Partnering Elements’ Importance for Success in the Norwegian Construction Industry☆

Abstract As construction projects are becoming more complex and uncertain, and there is an increased focus on sustainability and green building, partnering is a way of enabling a non-adversarial environment. This creates a flexible process that helps e.g. retrofit projects achieving their goals. The purpose of this paper is to identify key elements that ensure the success of partnering projects for the different stakeholders. This paper will seek to answer the following questions: What elements are used in partnering projects? Is there a link between the use of the different partnering elements and the project's success seen from the client, contractor and user perspective? The research is carried out as a review of partnering literature, as well as an investigation of 10 partnering projects within the Norwegian context, using a case study approach. The investigated projects were both new buildings and retrofittings. A preliminary survey with additional in-depth, semi-structured interviews of clients and contractors was conducted. A document study was also carried out as a supplement to the survey and interviews. Key partnering elements such as early involvement, value-based procurement and start-up workshop were identified through this study. Further analysis revealed that these partnering elements, in combination with soft elements such as trust, commitment and competence, help facilitate success for stakeholders. The identified key partnering elements gives practitioners an implication of which partnering elements should be implemented to achieve project success and more sustainable buildings.

[1]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Procurement Effects on Coopetition in Client-Contractor Relationships , 2008 .

[2]  Donn E. Hancher,et al.  Partnering: Contracting for the Future , 1990 .

[3]  Akintola Akintoye,et al.  An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction , 2000 .

[4]  J. Barlow,et al.  Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects , 2000 .

[5]  Florence Yean Yng Ling,et al.  Incorporating Contractual Incentives to Facilitate Relational Contracting , 2006 .

[6]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  The definition of alliancing in construction as a Wittgenstein family-resemblance concept , 2007 .

[7]  Shamil Naoum An overview into the concept of partnering , 2003 .

[8]  P. Eriksson Partnering: what is it, when should it be used, and how should it be implemented? , 2010 .

[9]  Keith D. Hampson,et al.  Project alliancing vs project partnering: a case study of the Australian National Museum Project , 2002 .

[10]  Heng Li,et al.  Development of a Practical Model of Partnering for Construction Projects , 2004 .

[11]  Graham Winch,et al.  Institutional reform in British construction: partnering and private finance , 2000 .

[12]  Pertti Lahdenperä,et al.  Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery , 2012 .

[13]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  Starting From Scratch: A New Project Delivery Paradigm , 2014 .

[14]  Wei Tong Chen,et al.  Critical success factors for construction partnering in Taiwan , 2007 .

[15]  Tuomas Ahola,et al.  Practical difficulties encountered in attempting to implement a partnering approach , 2012 .

[16]  Steve R. Sanders,et al.  PEER-REVIEWED PAPER:Partnering Continuum , 1998 .

[17]  Johan Nyström The definition of partnering as a Wittgenstein family‐resemblance concept , 2005 .

[18]  Evangelos Psomas,et al.  The impact of “soft” and “hard” TQM elements on quality management results , 2009 .

[19]  Ola Lædre,et al.  Partnering in Statsbygg , 2014 .

[20]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[21]  Ashok Jashapara,et al.  Towards positive partnering: Revealing the realities in the construction industry , 1997 .

[22]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Procurement strategies : a relationship-based approach , 2003 .

[23]  William Swan,et al.  Mutual objective setting for partnering projects in the public sector , 2007 .