Development and Implementation of a Platform for Public Information on Air Quality, Sensor Measurements, and Citizen Science

The use of low-cost sensors for air quality measurements is expanding rapidly, with an associated rise in the number of citizens measuring air quality themselves. This has major implications for traditional air quality monitoring as performed by Environmental Protection Agencies. Here we reflect on the experiences of the Dutch Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) with the use of low-cost sensors, particularly NO2 and PM10/PM2.5-sensors, and related citizen science, over the last few years. Specifically, we discuss the Dutch Innovation Program for Environmental Monitoring, which comprises the development of a knowledge portal and sensor data portal, new calibration approaches for sensors, and modelling and assimilation techniques for incorporating these uncertain sensor data into air pollution models. Finally, we highlight some of the challenges that come with the use of low-cost sensors for air quality monitoring, and give some specific use-case examples. Our results show that low-cost sensors can be a valuable addition to traditional air quality monitoring, but so far, their use in official monitoring has been limited. More research is needed to establish robust calibration methods while ongoing work is also aimed at a better understanding of the public’s needs for air quality information to optimize the use of low-cost sensors.

[1]  M. Brauer,et al.  High-Resolution Air Pollution Mapping with Google Street View Cars: Exploiting Big Data. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Gb Stewart,et al.  The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, high-density networks , 2013 .

[3]  Sven Schade,et al.  Next Generation Air Quality Platform: Openness and Interoperability for the Internet of Things , 2016, Sensors.

[4]  Jian Gao,et al.  Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone? , 2018, Environment international.

[5]  P. Schneider,et al.  Performance Assessment of a Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor for a near Four-Month Period in Oslo, Norway , 2019, Atmosphere.

[6]  U. Lerner,et al.  On the feasibility of measuring urban air pollution by wireless distributed sensor networks. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  William G. Griswold,et al.  Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Tools: From Research to Practice (A Workshop Summary) , 2017, Sensors.

[8]  A. Lewis,et al.  Validate personal air-pollution sensors , 2016, Nature.

[9]  Allen L. Robinson,et al.  A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring , 2018 .

[10]  E. Snyder,et al.  The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  W. Lahoz,et al.  Mapping urban air quality in near real-time using observations from low-cost sensors and model information. , 2017, Environment international.

[12]  H. Ishida,et al.  Gas sensor network for air-pollution monitoring , 2005 .

[13]  Xiaoting Liu,et al.  The influence of humidity on the performance of a low-cost air particle mass sensor and the effect of atmospheric fog , 2018 .

[14]  Qijun Jiang,et al.  Citizen Sensing for Improved Urban Environmental Monitoring , 2016, J. Sensors.

[15]  Roderic L. Jones,et al.  Validating novel air pollution sensors to improve exposure estimates for epidemiological analyses and citizen science , 2017, Environmental research.

[16]  Sha Lu,et al.  Curriculum vitae of the LOTOS–EUROS (v2.0) chemistry transport model , 2017 .

[17]  Alena Bartonova,et al.  Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? , 2017, Environment international.