Glioblastoma survival is associated with distinct proteomic alteration signatures post chemoirradiation in a large-scale proteomic panel

Glioblastomas (GBM) are rapidly progressive, nearly uniformly fatal brain tumors. Proteomic analysis represents an opportunity for noninvasive GBM classification and biological understanding of treatment response.We analyzed differential proteomic expression pre vs. post completion of concurrent chemoirradiation (CRT) in patient serum samples to explore proteomic alterations and classify GBM by integrating clinical and proteomic parameters.82 patients with GBM were clinically annotated and serum samples obtained pre- and post-CRT. Serum samples were then screened using the aptamer-based SOMAScan® proteomic assay. Significant traits from uni- and multivariate Cox models for overall survival (OS) were designated independent prognostic factors and principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out. Differential expression of protein signals was calculated using paired t-tests, with KOBAS used to identify associated KEGG pathways. GSEA pre-ranked analysis was employed on the overall list of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) against the MSigDB Hallmark, GO Biological Process, and Reactome databases with weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) and Enrichr used to validate pathway hits internally.3 clinical clusters of patients with differential survival were identified. 389 significantly DEPs pre vs. post-treatment were identified, including 284 upregulated and 105 downregulated, representing several pathways relevant to cancer metabolism and progression. The lowest survival group (median OS 13.2 months) was associated with DEPs affiliated with proliferative pathways and exhibiting distinct oppositional response including with respect to radiation therapy related pathways, as compared to better-performing groups (intermediate, median OS 22.4 months; highest, median OS 28.7 months). Opposite signaling patterns across multiple analyses in several pathways (notably fatty acid metabolism, NOTCH, TNFα via NF-κB, Myc target V1 signaling, UV response, unfolded protein response, peroxisome, and interferon response) were distinct between clinical survival groups and supported by WGCNA. 23 proteins were statistically signficant for OS with 5 (NETO2, CST7, SEMA6D, CBLN4, NPS) supported by KM.Distinct proteomic alterations with hallmarks of cancer, including progression, resistance, stemness, and invasion, were identified in serum samples obtained from GBM patients pre vs. post CRT and corresponded with clinical survival. The proteome can potentially be employed for glioma classification and biological interrogation of cancer pathways.

[1]  Jinquan Cai,et al.  Development and validation of a pyroptosis-related genes signature for risk stratification in gliomas , 2023, Frontiers in Genetics.

[2]  I. Fournier,et al.  Spatial analysis of the glioblastoma proteome reveals specific molecular signatures and markers of survival , 2022, Nature Communications.

[3]  T. Yuan,et al.  Relative T2-FLAIR signal intensity surrounding residual cavity is associated with survival prognosis in patients with lower-grade gliomas , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.

[4]  S. Ramasamy,et al.  Ascendancy of unfolded protein response over glioblastoma: estimating progression, prognosis and survival , 2022, Biotechnology & genetic engineering reviews.

[5]  Fan-En Yuan,et al.  TGF-β induces GBM mesenchymal transition through upregulation of CLDN4 and nuclear translocation to activate TNF-α/NF-κB signal pathway , 2022, Cell Death & Disease.

[6]  B. Rah,et al.  Transforming Growth Factor-Beta (TGF-β) Signaling in Cancer-A Betrayal Within , 2022, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[7]  J. Malmström,et al.  Landscape of surfaceome and endocytome in human glioma is divergent and depends on cellular spatial organization , 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Xin Jia,et al.  A Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Survival Stratification in Glioblastoma Patients With Standard Treatment , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.

[9]  Ugljesa Djuric,et al.  Topographic mapping of the glioblastoma proteome reveals a triple-axis model of intra-tumoral heterogeneity , 2022, Nature Communications.

[10]  Dejun Yang,et al.  MAPK Activated Protein Kinase 3 Is a Prognostic-Related Biomarker and Associated With Immune Infiltrates in Glioma , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[11]  A. Fiorentino,et al.  Poor-Prognosis Patients Affected by Glioblastoma: Retrospective Study of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost and Concurrent/Adjuvant Temozolomide , 2021, Journal of personalized medicine.

[12]  K. Camphausen,et al.  Translation Initiation Machinery as a Tumor Selective Target for Radiosensitization , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[13]  Ki-Chun Yoo,et al.  K-RAS Acts as a Critical Regulator of CD44 to Promote the Invasiveness and Stemness of GBM in Response to Ionizing Radiation , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[14]  I. Fournier,et al.  Surfaceome Proteomic of Glioblastoma Revealed Potential Targets for Immunotherapy , 2021, Frontiers in Immunology.

[15]  M. McConnell,et al.  The Big Picture of Glioblastoma Malignancy: A Meta-Analysis of Glioblastoma Proteomics to Identify Altered Biological Pathways , 2021, ACS omega.

[16]  P. Brennan,et al.  Analytic approaches to clinical validation of results from preclinical models of glioblastoma: A systematic review , 2021, medRxiv.

[17]  J. Quackenbush,et al.  Regulatory Network of PD1 Signaling Is Associated with Prognosis in Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2021, Cancer Research.

[18]  A. Rotter,et al.  Cystatin F acts as a mediator of immune suppression in glioblastoma , 2021, Cellular Oncology.

[19]  B. Mroczko,et al.  Molecular and Circulating Biomarkers of Brain Tumors , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[20]  Yi Zhao,et al.  KOBAS-i: intelligent prioritization and exploratory visualization of biological functions for gene enrichment analysis , 2021, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  Lei Guo,et al.  An Improvement of Survival Stratification in Glioblastoma Patients via Combining Subregional Radiomics Signatures , 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[22]  Kathleen M. Jagodnik,et al.  Gene Set Knowledge Discovery with Enrichr , 2021, Current protocols.

[23]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  Proteogenomic and metabolomic characterization of human glioblastoma. , 2021, Cancer cell.

[24]  A. Klekner,et al.  Novel Molecular Markers in Glioblastoma—Benefits of Liquid Biopsy , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[25]  Wan Mohamad Nazarie,et al.  Integration of RNA-Seq and proteomics data identifies glioblastoma multiforme surfaceome signature , 2020, BMC Cancer.

[26]  Jung-Ae Kim Peroxisome Metabolism in Cancer , 2020, Cells.

[27]  N. Shomron,et al.  Proteogenomics of glioblastoma associates molecular patterns with survival , 2020, medRxiv.

[28]  E. Arbustini,et al.  A New Pathway Promotes Adaptation of Human Glioblastoma Cells to Glucose Starvation , 2020, Cells.

[29]  K. Camphausen,et al.  A Serum Proteomic Signature Predicting Survival in Patients with Glioblastoma. , 2020, Journal of biochemistry and analytical studies.

[30]  Jianan Zhang,et al.  A predictive analysis approach for paediatric and adult high-grade glioma: miRNAs and network insight , 2020, Annals of translational medicine.

[31]  E. Hau,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms of Radiation-Induced Cancer Cell Death: A Primer , 2020, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[32]  A. Krauze,et al.  INNV-34. PATTERNS OF FAILURE AND DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL PROGNOSTIC SCORING SYSTEM IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA – FOLLOW UP ON 10 YEAR ANALYSIS OF THE BC CANCER AGENCY POPULATION , 2019, Neuro-Oncology.

[33]  Patrick C. Staples,et al.  An Online Calculator for the Prediction of Survival in Glioblastoma Patients Using Classical Statistics and Machine Learning , 2019, Neurosurgery.

[34]  Xiaohua Douglas Zhang,et al.  Multicellular gene network analysis identifies a macrophage-related gene signature predictive of therapeutic response and prognosis of gliomas , 2019, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[35]  Martin Glas,et al.  Lomustine-temozolomide combination therapy versus standard temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CeTeG/NOA–09): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[36]  Jill P. Mesirov,et al.  A Curated Resource for Phosphosite-specific Signature Analysis* , 2018, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[37]  Erich Schubert,et al.  Faster k-Medoids Clustering: Improving the PAM, CLARA, and CLARANS Algorithms , 2018, SISAP.

[38]  K. Aldape,et al.  MGMT promoter methylation status testing to guide therapy for glioblastoma: refining the approach based on emerging evidence and current challenges. , 2018, Neuro-oncology.

[39]  S. Stylli,et al.  The role of interleukin-6-STAT3 signalling in glioblastoma , 2018, Oncology letters.

[40]  Steven R. Abram,et al.  First results on survival from a large Phase 3 clinical trial of an autologous dendritic cell vaccine in newly diagnosed glioblastoma , 2018, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[41]  F. Lieberman,et al.  Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA.

[42]  Edward F. Chang,et al.  Tumor Evolution of Glioma-Intrinsic Gene Expression Subtypes Associates with Immunological Changes in the Microenvironment. , 2017, Cancer cell.

[43]  S. Stifani,et al.  NF-κB Signalling in Glioblastoma , 2017, Biomedicines.

[44]  J. Flickinger,et al.  Molecular-Based Recursive Partitioning Analysis Model for Glioblastoma in the Temozolomide Era: A Correlative Analysis Based on NRG Oncology RTOG 0525 , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[45]  G. Fimia,et al.  Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress, Unfolded Protein Response, and Cancer Cell Fate , 2017, Front. Oncol..

[46]  J. Theys,et al.  Targeting Notch to overcome radiation resistance , 2015, Oncotarget.

[47]  J. Muller,et al.  Neuropeptides of the VIP family inhibit glioblastoma cell invasion , 2015, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[48]  C. Tanase,et al.  Potential serum biomarkers for glioblastoma diagnostic assessed by proteomic approaches , 2014, Proteome Science.

[49]  Jianbo Wang,et al.  HDGF: a novel jack-of-all-trades in cancer. , 2014, Future oncology.

[50]  K. Aldape,et al.  Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CENTRIC EORTC 26071-22072 study): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[51]  H. Malkki Neuro-oncology: Proteomic profiling could facilitate glioblastoma diagnosis , 2014, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[52]  P. Lichter,et al.  LGR5 is a Marker of Poor Prognosis in Glioblastoma and is Required for Survival of Brain Cancer Stem‐Like Cells , 2013, Brain pathology.

[53]  Larry Gold,et al.  Advances in human proteomics at high scale with the SOMAscan proteomics platform. , 2012, New biotechnology.

[54]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[55]  Y. Wu,et al.  TNF-α/NF-κB/Snail pathway in cancer cell migration and invasion , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[56]  S. Horvath,et al.  WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[57]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis of the EORTC 26981/22981-NCIC CE3 phase III randomized trial. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[58]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[60]  M. Daly,et al.  PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[61]  L. Gold,et al.  Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. , 1990, Science.

[62]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2022, Neuro-Oncology.

[63]  L. Recht,et al.  Rindopepimut with temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed, EGFRvIII-expressing glioblastoma (ACT IV): a randomised, double-blind, international phase 3 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[64]  N. Hodapp Der ICRU-Report 83: Verordnung, Dokumentation und Kommunikation der fluenzmodulierten Photonenstrahlentherapie (IMRT) , 2011, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.