Walk this way: Approaching bodies can influence the processing of faces

A highly familiar type of movement occurs whenever a person walks towards you. In the present study, we investigated whether this type of motion has an effect on face processing. We took a range of different 3D head models and placed them on a single, identical 3D body model. The resulting figures were animated to approach the observer. In a first series of experiments, we used a sequential matching task to investigate how the motion of an approaching person affects immediate responses to faces. We compared observers' responses following approach sequences to their performance with figures walking backwards (receding motion) or remaining still. Observers were significantly faster in responding to a target face that followed an approach sequence, compared to both receding and static primes. In a second series of experiments, we investigated long-term effects of motion using a delayed visual search paradigm. After studying moving or static avatars, observers searched for target faces in static arrays of varying set sizes. Again, observers were faster at responding to faces that had been learned in the context of an approach sequence. Together these results suggest that the context of a moving body influences face processing, and support the hypothesis that our visual system has mechanisms that aid the encoding of behaviourally-relevant and familiar dynamic events.

[1]  B. Gelder Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  D. Simons,et al.  Moving and looming stimuli capture attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  A. Clark Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[5]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[7]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Active versus passive processing of biological motion , 2002, Perception.

[8]  Aina Puce,et al.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  W. Prinz,et al.  Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  J. Tanji,et al.  Premotor cortex neurons in macaques: activity before distal and proximal forelimb movements , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  Q. Vuong,et al.  Incidental Processing of Biological Motion , 2004, Current Biology.

[12]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Recognizing moving faces: a psychological and neural synthesis , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 2002, Neuron.

[14]  P. A. Kolers,et al.  Size in the visual processing of faces and words. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Schultz,et al.  Natural facial motion enhances cortical responses to faces , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[17]  James V. Stone Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures , 1998, Vision Research.

[18]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Recognising novel deforming objects , 2005 .

[19]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  V. Bruce,et al.  The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[21]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Harriet A Allen,et al.  Visual mechanisms of motion analysis and motion perception. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  J. Freyd,et al.  Probing the time course of representational momentum. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Human recognition of familiar and unfamiliar people in naturalistic video , 2003, 2003 IEEE International SOI Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.03CH37443).

[25]  B. de Gelder Why bodies? Twelve reasons for including bodily expressions in affective neuroscience. , 2009, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  Asif A Ghazanfar,et al.  Looming Biases in Monkey Auditory Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  E. Procyk,et al.  Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face Recognition in Poor-Quality Video: Evidence From Security Surveillance , 1999 .

[29]  Mary-Ellen Large,et al.  The role of axes of elongation and symmetry in rotated object naming , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  James A. Caviness,et al.  Persistent Fear Responses in Rhesus Monkeys to the Optical Stimulus of "Looming" , 1962, Science.

[31]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  A Simon effect with stationary moving stimuli. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  V. Bruce,et al.  Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[33]  E. Tronick,et al.  Approach response of domestic chicks to an optical display. , 1967, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[34]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain Activity Evoked by the Perception of Human Walking: Controlling for Meaningful Coherent Motion , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  D. Perrett,et al.  Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations , 1998, Cognition.

[36]  tephen E. Palmer The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Asif A Ghazanfar,et al.  Multisensory Integration of Looming Signals by Rhesus Monkeys , 2004, Neuron.

[38]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  Recognizing Famous Faces: Exploring the Benefits of Facial Motion , 2000 .

[39]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Learning influences the encoding of static and dynamic faces and their recognition across different spatial frequencies , 2009 .

[40]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Human Body Perception From The Inside Out , 2005 .

[41]  C. Keysers,et al.  The Observation and Execution of Actions Share Motor and Somatosensory Voxels in all Tested Subjects: Single-Subject Analyses of Unsmoothed fMRI Data , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[43]  Hidemi Shimizu,et al.  Measuring keyboard response delays by comparing keyboard and joystick inputs , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[44]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  T. Bower,et al.  Infant responses to approaching objects: An indicator of response to distal variables , 1971 .

[46]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[48]  T. Albright,et al.  Motion mechanisms in macaque MT. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  T. Hubbard Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  A. Johnston,et al.  The Role of Movement in Face Recognition , 1997 .

[51]  J. Henderson,et al.  Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes , 2002 .

[52]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  An advantage for detecting dynamic targets in natural scenes. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[54]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[55]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Attentional Networks and Biological Motion , 2010 .

[56]  Michael J Tarr,et al.  Structural Similarity and Spatiotemporal Noise Effects on Learning Dynamic Novel Objects , 2006, Perception.

[57]  D. Perrett,et al.  EPS Mid-Career Award 2008 Seeing the future : Natural image sequences produce “ anticipatory ” neuronal activity and bias perceptual report , 2009 .

[58]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  Functional organization of inferior area 6. , 1987, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[59]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[60]  Michael Schünke,et al.  The Human Body , 2004 .

[61]  W. Schiff PERCEPTION OF IMPENDING COLLISION: A STUDY OF VISUALLY DIRECTED AVOIDANT BEHAVIOR. , 1965, Psychological monographs.

[62]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Effects of temporal association on recognition memory , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  A search advantage for faces learned in motion , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[64]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Recognizing people from dynamic and static faces and bodies: Dissecting identity with a fusion approach , 2010 .

[66]  John E Hummel,et al.  Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  A. Calder,et al.  Neural mechanisms of social attention , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  T. Poggio,et al.  Considerations on models of movement detection , 1973, Kybernetik.

[69]  D. Perrett,et al.  Recognition of objects and their component parts: responses of single units in the temporal cortex of the macaque. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[70]  G. Johansson Visual motion perception. , 1975, Scientific American.

[71]  W. Schiff,et al.  Recognizing people seen in events via dynamic "mug shots". , 1986, The American journal of psychology.

[72]  Paul Miller,et al.  Verification of face identities from images captured on video. , 1999 .

[73]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  The role of motion in learning new faces , 2003 .

[74]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[75]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity , 2003, Vision Research.

[76]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[77]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[78]  M. Tarr,et al.  Rotation direction affects object recognition , 2004, Vision Research.

[79]  W. Matthews,et al.  Memory for moving and static images , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[80]  M. Sereno,et al.  Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[81]  E. Franz,et al.  Hemispheric Competition in Left-Handers on Bimanual Reaction Time Tasks , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[82]  A. Johnston,et al.  Categorizing sex and identity from the biological motion of faces , 2001, Current Biology.

[83]  B. Hassenstein,et al.  Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeit-, Reihenfolgen- und Vorzeichenauswertung bei der Bewegungsperzeption des Rüsselkäfers Chlorophanus , 1956 .

[84]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Evidence of Mirror Neurons in Human Inferior Frontal Gyrus , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[85]  Colin W G Clifford,et al.  About Turn , 2009, Psychological science.

[86]  Z. Kourtzi,et al.  A Matching Advantage for Dynamic Human Faces , 2002, Perception.

[87]  I. Biederman,et al.  Searching for objects in real-world scences. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[88]  G. Pike,et al.  Recognizing moving faces: The relative contribution of motion and perspective view information. , 1997 .

[89]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape , 1996, Vision Research.

[90]  R. Ratcliff Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[91]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  How many pixels make an image? , 2009, Visual Neuroscience.

[92]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[93]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[94]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[95]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Detection by action: neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[96]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[97]  James V. Stone,et al.  Object recognition: view-specificity and motion-specificity , 1999, Vision Research.

[98]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  Matching the faces of robbers captured on video , 2001 .

[99]  S. Vereza Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 2001 .

[100]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[101]  A. Torralba,et al.  The role of context in object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[102]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[103]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Distinct mechanisms for the representation of moving and static objects , 2002 .

[104]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[105]  J. Haxby,et al.  fMRI Responses to Video and Point-Light Displays of Moving Humans and Manipulable Objects , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[106]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[107]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[108]  W. Ball,et al.  Infant Responses to Impending Collision: Optical and Real , 1971, Science.

[109]  Jodi L. Davenport,et al.  Scene Consistency in Object and Background Perception , 2004, Psychological science.