Improving design management techniques in construction

Recent years has seen a significant drive away from traditional procurement routes with contractors finding themselves with an increasing responsibility for control of design - a process they have had little experience in managing. They now have to adapt accordingly. The learning curve is steep, not least because many projects must now be delivered fast track while co-ordinating increasingly complex fabric and content of buildings without a platform of accepted good practice to manage the design process. This is a major factor preventing the UK construction industry from delivering projects on time, to budget and to the specified quality. There is a need to educate an increasing number of people in design management techniques to equip them to manage today’s fast moving and demanding projects. However, many current design management tools are insufficiently developed for industry application. Therefore, to improve design management in the industry, current techniques must be modified to align them with the needs of the modern design manager. This research has developed and tested a training initiative aimed at improving design management practice within a major UK Design and Construct Contractor. It comprises a Design Management Handbook, Design Management Training, Team Support and Project Monitoring. The Design Management Handbook is the core of the training initiative. It addresses critical aspects of design management practice and provides design management tools. Training provides guidance to project teams on the tools and practices. In Team Support project teams are supported in the implementation of the new practices and tools to help embed new ways of working in company practice. Project Monitoring establishes the impact of the new practices on project performance to demonstrate that they are working and thus reinforce change. To establish the training initiative’s effectiveness and key findings, the impact of the initiative on design management performance has been explored. The research has established which practices and tools were used, which were not, as well as an understanding the applicability and performance of each Handbook practice and tool. From this, barriers to implementing new design management tools in industry were identified and strategies developed in order to overcome such barriers.

[1]  Wendi J. Everton A Bias for Action , 2004 .

[2]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Achieving a Lean Design Process , 2000 .

[3]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Total Quality Management: Text with Cases , 1995 .

[4]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  The propagation of rework benchmark metrics for construction , 1999 .

[5]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Management of production in construction: A theoretical view , 1999 .

[6]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  Design management in practice: testing a training initiative to deliver tools and learning , 2003 .

[7]  J. K. White,et al.  The Scanlon Plan: Causes and Correlates of Success , 1979 .

[8]  Khalid Siddiqi,et al.  Using benchmarks and metrics to evaluate project delivery of Environmental restoration programs , 2003 .

[9]  Andy Neely,et al.  Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems , 2000 .

[10]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Design Performance Measurement in the Construction Sector: A Pilot Study , 2001 .

[11]  Faizul Huq,et al.  Benchmarking – best practices: an integrated approach , 1999 .

[12]  Paul Walsh,et al.  Targets and how to assess performance against them , 2000 .

[13]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[14]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Benchmarking and improving construction productivity , 1996 .

[15]  Matthew Hinton,et al.  Best practice benchmarking in the UK , 2000 .

[16]  Carlos T. Formoso,et al.  Improving Performance Through Measurement: The Application of Lean Production and Organisational Learning Principles , 2000 .

[17]  John A. Kuprenas Project Management Actions to Improve Design Phase Cost Performance , 2003 .

[18]  Anthony D. Songer,et al.  Situational Reengineering: Case Study Analysis , 2000 .

[19]  D. Canter,et al.  The Research interview, uses and approaches , 1986 .

[20]  Anna Kochan BOOTHROYD/DEWHURST — QUANTIFY YOUR DESIGNS , 1991 .

[21]  Simon A. Austin,et al.  Construction value management revisited: the designer's role , 2001 .

[22]  Andy Neely,et al.  Designing performance measures: a structured approach , 1997 .

[23]  A. J. Taylor,et al.  The Parallel Nature of Design , 1993 .

[24]  D. Scott Sink,et al.  Productivity management : planning, measurement and evaluation, control, and improvement , 1985 .

[25]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  APPLICATION OF THE ANALYTICAL DESIGN PLANNING TECHNIQUE IN THE PROJECT PROCESS , 1999 .

[26]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  A Data Flow Model to Plan and Manage the Building Design Process , 1996 .

[27]  Mike Kagioglou Generic Design and Construction Process Protocol: Final Report , 1998 .

[28]  Will Hughes,et al.  Building Design Management , 2001 .

[29]  J. Hauser Metrics Thermostat , 2000 .

[30]  Leonard L Fortuin,et al.  Performance Indicators — Why, Where and How? , 1988 .

[31]  Adam Baldwin,et al.  Modelling information flow during the conceptual and schematic stages of building design , 1999 .

[32]  R. Camp Business process benchmarking : finding and implementing best practices , 1995 .

[33]  Luiz Cesar Ribeiro Carpinetti,et al.  What to benchmark , 2002 .

[34]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Integrating design planning, schedule and control with Deplan , 2000 .

[35]  J. H. Rogerson,et al.  A quantitative study of post contract award design changes in construction , 1999 .

[36]  Tom Heath,et al.  A prototype computer-based design management tool , 1994 .

[37]  A. Hopwood,et al.  Accounting and human behaviour , 1976 .

[38]  J. Kent Crawford Project Management Maturity Model: Providing a Proven Path to Project Management Excellence , 2001 .

[39]  James F. Cox,et al.  Designing performance measurement systems for just-in-time operations , 1990 .

[40]  S D Eppinger,et al.  Innovation at the speed of information. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[41]  Neil N. Eldin Management of Engineering/Design Phase , 1991 .

[42]  R. B. Frost Why Does Industry Ignore Design Science , 1999 .

[43]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Towards Lean Design Management , 1997 .

[44]  John Steele,et al.  The interdisciplinary conceptual design of buildings , 2000 .

[45]  Gregory J. Skulmoski Project maturity and competence interface , 2001 .

[46]  Alfredo Serpell,et al.  Performance Measuring Benchmarking, and Modelling of Construction Projects , 1996 .

[47]  M. Zairi Benchmarking for Best Practice: Continuous Learning Through Sustainable Innovation , 1996 .

[48]  Alan Lewis,et al.  Cultural issues in implementing changes to new product development process in a small to medium sized enterprise (SME) , 2000 .

[49]  A. Neely Three modes of measurement: theory and practice , 1998 .

[50]  Shlomo Globerson,et al.  Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organization , 1985 .

[51]  M. Beer,et al.  Why change programs don't produce change. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[52]  Philip Race 2000 Tips for Lecturers , 1999 .

[53]  Robert S Miles,et al.  Alliance Lean Design/Construct on a Small High Tech Project , 1998 .

[54]  Jerry Kanter Have we Forgotten the Fundamental it Enabler: Ease of Use , 2000, Inf. Syst. Manag..