Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes.

Four studies investigated differences in accessibility of affective and cognitive components of attitudes. Accessibility was measured by response times on bipolar semantic differential evaluative adjectives (e.g. ‘positive–negative’) in response to how one felt and thought, respectively, about an attitude object. The evaluative items were accompanied by affective and cognitive context items, which were not analysed, but were meant to promote the retrieval of affective and cognitive evaluations respectively. Responses to affective evaluations were given faster than responses to cognitive evaluations, suggesting that affect-based evaluations are more accessible in memory than cognition-based evaluations. The results were obtained in two attitude domains, i.e. brand names and countries. The results support the validity of a two-component affect–cognition model of attitude. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Ştefan Boncu,et al.  E. Tory Higgins si Arie Kruglanski (coord.), Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles, Guilford, New York, 1997 , 1998 .

[2]  William von Hippel,et al.  Hearts and Minds: The Priority of Affective Versus Cognitive Factors in Person Perception , 1995 .

[3]  A. Manstead,et al.  Evaluating and extending the theory of planned behaviour , 1995 .

[4]  B. Verplanken.  Emotion and Cognition: Attitudes toward Persons Who Are Visually Impaired. , 1994 .

[5]  R. Petty,et al.  Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Properties of Attitudes: Conceptual and Methodological Issues , 1994 .

[6]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies , 1994 .

[7]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. , 1993 .

[8]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? , 1993 .

[9]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[11]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Steven J. Breckler,et al.  Cognitive responses in persuasion: affective and evaluative determinants , 1991 .

[13]  K. Edwards,et al.  The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Attitude Formation and Change , 1990 .

[14]  K. Millar,et al.  Attitude change as a function of attitude type and argument type. , 1990 .

[15]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. , 1990 .

[16]  Steven J. Breckler,et al.  Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes , 1989 .

[17]  A. Tesser,et al.  Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude–behavior relation. , 1986 .

[18]  S. Breckler.  Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Richard S. Lazarus,et al.  On the Primacy of Cognition. , 1984 .

[20]  A. Isen,et al.  Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. , 1984 .

[21]  R. Fazio,et al.  Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association , 1982 .

[22]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[23]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  The Construct Validity Of The Affective, Behavioral, And Cognitive Components Of Attitude By Analysis Of Covariance Structures. , 1978, Multivariate behavioral research.

[24]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[25]  T. Ostrom.  The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. , 1969 .