193-nm immersion photomask image placement in exposure tools

In case drastic changes need to be made to tool configurations or blank specifications, it is important to know as early as possible under which conditions the tight image placement requirements of future lithography nodes can be achieved. Modeling, such as finite element simulations, can help predict the magnitude of structural and thermal effects before actual manufacturing issues occur, and basic experiments using current tools can readily be conducted to verify the predicted results or perform feasibility tests for future nodes. Using numerical simulations, experimental mask registration, and printing data, the effects on image placement of stressed layer patterning, pellicle attachment, blank dimensional and material tolerances, as well as charging during e-beam writing were investigated for current mask blank specifications. This provides an understanding of the areas that require more work for image placement error budgets to be met and to insure the viability of optical lithography for future nodes.

[1]  Dirk Beyer,et al.  Alternating aperture phase shift mask process using e-beam lithography for the second level , 2004, Photomask Japan.

[2]  Roxann L. Engelstad,et al.  Strategies for predictive control of chrome stress-induced registration errors , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Junji Hirumi,et al.  Deflection error due to charge-up effect of reticle substrate , 1998, Photomask and Next Generation Lithography Mask Technology.

[4]  S. Radelaar,et al.  Thermal effects in high voltage e‐beam lithography , 1991 .

[5]  K. D. Cummings,et al.  Charging effects from electron beam lithography , 1989 .

[6]  Harold G. Craighead,et al.  Charge induced pattern distortion in low energy electron beam lithography , 2000 .

[7]  Christian Holfeld,et al.  EUV mask image placement management in writing, registration, and exposure tools , 2005, Photomask Japan.

[8]  Roxann L. Engelstad,et al.  Assessment of thermal loading-induced distortions in optical photomasks due to e-beam multipass patterning , 1998 .

[9]  Nicholas K. Eib,et al.  Thermal distribution and the effect on resist sensitivity in electron‐beam direct write , 1989 .

[10]  Ute Buttgereit,et al.  Determination of mask layer stress by placement metrology , 2005, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[11]  T. R. Groves,et al.  Resist heating effects in 25 and 50 kV e‐beam lithography on glass masks , 1990 .

[12]  Roxann L. Engelstad,et al.  Mask-related distortions of modified fused silica reticles for 157-nm lithography , 2002, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[13]  Yoshio Gomei,et al.  Analysis of mask distortion induced by heating during e-beam writing , 1994, Photomask and Next Generation Lithography Mask Technology.

[14]  Roxann L. Engelstad,et al.  Pattern transfer distortions in optical photomasks , 2001 .

[15]  R. Engelstad,et al.  Effects of chrome pattern characteristics on image placement due to thermomechanical distortion of optical reticles during exposure , 2003 .

[16]  Minoru Sakamoto,et al.  Development of new chrome blanks for 65-nm node and beyond , 2004, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[17]  Keiji Watanabe,et al.  Application of charge-dispersing layer to reticle fabrication , 1997, Photomask and Next Generation Lithography Mask Technology.

[18]  Roxann L. Engelstad,et al.  Determination of image placement accuracy due to EUV mask fabrication procedures , 2002 .

[19]  Costas J. Spanos,et al.  Modeling of mask thermal distortion and its dependency on pattern density , 2005, Photomask Japan.

[20]  Roxann L. Engelstad,et al.  Effects of material properties on patterning distortions of optical reticles , 1998, Photomask Technology.

[21]  Gerd Scheuring,et al.  Actual measurement data obtained on new 65nm generation mask metrology tool set , 2005, Other Conferences.

[22]  Yulia O. Korobko,et al.  Calibration of the registration metrology systems , 2004, SPIE Photomask Technology.