Fast visual prediction and slow optimization of preferred walking speed.

People prefer walking speeds that minimize energetic cost. This may be accomplished by directly sensing metabolic rate and adapting gait to minimize it, but only slowly due to the compounded effects of sensing delays and iterative convergence. Visual and other sensory information is available more rapidly and could help predict which gait changes reduce energetic cost, but only approximately because it relies on prior experience and an indirect means to achieve economy. We used virtual reality to manipulate visually presented speed while 10 healthy subjects freely walked on a self-paced treadmill to test whether the nervous system beneficially combines these two mechanisms. Rather than manipulating the speed of visual flow directly, we coupled it to the walking speed selected by the subject and then manipulated the ratio between these two speeds. We then quantified the dynamics of walking speed adjustments in response to perturbations of the visual speed. For step changes in visual speed, subjects responded with rapid speed adjustments (lasting <2 s) and in a direction opposite to the perturbation and consistent with returning the visually presented speed toward their preferred walking speed, when visual speed was suddenly twice (one-half) the walking speed, subjects decreased (increased) their speed. Subjects did not maintain the new speed but instead gradually returned toward the speed preferred before the perturbation (lasting >300 s). The timing and direction of these responses strongly indicate that a rapid predictive process informed by visual feedback helps select preferred speed, perhaps to complement a slower optimization process that seeks to minimize energetic cost.

[1]  R. Kram,et al.  Mechanical and metabolic determinants of the preferred step width in human walking , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Laura F. Fox,et al.  Self-motion perception during locomotor recalibration: more than meets the eye. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Manoj Srinivasan,et al.  Optimal speeds for walking and running, and walking on a moving walkway. , 2009, Chaos.

[4]  H. Ralston Energy-speed relation and optimal speed during level walking , 1958, Internationale Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie einschließlich Arbeitsphysiologie.

[5]  Jacques Mercier,et al.  Energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory responses at the transition between walking and running , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[6]  C A Smith,et al.  Response time and sensitivity of the ventilatory response to CO2 in unanesthetized intact dogs: central vs. peripheral chemoreceptors. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  Greta C Bernatz,et al.  How humans walk: bout duration, steps per bout, and rest duration. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[8]  J. Gibson Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. , 1998, British journal of psychology.

[9]  A. Kuo A simple model of bipedal walking predicts the preferred speed-step length relationship. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[11]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  Calibration of locomotion resulting from visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment , 2007, TAP.

[12]  R. Lewin The pace of life , 1976, Nature.

[13]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  R. Kram,et al.  Energy cost and muscular activity required for leg swing during walking. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  Wendy D. Zosh,et al.  Optic Flow Drives Human Visuo-Locomotor Adaptation , 2007, Current Biology.

[16]  Eli Peli,et al.  A feedback-controlled interface for treadmill locomotion in virtual environments , 2007, TAP.

[17]  Hiroyasu Ujike,et al.  Effects of visually simulated roll motion on vection and postural stabilization , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[18]  H. Ralston,et al.  Optimization of energy expenditure during level walking , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[19]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[20]  A. Ruina,et al.  Multiple walking speed-frequency relations are predicted by constrained optimization. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  H. Elftman,et al.  Biomechanics of muscle with particular application to studies of gait. , 1966, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  J. Donelan,et al.  Mechanics and energetics of swinging the human leg , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  S M Hilton,et al.  The reflex nature of the pressor response to muscular exercise , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Anne E. Garing,et al.  Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  A Hreljac,et al.  Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion. , 1993, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[26]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  The vestibular system , 2005, Current Biology.

[27]  A. D. Kuo,et al.  Mechanics and energetics of swinging the human leg , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  W. Berger,et al.  Visual influence on human locomotion , 1997 .

[29]  K. Newell,et al.  Metabolic energy expenditure and the regulation of movement economy , 1998 .

[30]  Kristof De Smet,et al.  Effects of optic flow on spontaneous overground walk-to-run transition , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[32]  Kathleen Cullen,et al.  The Vestibular System , 2003 .

[33]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in virtual reality , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005..

[34]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Measuring vection in a large screen virtual environment , 2005, APGV '05.

[35]  J. Fung,et al.  Modulation of walking speed by changing optic flow in persons with stroke , 2006, 2006 International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation.

[36]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Adaptations to changing speed in human locomotion: speed of transition between walking and running. , 1987, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[37]  R. Kram,et al.  Energetic cost and preferred speed of walking in obese vs. normal weight women. , 2005, Obesity research.

[38]  G D Swanson,et al.  Central and peripheral chemoreflex loop gain in normal and carotid body-resected subjects. , 1979, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[39]  John E A Bertram,et al.  Constrained optimization in human walking: cost minimization and gait plasticity , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[40]  Mark Snaterse,et al.  Distinct fast and slow processes contribute to the selection of preferred step frequency during human walking. , 2011, Journal of applied physiology.

[41]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  Preferred speed and cost of transport: the effect of incline. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[42]  J Maxwell Donelan,et al.  Dynamic Principles of Gait and Their Clinical Implications , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[43]  W. Berger,et al.  Visual influence on human locomotion Modulation to changes in optic flow , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  A. Kuo,et al.  Direction-dependent control of balance during walking and standing. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  M. Kaufman,et al.  The Exercise Pressor Reflex , 2002, Clinical Autonomic Research.

[46]  J. Gibson Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals , 2009 .