Perspectives on Basis Sets Beautiful: Seasonal Plantings of Diffuse Basis Functions.

We present a perspective on the use of diffuse basis functions for electronic structure calculations by density functional theory and wave function theory. We especially emphasize minimally augmented basis sets and calendar basis sets. We base our conclusions on our previous experience with commonly computed quantities, such as bond energies, barrier heights, electron affinities, noncovalent (van der Waals and hydrogen bond) interaction energies, and ionization potentials, on Stephens et al.'s results for optical rotation and on our own new calculations (presented here) of polarizabilities and of potential energy curves of van der Waals complexes. We emphasize the benefits of partial augmentation of the higher-zeta basis sets in preference to full augmentation at a lower ζ level. Benefits and limitations of the use of fully, partially, and minimally augmented basis sets are reviewed for different electronic structure methods and molecular properties. We have found that minimal augmentation is almost always enough for density functional theory (DFT) when applied to ionization potentials, electron affinities, atomization energies, barrier heights, and hydrogen-bond energies. For electric dipole polarizabilities, we find that augmentation beyond minimal has an average effect of 8% at the polarized triple-ζ level and 5% at the polarized quadruple-ζ level. The effects are larger for potential energy curves of van der Waals complexes. The effects are also larger for wave function theory (WFT). Even for WFT though, full augmentation is not needed for most purposes, and a level of augmentation between minimal and full is optimal for most problems. The calendar basis sets named after the months provide a convergent sequence of partially augmented basis sets that can be used for such calculations. The jun-cc-pV(T+d)Z basis set is very useful for MP2-F12 calculations of barrier heights and hydrogen bond strengths.

[1]  L. Curtiss,et al.  Heats of formation of alkali metal and alkaline earth metal oxides and hydroxides: Surprisingly demanding targets for high-level ab initio procedures , 2003 .

[2]  D. Truhlar,et al.  Efficient Diffuse Basis Sets for Density Functional Theory. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[3]  Steven E. J. Bell,et al.  Reduced‐size polarized basis sets for calculations of molecular electric properties. I. The basis set generation , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  Angelika Baranowska-Laczkowska,et al.  Model studies of the optical rotation, and theoretical determination of its sign for β‐pinene and trans‐pinane , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..

[5]  Donald G Truhlar,et al.  Tests of the RPBE, revPBE, tau-HCTHhyb, omegaB97X-D, and MOHLYP density functional approximations and 29 others against representative databases for diverse bond energies and barrier heights in catalysis. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  M. Halls,et al.  COMPARISON STUDY OF THE PREDICTION OF RAMAN INTENSITIES USING ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE METHODS , 1999 .

[7]  P. Hay,et al.  Ab initio static polarisabilities of N2 and linear symmetric CO2 in the Hartree-Fock approximation: variation with internuclear separation , 1977 .

[8]  Hannah R. Leverentz,et al.  Efficient Diffuse Basis Sets: cc-pVxZ+ and maug-cc-pVxZ. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[9]  F. Weigend,et al.  Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. , 2005, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[10]  F. E. Jorge,et al.  Some considerations about Gaussian basis sets for electric property calculations , 2009 .

[11]  H. Werner,et al.  Finite perturbation calculations for the static dipole polarizabilities of the first-row atoms , 1976 .

[12]  M. Frisch,et al.  Hartree−Fock and Density Functional Theory ab Initio Calculation of Optical Rotation Using GIAOs: Basis Set Dependence , 2000 .

[13]  Seiichiro Ten-no,et al.  Initiation of explicitly correlated Slater-type geminal theory , 2004 .

[14]  T. L. Fonseca,et al.  Static polarizabilities of doubly charged polyacetylene oligomers: basis set and electron correlation effects , 2003 .

[15]  M. Head‐Gordon,et al.  A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories , 1989 .

[16]  D. Truhlar,et al.  Adiabatic Polarization Potentials for the Water and Nitrogen Molecules. A Comparison of Large and Small Basis Sets , 1981 .

[17]  L. Curtiss,et al.  Gaussian-3 (G3) theory for molecules containing first and second-row atoms , 1998 .

[18]  R. R. Toczyłowski,et al.  Ground state potential energy curves for He2, Ne2, Ar2, He–Ne, He–Ar, and Ne–Ar: A coupled-cluster study , 1999 .

[19]  Michael J. Frisch,et al.  Self‐consistent molecular orbital methods 25. Supplementary functions for Gaussian basis sets , 1984 .

[20]  D. Truhlar,et al.  Minimally augmented Karlsruhe basis sets , 2011 .

[21]  Donald G. Truhlar,et al.  Effectiveness of Diffuse Basis Functions for Calculating Relative Energies by Density Functional Theory , 2003 .

[22]  T. Dunning,et al.  Electron affinities of the first‐row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions , 1992 .

[23]  Hans-Joachim Werner,et al.  PNO-CI and PNO-CEPA studies of electron correlation effects , 1976 .

[24]  H. Schlegel,et al.  Dipole Moments, Polarizabilities, and Infrared Intensities Calculated with Electric Field Dependent Functions , 1994 .

[25]  Peter Politzer,et al.  Chemical Applications of Atomic and Molecular Electrostatic Potentials: "Reactivity, Structure, Scattering, And Energetics Of Organic, Inorganic, And Biological Systems" , 2013 .

[26]  Frederick R Manby,et al.  General orbital invariant MP2-F12 theory. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[27]  D. Truhlar,et al.  Convergent Partially Augmented Basis Sets for Post-Hartree-Fock Calculations of Molecular Properties and Reaction Barrier Heights. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[28]  G. A. Petersson,et al.  Complete basis set correlation energies. IV. The total correlation energy of the water molecule , 1985 .

[29]  D. Truhlar,et al.  Kinetics of hydrogen-transfer isomerizations of butoxyl radicals. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[30]  W. Hug,et al.  Rarefied Basis Sets for the Calculation of Optical Tensors. 1. The Importance of Gradients on Hydrogen Atoms for the Raman Scattering Tensor , 2004 .

[31]  Angelika Baranowska-Laczkowska,et al.  Polarized basis sets for accurate calculations of static and dynamic electric properties of molecules , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  D. Truhlar,et al.  Direct dynamics study of hydrogen-transfer isomerization of 1-pentyl and 1-hexyl radicals. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[33]  L. Hermosilla,et al.  Kinetic and Mechanistic Study on p-Quinodimethane Formation in the Sulfinyl Precursor Route for the Polymerization of Poly(p-phenylenevinylene) (PPV) , 2010 .

[34]  D. Truhlar,et al.  Ab initio self-consistent-field polarizabilities and electron-molecule adiabatic polarization potentials. III. N 2 , 1979 .

[35]  Wesley D. Allen,et al.  The heat of formation of NCO , 1993 .

[36]  F. E. Jorge,et al.  Augmented Gaussian basis sets of double and triple zeta valence qualities for the atoms K and Sc–Kr: Applications in HF, MP2, and DFT calculations of molecular electric properties , 2009 .

[37]  D. Truhlar,et al.  Multi-coefficient Gaussian-3 method for calculating potential energy surfaces , 1999 .

[38]  David Feller,et al.  Basis Set Selection for Molecular Calculations , 1986 .

[39]  M. Frisch,et al.  Calculation of Optical Rotation Using Density Functional Theory , 2001 .

[40]  Kirk A. Peterson,et al.  The CO molecule: the role of basis set and correlation treatment in the calculation of molecular properties , 1997 .