronary microcirculation? , 1997, Circulation.

[47]  T. Porter,et al.  Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler imaging. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[48]  P. Burns,et al.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[49]  S. Kaul,et al.  Detection of coronary artery disease with myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. , 1997, Circulation.

[50]  J. C. Meneghetti,et al.  Detection of Functional Recovery Using Low‐Dose Dobutamine and Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography After Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Successful Thrombolytic Therapy , 2005, Echocardiography.

[51]  A. Magalski,et al.  Full-motion pulse inversion power Doppler contrast echocardiography differentiates stunning from necrosis and predicts recovery of left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[52]  S. Kaul,et al.  Power doppler harmonic imaging: a feasibility study of a new technique for the assessment of myocardial perfusion. , 2000, American heart journal.

[53]  B. Lüderitz,et al.  Real Time Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography During Supine Bicycle Stress and Continuous Infusion of Contrast Agent. Cutoff Values for Myocardial Contrast Replenishment Discriminating Abnormal Myocardial Perfusion , 2007, Echocardiography.

[54]  Quantitative assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a comparison with conventional echocardiographic analyses and (Tc99m)-sestamibi SPECT , 2007 .

[55]  N. Weissman,et al.  Infusion versus bolus contrast echocardiography: a multicenter, open-label, crossover trial. , 2000, American heart journal.

[56]  Carmel M. Moran,et al.  Handbook of contrast echocardiography LV function and myocardial perfusion , 2001 .

[57]  D. Cosgrove,et al.  Colour Doppler energy (power) mode ultrasound. , 1996, Clinical radiology.

[58]  R. Senior,et al.  Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts recovery of dysynergic myocardium early after acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[59]  G. Hillis,et al.  Contrast echocardiography using intravenous octafluoropropane and real-time perfusion imaging predicts functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[60]  R. Kloner,et al.  The "no-reflow" phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. , 1974, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[61]  M. Verani,et al.  Identification of Hibernating Myocardium With Quantitative Intravenous Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: Comparison With Dobutamine Echocardiography and Thallium-201 Scintigraphy , 2003, Circulation.

[62]  A. Broillet,et al.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion by intermittent harmonic power Doppler using SonoVue, a new ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[63]  G. Dwivedi,et al.  Effects of Left Bundle-Branch Block on Cardiac Structure, Function, Perfusion, and Perfusion Reserve: Implications for Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Versus Radionuclide Perfusion Imaging for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease , 2008, Circulation.

[64]  Harald Becher,et al.  American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents in Echocardiography. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[65]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Comparative accuracy of real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging and wall motion analysis during dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[66]  A. Magalski,et al.  Combined assessment of microvascular integrity and contractile reserve improves differentiation of stunning and necrosis after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[67]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging at rest and during adenosine stress: comparison with (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT imaging. , 2000, Circulation.

[68]  J Sklenar,et al.  Assessment of resting perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography: theoretical and practical considerations. , 2000, American heart journal.

[69]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Detection of myocardial perfusion defects by contrast echocardiography in the setting of acute myocardial ischemia with residual antegrade flow. , 1998, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[70]  Peter N. Burns,et al.  Imaging instrumentation for ultrasound contrast agents , 1997 .

[71]  G. Dwivedi,et al.  Prognostic value of myocardial viability detected by myocardial contrast echocardiography early after acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[72]  M. Yoshiyama,et al.  Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts regional and global left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with low dose dobutamine stress echocardiography , 2005, Heart.

[73]  A. Elhendy,et al.  Noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes by dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging. , 2005, Diabetes care.