Ability Grouping and Teacher-Students Interaction among High and Low Achieving Students in Middle Primary Schools in the United Arab Emirates

This research investigated teacher-students interaction in various learning settings in middle primary schools in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). These settings include mixed- and same-ability classrooms as well as mixed- and same-ability learning groups within the same classroom. The sample consisted of 16 low-and high-achieving male and female students selected from two middle primary schools from Al-Ain City, Abu Dhabi. The results indicate that high-achieving students in all groups interacted more than low-achieving ones and high-achieving girls interacted more than high-achieving boys. Boys interacted in the same-ability classrooms more than they did in mixed-ability classrooms but girls showed opposite results. Students in the same-ability groups interacted more than those in the mixed-ability groups. The results also reveal that teachers interacted with boys in all groups more than they did with girls and with high-achieving students more than they did with low-achieving ones. They also interacted with low-achieving boys more than they did with low-achieving girls. Teachers interacted with highachieving boys in the same-ability classrooms more than they did with the boys in mixed-ability classroom. They interacted with low- achieving boys and girls in the mixed-ability classrooms more than they did with these boy and girls in the sameability classrooms. The patterns of interaction that were used by teachers and all students in all settings were also identified in the study.

[1]  J. Kesner,et al.  Teacher-child relationships in Turkish and United States schools: A cross-cultural study , 2005 .

[2]  G. Ansalone,et al.  Poverty, tracking, and the social construction of failure: International perspectives on tracking , 2003 .

[3]  Mike Younger,et al.  The Gender Gap and Classroom Interactions: Reality and rhetoric? , 1999 .

[4]  L. Kramer Perceptions of Ability in One Middle School: A Study of Gifted Adolescent Females , 1985 .

[5]  Bonnie Grossen,et al.  How Should We Group To Achieve Excellence with Equity , 1996 .

[6]  B. Egeland,et al.  The long-term consequences of infant day-care and mother-infant attachment. , 1995, Child development.

[7]  Brian Cambourne,et al.  The coding of naturalistic data , 1989 .

[8]  theodossia-soula Pavlidou Patterns of Participation in Classroom Interaction: Girls’ and Boys’ Non-compliance in a Greek High School , 2003 .

[9]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[10]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Elementary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 1986 .

[11]  R. Slavin Grouping for Instruction in the elementary School , 1987 .

[12]  B. Hamre,et al.  How schools can do better: fostering stronger connections between teachers and students. , 2002, New directions for youth development.

[13]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning , 1992 .

[14]  T. Gerig,et al.  Silent Sixth-Grade Students: Characteristics, Achievement, and Teacher Expectations , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[15]  James A. Kulik,et al.  Meta-analytic Findings on Grouping Programs , 1992 .

[16]  R. Felder,et al.  Effective Strategies for Cooperative Learning. , 2001 .

[17]  M. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[18]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Effects of within-class ability grouping on social interaction, achievement, and motivation , 2005 .

[19]  Paul D. Eggen,et al.  Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms , 1998 .

[20]  R. Gillies,et al.  Teachers' and students' verbal behaviours during cooperative and small-group learning. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[21]  Jody Berland The elephant in the classroom , 2009 .

[22]  L. Resnick,et al.  Assessment as the Catalyst of School Reform. , 1993 .

[23]  Rebecca D. Freeman The Importance of Participant Role in Cooperative Learning , 1993 .

[24]  John Hollifield Ability Grouping in Elementary Schools. , 1987 .

[25]  Myra Sadker,et al.  Is the O.K. Classroom O.K. , 1985 .

[26]  C. Callahan The gifted girl: An anomaly? , 1979 .

[27]  Mary G. Rizza,et al.  Examining Perceptions of Challenge and Choice in Classrooms: The Relationship Between Teachers and Their Students and Comparisons Between Gifted Students and Other Students , 2002 .

[28]  Walter G. Secada Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. , 1992 .

[29]  T. Good,et al.  Student Passivity: A Study of Question Asking in K-12 Classrooms. , 1987 .

[30]  E. Peisner-Feinberg,et al.  The Consistency of Perceived Teacher–Child Relationships Between Preschool and Kindergarten , 2000 .

[31]  Susan Winebrenner,et al.  In search of reality: Unraveling the myths about tracking, ability grouping, and the gifted , 1993 .

[32]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 1990 .