Myocardial perfusion imaging with contrast ultrasound.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Chiou,et al. Comparison of real-time contrast echocardiography and low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting the left ventricular functional recovery in patients after acute myocardial infarction under different therapeutic intervention. , 2005, International journal of cardiology.
[2] M. Quiñones,et al. Microvascular Structural Correlates of Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Implications for the Assessment of Myocardial Hibernation , 2002, Circulation.
[3] H. Torp,et al. Quantitative adenosine real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography.
[5] Sanjiv Kaul,et al. Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion With Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography During Left Atrial Injection of Contrast: Implications for Venous Injection , 1994, Circulation.
[6] Harald Becher,et al. Contrast echocardiography: evidence-based recommendations by European Association of Echocardiography. , 2008, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.
[7] T. Porter,et al. Comparison of low-mechanical index pulse sequence schemes for detecting myocardial perfusion abnormalities during vasodilator stress echocardiography. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.
[8] A. Pasquet,et al. Assessment of the physiologic significance of coronary disease with dipyridamole real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography and quantitative coronary angiography. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[9] E. Staal,et al. Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography in Assessment of Stable Coronary Artery Disease at Intermediate Dobutamine‐Induced Stress Level , 2009, Echocardiography.
[10] T. Porter,et al. Visually discernible myocardial echocardiographic contrast after intravenous injection of sonicated dextrose albumin microbubbles containing high molecular weight, less soluble gases. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[11] P. Ueberfuhr,et al. Quantitative assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a comparison with conventional echocardiographic analyses and [Tc99m]-sestamibi SPECT. , 2005, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.
[12] M. Vannan,et al. Imaging technologies and techniques. , 2004, Cardiology clinics.
[13] F. Fedele,et al. The extent of microvascular damage during myocardial contrast echocardiography is superior to other known indexes of post-infarct reperfusion in predicting left ventricular remodeling: results of the multicenter AMICI study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[14] Navin C. Nanda,et al. Advances in Echo Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement , 1997, Springer Netherlands.
[15] O. Kamp,et al. NC100100, a new echo contrast agent for the assessment of myocardial perfusion—safety and comparison with technetium‐99m sestamibi single‐photon emission computed tomography in a randomized multicenter study , 1999, Clinical cardiology.
[16] Pascal Meier,et al. The quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in humans by contrast echocardiography: algorithm and validation. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[17] T. Porter,et al. Detection of myocardial perfusion in multiple echocardiographic windows with one intravenous injection of microbubbles using transient response second harmonic imaging. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[18] H. Dittrich,et al. Detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease with accelerated intermittent imaging after intravenous administration of ultrasound contrast material. , 2000, American heart journal.
[19] T. Porter,et al. Detection of Coronary Artery Disease with a Continuous Infusion of Definity Ultrasound Contrast during Adenosine Stress Real Time Perfusion Echocardiography , 2007, Echocardiography.
[20] M. Kostkiewicz,et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease. Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography and 99mTc MIBI single photon emission computed tomography. , 2003, International journal of cardiology.
[21] A R Jayaweera,et al. Basis for detection of stenosis using venous administration of microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography: bolus or continuous infusion? , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[22] J. Min,et al. Value of vasodilator stress myocardial contrast echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging for the differential diagnosis of ischemic versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.
[23] A. DeMaria,et al. Comparison of dobutamine stress echocardiography with and without real-time perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.
[24] T. Porter,et al. Detection of subendocardial ischemia in the left anterior descending coronary artery territory with real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography during dobutamine stress echocardiography. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[25] R. Senior,et al. Accuracy of dipyridamole myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of residual stenosis of the infarct-related artery and multivessel disease early after acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[26] James D. Thomas,et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: a prospective multicenter study in comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[27] S. Kaul,et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography versus Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction score in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[28] M. Verani,et al. Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion during bicycle and treadmill exercise echocardiography: comparison with single photon emission computed tomography. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[29] A. Elhendy,et al. Safety of dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[30] J. Kasprzak,et al. Accelerated stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: comparison with 99mTc single photon emission computed tomography. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.
[31] R. Senior,et al. Usefulness of myocardial contrast echocardiography using low-power continuous imaging early after acute myocardial infarction to predict late functional left ventricular recovery. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.
[32] N de Jong,et al. Principles and recent developments in ultrasound contrast agents. , 1991, Ultrasonics.
[33] H. Samady,et al. Detection of myocardial viability by contrast echocardiography in acute infarction predicts recovery of resting function and contractile reserve. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[34] N. Weissman,et al. Detection of coronary artery disease with perfusion stress echocardiography using a novel ultrasound imaging agent: two Phase 3 international trials in comparison with radionuclide perfusion imaging. , 2009, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.
[35] S. Mulvagh,et al. Safety and efficacy of commercially available ultrasound contrast agents for rest and stress echocardiography a multicenter experience. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[36] C. Visser,et al. Assessment of Myocardial Reperfusion by Intravenous Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography and Coronary Flow Reserve After Primary Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angiography in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2000 .
[37] E. Unger,et al. Nitrogen-filled liposomes as a vascular US contrast agent: preliminary evaluation. , 1992, Radiology.
[38] A. Kitabatake,et al. Lack of Myocardial Perfusion Immediately After Successful Thrombolysis: A Predictor of Poor Recovery of Left Ventricular Function in Anterior Myocardial Infarction , 1992, Circulation.
[39] A R Jayaweera,et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. , 1998, Circulation.
[40] J. Voigt,et al. Real-time myocardial contrast stress echocardiography using bolus application. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[41] H. Katus,et al. Usefulness of real-time myocardial perfusion imaging to evaluate tissue level reperfusion in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.
[42] James R. Anderson,et al. Prognostic Value of Dobutamine Stress Myocardial Contrast Perfusion Echocardiography , 2005, Circulation.
[43] T. Marwick,et al. Incremental Benefit of Myocardial Contrast to Combined Dipyridamole-Exercise Stress Echocardiography for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease , 2004, Circulation.
[44] H. Katus,et al. Real-time myocardial perfusion imaging for pharmacologic stress testing: added value to single photon emission computed tomography. , 2006, American Heart Journal.
[45] S. Siu,et al. Incremental value of parametric quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by triggered Low-Power myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[46] A R Jayaweera,et al. Coronary and myocardial blood volumes: noninvasive tools to assess the coronary microcirculation? , 1997, Circulation.
[47] T. Porter,et al. Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler imaging. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[48] P. Burns,et al. Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).
[49] S. Kaul,et al. Detection of coronary artery disease with myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. , 1997, Circulation.
[50] J. C. Meneghetti,et al. Detection of Functional Recovery Using Low‐Dose Dobutamine and Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography After Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Successful Thrombolytic Therapy , 2005, Echocardiography.
[51] A. Magalski,et al. Full-motion pulse inversion power Doppler contrast echocardiography differentiates stunning from necrosis and predicts recovery of left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[52] S. Kaul,et al. Power doppler harmonic imaging: a feasibility study of a new technique for the assessment of myocardial perfusion. , 2000, American heart journal.
[53] B. Lüderitz,et al. Real Time Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography During Supine Bicycle Stress and Continuous Infusion of Contrast Agent. Cutoff Values for Myocardial Contrast Replenishment Discriminating Abnormal Myocardial Perfusion , 2007, Echocardiography.
[55] N. Weissman,et al. Infusion versus bolus contrast echocardiography: a multicenter, open-label, crossover trial. , 2000, American heart journal.
[56] Carmel M. Moran,et al. Handbook of contrast echocardiography LV function and myocardial perfusion , 2001 .
[57] D. Cosgrove,et al. Colour Doppler energy (power) mode ultrasound. , 1996, Clinical radiology.
[58] R. Senior,et al. Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts recovery of dysynergic myocardium early after acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[59] G. Hillis,et al. Contrast echocardiography using intravenous octafluoropropane and real-time perfusion imaging predicts functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.
[60] R. Kloner,et al. The "no-reflow" phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. , 1974, The Journal of clinical investigation.
[61] M. Verani,et al. Identification of Hibernating Myocardium With Quantitative Intravenous Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: Comparison With Dobutamine Echocardiography and Thallium-201 Scintigraphy , 2003, Circulation.
[62] A. Broillet,et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion by intermittent harmonic power Doppler using SonoVue, a new ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, Investigative radiology.
[63] G. Dwivedi,et al. Effects of Left Bundle-Branch Block on Cardiac Structure, Function, Perfusion, and Perfusion Reserve: Implications for Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Versus Radionuclide Perfusion Imaging for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease , 2008, Circulation.
[64] Harald Becher,et al. American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents in Echocardiography. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.
[65] James R. Anderson,et al. Comparative accuracy of real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging and wall motion analysis during dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[66] A. Magalski,et al. Combined assessment of microvascular integrity and contractile reserve improves differentiation of stunning and necrosis after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[67] P. Grayburn,et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging at rest and during adenosine stress: comparison with (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT imaging. , 2000, Circulation.
[68] J Sklenar,et al. Assessment of resting perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography: theoretical and practical considerations. , 2000, American heart journal.
[69] P. Grayburn,et al. Detection of myocardial perfusion defects by contrast echocardiography in the setting of acute myocardial ischemia with residual antegrade flow. , 1998, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.
[70] Peter N. Burns,et al. Imaging instrumentation for ultrasound contrast agents , 1997 .
[71] G. Dwivedi,et al. Prognostic value of myocardial viability detected by myocardial contrast echocardiography early after acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[72] M. Yoshiyama,et al. Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts regional and global left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with low dose dobutamine stress echocardiography , 2005, Heart.
[73] A. Elhendy,et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes by dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging. , 2005, Diabetes care.